|
|
| Author |
Message |
| D O G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 D O G World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Faldo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Faldo World Chat Champion

Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 13:28 - 15 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
I don't think manufacturer's wanted to use FI, but emmision laws might of forced them. Perhaps? ____________________ Current: ZZR1400
Previous: ZXR 400 L9, ZX-7R P5, ZZR 400, ZX-7R P6, Bandit 600, GSXR 750 Slingshot, DRZ400, DR650, ZX10R C1H, ZXR 750 L1, ZXR 750 L3, '99 ZX7R P4, KTM 300 EXC, ZX-9R E1, TDM850 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 13:35 - 15 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
No real technical problems. BMW were selling fuel injected bikes in the early 1980s (as were Kawasaki), even ignoring the turbo bikes, and Bimota and Ducati were selling pretty high performance injected bikes by the late 1980s (and even Moto Guzzi were selling injected versions of their bikes).
Trouble is cost. Fuel injection costs far more. From memory the kind of difference quoted was £40 for a bank of 4 carbs compared to £150 for an equivalent fuel injection system (prices in bulk to a factory). Even now if I wanted to buy new parts for a bike at retail prices it would cost a fortune to do it with fuel injection even compared to some top of the range flat slides (let alone some of the budget Mikuni RS flat slides).
When carbs work pretty well on a bike (small cylinder, high gas speed, individual carb per cylinder) there was little point in adding a fairly large amount to the final cost of a vehicle.
I suspect that they were largely forced into it to get round emissions rules.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Blau Zedong |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 Blau Zedong Banned

Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| D O G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 D O G World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:49 - 15 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Takes a pretty good fuel injection system to get better results than a decent set of carbs.
Used to be a pretty standard trick when tuning cars to dump the fuel injection and go to a pair of decent carbs. The Alfa 33s lost power when they went from having twin choke down draft webers / Dellortos to Bosch fuel injection (and that was a multi point fuel injection system, not a cheapy single point setup). From 118hp to 110hp on the 1.7 for example.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| D O G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 D O G World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 15:07 - 15 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Old off hand comment was that fuel injection gave engines what they needed, carbs gave them what they wanted.
Reality is pobably more down to how bad basic fuel injection setups are. Single throttle bodies miles from the valves, tortuous intakes, restrictive air flow meters (or just using slow reacting MAP sensor based systems), no tuned length intakes. Add to that the difficulty in doing any kind of remapping for fuel injection (add ons like Power Commanders are pretty recent), except by burning a new chip (and even that is not always possible). They were pretty much designed to be cheap and run cleanly for emissions just strangely marketted as a performance thing.
Even worse are the psuedo efi Bosch K jetronic systems (basically use a balanced wedge in the air flow to just adjust the flow to some continuous injectors), which were used on loads of 80s cars (eg, XR3i, Golf GTI, etc).
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| the grim reaper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 the grim reaper World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:35 - 15 Dec 2008 Post subject: Re: Bike FI - why did it take so long? |
 |
|
| map wrote: | | Damofo D.O.G. wrote: | ...What was the technical problems encountered with FI which held it up for so long?... |
Introduction of new engines.
In the bike world an engine design is tweaked and fettled and used in various guises and bikes for decades. For some reason the companies do not design new engines on a whim. They'd rather use tried and tested technology.
Therefore the need to design a FI system for an engine is a big undertaking.
As said above FI must now be used to meet emission regulations. This is the reason for many bikes being discontinued over recent years.
HTH  |
Nah, it wasn't the introduction of new engines at all, it's relatively simple to bodge an FI system onto an engine that used to have carbs (Varadero, Blackbird etc), the FI requirement was purely down to emissions for new bikes, hence, as mentioned in this thread, the discontinuation of certain models.
Cost is and always will be the driving factor behind bike evolution, except in the 'money no object' bikes like the MV F4CC and the NR750. All others are built to a budget.
In certain cases, like the Blackbird and Varadero, Honda saw bikes that were still selling well but were going to fail to meet new emissions regs, hence the switch to FI.
Other bikes, like the Fazer 600 and 1000 were ditched in favour of a new bike in the FZS6 and FZ1. Probably because they were old hat and didn't keep up with the competition.
Cheers
Grim ____________________ Adverts don't always work: Remember that advert, where the army are running across the desert and they have a wounded man on a stretcher. They get to a ravine, the bridge is down and a caption pops up that says, 'What are you thinking?'. I don't know about you but I was thinking, 'Christ, I'm glad I'm not in the f***ing army'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 17 years, 310 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|