Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bike FI - why did it take so long?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:24 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Bike FI - why did it take so long? Reply with quote

Was pondering this on the way home. Why did it take so long for FI to become pretty much standard on bikes? It was pretty much universal in cars by the early 90's, but it took another 10 to make the same transition to bikes - why?

Now, I don't want the 'because it was easier to get carbs working well across the rev range' answer, because I know that. What I want to know is why that is the case.

What was the technical problems encountered with FI which held it up for so long?

Thanks!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Faldo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:28 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think manufacturer's wanted to use FI, but emmision laws might of forced them. Perhaps?
____________________
Current: ZZR1400
Previous: ZXR 400 L9, ZX-7R P5, ZZR 400, ZX-7R P6, Bandit 600, GSXR 750 Slingshot, DRZ400, DR650, ZX10R C1H, ZXR 750 L1, ZXR 750 L3, '99 ZX7R P4, KTM 300 EXC, ZX-9R E1, TDM850
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:35 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

No real technical problems. BMW were selling fuel injected bikes in the early 1980s (as were Kawasaki), even ignoring the turbo bikes, and Bimota and Ducati were selling pretty high performance injected bikes by the late 1980s (and even Moto Guzzi were selling injected versions of their bikes).

Trouble is cost. Fuel injection costs far more. From memory the kind of difference quoted was £40 for a bank of 4 carbs compared to £150 for an equivalent fuel injection system (prices in bulk to a factory). Even now if I wanted to buy new parts for a bike at retail prices it would cost a fortune to do it with fuel injection even compared to some top of the range flat slides (let alone some of the budget Mikuni RS flat slides).

When carbs work pretty well on a bike (small cylinder, high gas speed, individual carb per cylinder) there was little point in adding a fairly large amount to the final cost of a vehicle.

I suspect that they were largely forced into it to get round emissions rules.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:37 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Re: Bike FI - why did it take so long? Reply with quote

Damofo D.O.G. wrote:
...What was the technical problems encountered with FI which held it up for so long?...

Introduction of new engines.
In the bike world an engine design is tweaked and fettled and used in various guises and bikes for decades. For some reason the companies do not design new engines on a whim. They'd rather use tried and tested technology.
Therefore the need to design a FI system for an engine is a big undertaking.

As said above FI must now be used to meet emission regulations. This is the reason for many bikes being discontinued over recent years.

Despite your sweeping comments the likes of BMW have been using FI engines for decades. That's mainly because it is a car engine! However, BMW do understand it quite well.

HTH Thumbs Up
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:47 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Re: Bike FI - why did it take so long? Reply with quote

map wrote:
Despite your sweeping comments the likes of BMW have been using FI engines for decades. That's mainly because it is a car engine! However, BMW do understand it quite well.


It is not a car engine (twin cams were not common in BMWs at the time), and the fuel injection system is not the dodgy old K jetronic system common in cars at the time.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Blau Zedong This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:37 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

So in actual fact it is nothing to do with carbs being easier to get working well then FI, just a matter of cost and weight. Makes more sense to me.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:49 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Takes a pretty good fuel injection system to get better results than a decent set of carbs.

Used to be a pretty standard trick when tuning cars to dump the fuel injection and go to a pair of decent carbs. The Alfa 33s lost power when they went from having twin choke down draft webers / Dellortos to Bosch fuel injection (and that was a multi point fuel injection system, not a cheapy single point setup). From 118hp to 110hp on the 1.7 for example.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:54 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

So why is that then? Is it because carbs are 'self regulating' - i.e. fuelling reactive to the actual airflow, rather relying on a compromised map (can only have so many data points), which may have poor input data (due to poor sensors).

Are the FI jets not as good as carb jets either?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:07 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Old off hand comment was that fuel injection gave engines what they needed, carbs gave them what they wanted.

Reality is pobably more down to how bad basic fuel injection setups are. Single throttle bodies miles from the valves, tortuous intakes, restrictive air flow meters (or just using slow reacting MAP sensor based systems), no tuned length intakes. Add to that the difficulty in doing any kind of remapping for fuel injection (add ons like Power Commanders are pretty recent), except by burning a new chip (and even that is not always possible). They were pretty much designed to be cheap and run cleanly for emissions just strangely marketted as a performance thing.

Even worse are the psuedo efi Bosch K jetronic systems (basically use a balanced wedge in the air flow to just adjust the flow to some continuous injectors), which were used on loads of 80s cars (eg, XR3i, Golf GTI, etc).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

the grim reaper
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:35 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Re: Bike FI - why did it take so long? Reply with quote

map wrote:
Damofo D.O.G. wrote:
...What was the technical problems encountered with FI which held it up for so long?...

Introduction of new engines.
In the bike world an engine design is tweaked and fettled and used in various guises and bikes for decades. For some reason the companies do not design new engines on a whim. They'd rather use tried and tested technology.
Therefore the need to design a FI system for an engine is a big undertaking.

As said above FI must now be used to meet emission regulations. This is the reason for many bikes being discontinued over recent years.

HTH Thumbs Up


Nah, it wasn't the introduction of new engines at all, it's relatively simple to bodge an FI system onto an engine that used to have carbs (Varadero, Blackbird etc), the FI requirement was purely down to emissions for new bikes, hence, as mentioned in this thread, the discontinuation of certain models.

Cost is and always will be the driving factor behind bike evolution, except in the 'money no object' bikes like the MV F4CC and the NR750. All others are built to a budget.

In certain cases, like the Blackbird and Varadero, Honda saw bikes that were still selling well but were going to fail to meet new emissions regs, hence the switch to FI.

Other bikes, like the Fazer 600 and 1000 were ditched in favour of a new bike in the FZS6 and FZ1. Probably because they were old hat and didn't keep up with the competition.

Cheers

Grim
____________________
Adverts don't always work: Remember that advert, where the army are running across the desert and they have a wounded man on a stretcher. They get to a ravine, the bridge is down and a caption pops up that says, 'What are you thinking?'. I don't know about you but I was thinking, 'Christ, I'm glad I'm not in the f***ing army'.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:53 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Re: Bike FI - why did it take so long? Reply with quote

the grim reaper wrote:
...it's relatively simple to bodge an FI system onto an engine that used to have carbs (Varadero, Blackbird etc), the FI requirement was purely down to emissions for new bikes...

May be simple but can be a pain to setup right on an old engine design.
The first generation Blackbirds with FI were slated and it took a while to sort.

By comparison notice they didn't bother with the likes of the Pan-European but went the new engine route instead (as the ST1100 was getting long in the tooth anyhow).

As a side issue FI helps with fuel economy as it can be shut off while 'coasting' whereas fuel is always flowing through a carb.
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy


Last edited by map on 18:00 - 15 Dec 2008; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:58 - 15 Dec 2008    Post subject: Re: Bike FI - why did it take so long? Reply with quote

map wrote:
May be simple but can be a pain to setup right on an old engine design.
The first generation Blackbirds with FI were slated and it took a while to sort.


That is more Hondas pathetic setting up of the fuel injection, and can be sorted quite easily by a half decent custom map (but then the custom map probably wouldn't pass emission tests).

map wrote:
As a side issue FI helps with fuel economy as it can be shut off while 'coasting' whereas fuel is always flowing through a carb.


Could be done with carbs as well if required. Merely have a valve to cut the idle jet when vacuum after the butterfly is too high.

That said, cutting the fuel when coasting is one of the worst ways to trigger a jerky throttle response on a crude fuel injection system.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 310 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.8 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 87.9 Kb