Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


If SV1000 had a much heavier flywheel,

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

kawashima
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:55 - 15 Mar 2010    Post subject: If SV1000 had a much heavier flywheel, Reply with quote

will it run at low rev like cruiser motor?
____________________
own:2020 Serow 250
owned: 2012 YB125SP, 2008 TDM900, 2005 W650, 2002 LS125R, 2002 CB400SF, NS50F, C50 / Trip to UK(2009), Hokkaido touring(2013)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

EnergyInducti...
Crazy Courier



Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:03 - 15 Mar 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well no, it just means it would take longer to build up revs, And would keep its revs better when the engine should be slowing down even under full power (E.g. up a hill in a much taller gear)
low revs are due to a longer stroke, which increases instability in the crankshaft as revs increase.
Correct me if I'm wrong here! I only know what I've learnt from my own studies lol
____________________
Riding: Yamaha RXS100
Aiming for : RD350 + Test
Dream bike: Suzi RG500 Gamma
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:12 - 15 Mar 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

A heavy flywheel can make the motor (but not the transmission) less snatchy and smoother at lower engine speeds, so it could make an SV1000 run more smoothly at lower revs.

However, it would be slower to rev and to slow down. Generally a low revving motor would have a longer stroke combined with a heavier flywheel, and of course the correct cams, fuelling and electrics to suit.

I can see why you're thinking about it, I always find Japanese engines too bloody revvy. I'd like to get a big Japanese V-twin cruiser and get some weight into the flywheel one of these days, but that's not so easy in itself. Modern bikes don't have a proper flywheel like cars, although some classic bikes did. You would probably need to find a way to add weight to the clutch basket and/or balancer mechanism.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kawashima
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:06 - 15 Mar 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

snaphappyalex wrote:
Well no, it just means it would take longer to build up revs, And would keep its revs better when the engine should be slowing down even under full power (E.g. up a hill in a much taller gear)
low revs are due to a longer stroke, which increases instability in the crankshaft as revs increase.
Correct me if I'm wrong here! I only know what I've learnt from my own studies lol

Thanks. Longer stroke(ratio?) is more important than flywheel.

Robby wrote:
A heavy flywheel can make the motor (but not the transmission) less snatchy and smoother at lower engine speeds, so it could make an SV1000 run more smoothly at lower revs.

However, it would be slower to rev and to slow down. Generally a low revving motor would have a longer stroke combined with a heavier flywheel, and of course the correct cams, fuelling and electrics to suit.

I can see why you're thinking about it, I always find Japanese engines too bloody revvy. I'd like to get a big Japanese V-twin cruiser and get some weight into the flywheel one of these days, but that's not so easy in itself. Modern bikes don't have a proper flywheel like cars, although some classic bikes did. You would probably need to find a way to add weight to the clutch basket and/or balancer mechanism.

Reading your response, I noticed that there are many aspects which make suitable for low rev power, not only flywheel weight.
I wondered if a heavier flywheel will make an engine which has both MT-01 bottom end and SV1000 top end, but it was too optimistic Doh!
____________________
own:2020 Serow 250
owned: 2012 YB125SP, 2008 TDM900, 2005 W650, 2002 LS125R, 2002 CB400SF, NS50F, C50 / Trip to UK(2009), Hokkaido touring(2013)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:29 - 15 Mar 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

kawashima wrote:

Thanks. Longer stroke(ratio?) is more important than flywheel.


A piston can only move so fast, and has to stop at the top and bottom, so if it must travel further it will do so less often and the rev's will be lower. This is why larger engines rev lower than smaller ones.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 206 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.06 Sec - Server Load: 0.53 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 46.29 Kb