|
|
| Which will be the main form of propulsion 40years in the future? |
| Hyper Efficient Internal Combustion Engines |
|
36% |
[ 4 ] |
| Hydrogen Fuel Cells |
|
63% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 11 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Poseidon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Poseidon World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:26 - 05 Dec 2009 Post subject: Is Hydrogen fuel cell tecnology the future? |
 |
|
I was having a debate with a collegue and he was waffling on about how hydrogen is the fuel of tomorrow and we'll all be driving cars powered by fuel cells. I told him it was a load of bollocks as there is far too much money in the petrochem industry. His main arguments are:
It's 100% clean
I said that the electricity used for electrolysing sea water will probably be from fossil fuels. That is until 100% renewable energy is being produced (can't see it myself). Also modern injection systems and better cats are getting petrol/diesel emissions close to the 0% pollutants mark
Car will still look and drive like normal cars
Fair point, but you've taken an already potential hazard of driving a vehicle carrying highly inflammable liquid and made it worse as you would be driving a vehicle with highly explosive gas on board. Also, what about motorbikes, what about haulage??? are they going over to fuel cells?
It'll save the planet so governments will support it
!?! WTF... since when do governments care about doing good deeds? I pointed out that there is far too much money invested in internal conbustion engine manufacture/service/repair and fuel production/distribution. No-one will allow a clean burning engine that has no moving parts (therefore lower service costs) to enter the roads in large numbers! I can't see it ever happening in our lifetimes. The fact that governements will wage phoney wars on each other for oil says that they don't give a monkeys about going green!
My theory is that hyper-efficiency is the way forward. It's still internal combution engines, still burns liquid fuel so all the relevant service/maintanence/fuel distribution/duty will still be there, which will keep all the big multinationals (who, lets face it, are actually the ones running countries nowadays) happy. Engines capable of 150+mpg are on the horizon. Even if fossil fuels run dry, there's still bio-fuels, which are also getting a lot of investment. Hydrogen fuel cells are just too radical and pose too much of a threat to too many industries. It's a nice idea, but come on, we'd be starting from scratch again with the idea of propulsion, we've got a 150year head start on internal combustion engines!
I'm not saying that one is better than the other, I'm just being realistic about what the future will hold. So when you cast your vote, you are not voting for which you think is the better concept, you're voting for which one you think will most likely be around in 40years time! ____________________ 1977 Honda CG125
2002 Ducati Monster S4 (currently restoring) |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| LeeR |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 LeeR World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:33 - 05 Dec 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
As soon as they invent a cost effective material, that hydrogen atoms don't "evaporate" through we're on to a winner.
Of course the energy required to extract and process the hydrogen in the first place has to come from somewhere...
Having said that it'll have to happen, otherwise it's back to the horse or walking. ____________________ My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 19:36 - 05 Dec 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I think it will be fuel cells tbh, and the fuel cells will be designed to fail within X number of years.
In that the ICE engine is somewhat inefficient no matter how we improve it it can be no more than 30-40% While fuel cells 60%+ (I read these from somewhere do not quote me)
However the normal players will still be in operation, in that I think either hydrogen will be electrolysed via nuclear or solar power using solar thermal and heliostats in the deserts, guess who has an awful lot of desert? , North Africa and the current Arab oil states.
Such a situation would mean that we can use pretty much the same infrastructure as we do now with some modifications hence electrolysation occurs in Saudi, is stuck on a modified LPG tanker and pumped to a refinery in the UK which is converted less for cracking by more for storage which is then ferried to petrol stations (the infrastructure of already exists).
However because this is the simple cost effective option the government most definately will NOT opt for this option and the fact that you can make your own hydrogen means you can quite effectively dodge any taxes put onto the hydrogen from fuel stations (note this might be a reason why the UK government wants to install 'smart' meters into everybody's homes by 2020).
Means they will combine this with a gallileo based tracking system, thats if by 2020 you can afford to drive. ____________________ Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Poseidon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Poseidon World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lostboy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lostboy Crazy Courier

Joined: 03 Sep 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Poseidon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Poseidon World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 19:43 - 05 Dec 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Some ways I agree with you.
However fuel cells are very efficient and have no dodgy emissions at the point of use (although you can also fuel them with fossil fuels). I doubt that they will be used fueled by hydrogen, as it takes a lot of energy to split water to give hydrogen and hydrogen is very difficult to store. Not only is it explosive but very difficult to seal systems to prevent it leaking (hydrogen is a tiny atom, and leaks out of just about anything).
However IC engines are pretty inefficient (although they can also run on hydrogen), and not sure how much more they can improve their efficiency.
Suspect more likely would be fuel cells using alcohol.
Al the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ZRX61 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ZRX61 Victor Meldrew
Joined: 05 Nov 2003 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Cigaro |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Cigaro World Chat Champion
Joined: 28 Mar 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 13:53 - 07 Dec 2009 Post subject: Re: Is Hydrogen fuel cell tecnology the future? |
 |
|
| Mister Drewie wrote: | I was having a debate with a collegue and he was waffling on about how hydrogen is the fuel of tomorrow and we'll all be driving cars powered by fuel cells. I told him it was a load of bollocks as there is far too much money in the petrochem industry. His main arguments are:
 It's 100% clean
I said that the electricity used for electrolysing sea water will probably be from fossil fuels.
|
Probably nuclear power, which (IMO) is a very safe and efficient way to generate power. And one day we will have two choices for energy - nuclear power, or renewable energy. They'll both be used in abundance.
| Mister Drewie wrote: |  Car will still look and drive like normal cars
Fair point, but you've taken an already potential hazard of driving a vehicle carrying highly inflammable liquid and made it worse as you would be driving a vehicle with highly explosive gas on board.
|
I'm sure I read somewhere that hydrogen isn't much more dangerous than petrol inside a car, and that in an accident it will vent to the atmosphere very quickly and with much less risk of explosion. They are also working on clever ways to 'lock it up' inside other materials such as metal hydrides, which can be stored in solid pellet form.
| Mister Drewie wrote: | Also, what about motorbikes, what about haulage??? are they going over to fuel cells? |
Yes, and yes. Aprilla have been working on it, and another company has a working prototype called the ENV.
| Mister Drewie wrote: |
 It'll save the planet so governments will support it
!?! WTF... since when do governments care about doing good deeds? |
Unfortunately I agree with you here. The government will use excuses not to implement fuel cell technology and clean power. An example that shocked me was that until recently councils had to adopt government guidelines on traffic light timing to keep people waiting to increase revenue from fuel tax. They don't have to do it any more but I'm sure some still do.
I've taken to turning my engine off at traffic lights just so I don't give them the satisfaction
I believe fuel cell vehicles can be fast, efficient and even good fun to drive. There are teething troubles but I think the biggest problem is the uptake, as I described above (even the infrastructure issue can be worked around).
Like with anything else, we won't start using this technology properly until it's too late. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 282 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|