|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Josh91 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Josh91 Nova Slayer
Joined: 06 May 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Josh91 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Josh91 Nova Slayer
Joined: 06 May 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Biker101 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Biker101 Traffic Copper

Joined: 22 Jan 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Josh91 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Josh91 Nova Slayer
Joined: 06 May 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Biker101 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Biker101 Traffic Copper

Joined: 22 Jan 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Zimbo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Zimbo World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 20:04 - 27 Jul 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
If acceleration is really important to you, a restricted 600 IL4 may not be your best bet.
Jap 4 cylinder 600s tend to rev really high and to make most of their power high in the rev range, with not much torque at the bottom end.
By restricting it to 33bhp you are effectively cutting off the top end power rush, and are left with the weedy bottom end.
Single or twin cylinder bikes tend to rev much slower and develop their torque far lower in the rev range, and are therefore far less affected by the restriction.
Finally, a 600 sports bike may look pretty, but as a new rider you should consider that they tend to be track focussed, unforgiving machines with twitchy handling, they may not let you get away with mistakes as easily as many other, less track focussed bikes, and also that they are covered in very expensive plastic that costs a lot to repair when you drop it, which you are quite likely to do at some stage as a new rider . . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 20:08 - 27 Jul 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Zimbo wrote: | If acceleration is really important to you, a restricted 600 IL4 may not be your best bet.
Jap 4 cylinder 600s tend to rev really high and to make most of their power high in the rev range, with not much torque at the bottom end.
By restricting it to 33bhp you are effectively cutting off the top end power rush, and are left with the weedy bottom end.
Single or twin cylinder bikes tend to rev much slower and develop their torque far lower in the rev range, and are therefore far less affected by the restriction.
Finally, a 600 sports bike may look pretty, but as a new rider you should consider that they tend to be track focussed, unforgiving machines with twitchy handling, they may not let you get away with mistakes as easily as many other, less track focussed bikes, and also that they are covered in very expensive plastic that costs a lot to repair when you drop it, which you are quite likely to do at some stage as a new rider . . . . |
We are talking about a GSR600 rather than a GSXR600, and in actual fact restricting a Ducati or SV650 to 33bhp has the same kind of effect, you just get less revs to play with!
Weight is the most important consideration, and as such a GSR600 should be fine. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 197 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|