|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Whosthedaddy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Whosthedaddy Super Spammer
Joined: 11 Dec 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 07:40 - 13 May 2010 Post subject: Would an SM be the answer? |
 |
|
I am getting sick and tired of the shoddy roads on the inner city London roads as part of my commute, this couple with just as bad tarmac at my end of the journey too. The vibrations and bouncing was enough to shake a back box off and then a month or so later break the metal support bracket too (even though empty).
Its a nightmare on the throttle, either belting it along to absorb as much as possible or plodding about and being bounced all over the place.
Grrrr.
Now, I did look at the KTM 690 and Ducati baby hypomotard, could a SM be of better use on the pole holed urban sprint? ____________________ Current : MSX 125 Past : CBR 900RR Monkeybike : c50 LAC : ZXR750 H2 : FZR600 : ZX7R P3 : YW100 : TRX850: Trophy 900 T309 : GSXR 600 L0: Monkeybike : XJ6S Whosthedaddy |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Frost |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Frost World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 May 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 08:01 - 13 May 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Mate had a 660SMC, the bike managed to shake it's own side stand off on smooth roads
If i lived in central london i'd have a SM just for the ease of low speed riding, and visibility given due to the higher seating position etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Irezumi aka Reuben |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Irezumi aka Reuben Carrot Top
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| boundy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 boundy Nearly there...

Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| delvey91 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 delvey91 Crazy Courier

Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 12:42 - 13 May 2010 Post subject: Re: Would an SM be the answer? |
 |
|
A trail style bike can have softer suspension and not still bottom out under harsh braking/cornering (and both together).
The softer suspension will help smooth out the bumps.
The longer travel shouldn't help, however much we complain about roads in the UK - none are THAT bad!.. however of course as above can mean softer suspension is more practical.
Oddly enough, a commutermoto may actually be better for smoothing out bumps because they tend to be a lot heavier - so there's more momentum and a better ratio of sprung to unsprung weight.
The 690 is the smoothest of the three decent lightweight big cc trail/supermoto bikes I rode.
Note the standard 690SM (not SMC) and Dukes weigh more than the enduro/SMC version. However, if I'm paying for a light weight 'sporty' bike, that's what I want to get .
Welcome to have a go on my 690 sometime if you're over this way.
As I've gone on about before - if you do lots of tight filtering, you will probably find the SMs a bit limiting - there's enough cases where I'd take my GSXR between a gap, but physically wouldn't be able to fit the KTMs bars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:08 - 13 May 2010 Post subject: Re: Would an SM be the answer? |
 |
|
| G wrote: | A trail style bike can have softer suspension and not still bottom out under harsh braking/cornering (and both together).
The softer suspension will help smooth out the bumps.
The longer travel shouldn't help, however much we complain about roads in the UK - none are THAT bad!.. however of course as above can mean softer suspension is more practical.
Oddly enough, a commutermoto may actually be better for smoothing out bumps because they tend to be a lot heavier - so there's more momentum and a better ratio of sprung to unsprung weight.
The 690 is the smoothest of the three decent lightweight big cc trail/supermoto bikes I rode.
Note the standard 690SM (not SMC) and Dukes weigh more than the enduro/SMC version. However, if I'm paying for a light weight 'sporty' bike, that's what I want to get  .
Welcome to have a go on my 690 sometime if you're over this way.
As I've gone on about before - if you do lots of tight filtering, you will probably find the SMs a bit limiting - there's enough cases where I'd take my GSXR between a gap, but physically wouldn't be able to fit the KTMs bars. |
I find this but rarely, as i've said before I find the sterring lock more of a problem than the wideness of the bars. There are plenty of other reason why my TDM is better than you GSXR for commuting but we will not go into that now
I have found it is fairly easy to wiggle through gaps smaller than the bike with a mixture of leaning and counter steering. ____________________ Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Whosthedaddy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Whosthedaddy Super Spammer
Joined: 11 Dec 2005 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:54 - 13 May 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Whosthedaddy wrote: | When I sat on the SM's it didn't feel natural nor did it feel bad. The idea of having nothing between your legs (big fuel tank) was a little worrying and the wind blast would be tiresome. However, averaging a fair bit over the NSL for the 15 -20 miles before the remaining 15 odd miles of 30/40mph starts, I'm lucky to have a clean licence still.
| chris-red wrote: | I love my TDM for London work, comfy, tall and with real punchy power, it is also a big looking bike and has a big turning circle. It's not exactly a SM but it is of a similar type of bike. |
Mines the TRX so TDM but smaller and more sporty. A TDM was parked next to me a while back and quite a bit bigger really!
What the hell is a commuter moto when its at home?
Other option maybe is an enduro, but being even taller and wider maybe not even worth thinking about.
Maybe there is something to the likes of a pan or big comfy Beemer? |
I feel the TDM is still a fairly narrow bike, (for something with bars) the main benefit from the TDM is more visablity, more comfortable and a better turning circle. ____________________ Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:10 - 13 May 2010 Post subject: Re: Would an SM be the answer? |
 |
|
Enduro bikes tend to use the same bars as supermoto bikes.
A commutermoto style but with low power and lots of weight generally – for instance I believe the XT660 range has around the weight of my GSXR, but only 2/3rs the power of my 690, which weighs a decent chunk less and has better components.
I do fairly often find myself filtering on the GSXR in situations I wouldn’t on the KTM. Until having ridden the KTM and ZX9 etc back to back, I wouldn’t have said sports bike either. In such situations, there isn’t another way generally – the traffic is tight for a reason and I’ve chosen the route that offers the most width. I’m not going to expect on coming traffic to get out of my way when there’s a double decker bus very close to the other side of it!
The narrowness easily makes up for the need for a little planning (or wheel spinning) for me.
Oh and it’s definitely got ‘punchy power’ when it’s needed . |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Whosthedaddy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Whosthedaddy Super Spammer
Joined: 11 Dec 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 14:40 - 13 May 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Commuting in Lonon has turned me from mild mannered to racing and beating couriers through the traffic and shouting at cars on the way.
I find that even though 'bigger' than the peds, I can actually filter just as fast as them and often beating them when they've gone on the other side of the road and I've stuck to down the middle of the cars.
Clip ons do seem like a good idea, nice and narrow, low and easily directions easily changed.
A sports bike on the roads just doesn't? ____________________ Current : MSX 125 Past : CBR 900RR Monkeybike : c50 LAC : ZXR750 H2 : FZR600 : ZX7R P3 : YW100 : TRX850: Trophy 900 T309 : GSXR 600 L0: Monkeybike : XJ6S Whosthedaddy |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 224 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|