|
|
| Author |
Message |
| jay12329 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jay12329 Dr. Evil

Joined: 02 May 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:14 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: What are Triumph up to??!! |
 |
|
https://triumphadventure.com/
Looks like a new tiger thing, and maybe a more off road biased variant.
J |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| bathtub |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 bathtub Two Stroke Sniffer

Joined: 10 Nov 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dom |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dom World Chat Champion

Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 17:43 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Ooh. Stupid website though. No doubt some spy pics will be all over the place long before those other videos have gone live as well, so I'm not sure what the point is.
Out of curiosity, did any of the recent Tiger's have any off roady bits in their promo materials? If it did then this is probably nothing to get excited about. ____________________ Photos and that |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| SamJL |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 SamJL Nearly there...

Joined: 14 Aug 2009 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dom |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dom World Chat Champion

Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:05 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Not going to happen. If they can't beat or equal the BMW S1000RR then they'll be seen to have failed. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:06 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Sadly I suspect we're talking a GS/super tenere competitor, but I would love to see a detuned 675 based one. As it's pretty thin at the mo, there's some definite potential to add longer travel suspension, a high level exhaust (along with a few bits of protection) and wide bars - mine weighs 175kg with a bit of fuel, so get somewhere not too far off that and you've got a really useful/usable bike.
Interesting, despite slagging it off, the multistrada did pretty well at Pikes Peak this year - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5JQdgvzuL0&fmt=22#t=2m02s - however I suspect that's more from being fast on the roads versus the supermotos, then being good in the dirt. And remember an R1 did pretty well on the all-dirt Erzburg hill climb day.
Sam: the litre bike market is now even more glogged up. In the 600 market you can get a bit of variation with more torque; however even the big twins are probably going to be lacking to the BMW for 'go' in gear I suspect. I doubt they can come near the beemer on price per performance, so not sure it'd be a good bike to release. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Spit-Fire |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Spit-Fire World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:21 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Probably by people with £12500 to spend on a bike . |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Spit-Fire |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Spit-Fire World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:28 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
lol,
so did every one here buy their bike based on the press acclaiming it better then its rivals in its class?
the bmw is not the best seller to my knowledge..... so bhp and lap times performed by some one likely more talented then your self cant be the only deciding factor in ones purchase right?
i dont see how making a good bike could be a "fail" just because its "not better" then another
 ____________________ they say the good die young... i say we just live faster |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:38 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Spit-Fire wrote: | lol,
so did every one here buy their bike based on the press acclaiming it better then its rivals in its class?
the bmw is not the best seller to my knowledge..... so bhp and lap times performed by some one likely more talented then your self cant be the only deciding factor in ones purchase right?
i dont see how making a good bike could be a "fail" just because its "not better" then another
 |
Spit Fire: TT600. I rest my case.
To clarify, the TT600 was a good bike with a couple of niggles, and it wasn't *quite* as good as contemporary 600s and so it was lashed in the biking press. Seriously, a Daytona 1000 would have to be better or similar than the S1000RR to be considered anything but a failure.
Plus I suspect the Beemer would be the bestseller if the Blade, ZX10 and GSXR1000 were all £12k. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 19:06 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| MarJay wrote: |
To clarify, the TT600 was a good bike with a couple of niggles, and it wasn't *quite* as good as contemporary 600s and so it was lashed in the biking press. Seriously, a Daytona 1000 would have to be better or similar than the S1000RR to be considered anything but a failure. |
It was also a clone aimed at the CBR600, so other than the badge nothing extra to persuade people to buy it. Not a different engine, different styling, different exhaust note, different suspension, etc.
Make something that is competitive (doesn't have to be class leading) but which offers something unique that people want and you will get decent sales.
A 1L V6 could be that (while maintaining their link to 3 cylinders, just a pair of 3s nailed together), and while it would cost more it would possibly not cost as much extra to make as they could charge extra for its uniqueness. A 1350cc V6 could be rather rapid.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Digitalize |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Digitalize Nearly there...

Joined: 09 Aug 2009 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Spit-Fire |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Spit-Fire World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:27 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| MarJay wrote: |
Spit Fire: TT600. I rest my case. |
on one example? lol
the yamaha R6 in 2006 was the best seller..... it wasn't proclaimed the best supersport though,
| MarJay wrote: | Seriously, a Daytona 1000 would have to be better or similar than the S1000RR to be considered anything but a failure. |
define better? your assuming the market all think alike.
who said what you like about a bike i will also?
| MarJay wrote: | Plus I suspect the Beemer would be the bestseller if the Blade, ZX10 and GSXR1000 were all £12k. | how much are the japs again?
| G wrote: | Most modern sports bikes are very similar - for a good reason because they have all been designed to be very good and there's only so far you can adjust the basic well-researched formula.
People buy existing bikes on various grounds, such as brand or model loyalty. Some people would buy a Triumph just because it's British, |
| Kickstart wrote: |
Make something that is competitive (doesn't have to be class leading) but which offers something unique that people want and you will get decent sales.
|
i agree with the above.
and this is my point, people base there purpose of purchase on some many different things it would be ignorant to say unless its the best in the class it a "fail"
i bet manufacture wish the formula to success was that simple ____________________ they say the good die young... i say we just live faster |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| colin1 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 colin1 Captain Safety
Joined: 17 Feb 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 21:58 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Spit-Fire wrote: |
the yamaha R6 in 2006 was the best seller..... it wasn't proclaimed the best supersport though,
|
It was considered pretty damn good though, I believe.
We're talking the difference between 'good' sales, which the 675 did have that year too I believe and bad sales/reviews, which I believe is quite likely for a 1050 based superbike.
| Quote: | define better? your assuming the market all think alike.
who said what you like about a bike i will also?
|
The vast majority of people with £12500 to spend on a new model of sports bike will be doing on it's abilities I reckon. A few brand loyalty, looks etc, but I would expect the vast majority of performance.
Other genres less so, but sports bikes the SPORTS it's reasonable to assume is going to be a big aspect.
| Quote: | how much are the japs again? |
RRP seems to be around R1 £12500, ZX10R £10290, CBR £11,370 and GSXR £10440. I know if I had that much to spend I would definitely be spending £12500 on the BMW - sure the others will sell well in reality, including the R1 which has got pretty slated for it's engine from many sides. However these are bikes with an established fan base and I'd expect a lot more sales people trying to push them.
| Quote: | and this is my point, people base there purpose of purchase on some many different things it would be ignorant to say unless its the best in the class it a "fail" |
The question is 'would it sell well', I believe the answer is 'no' for a variety of reasons so it would be reasonable to class it as 'fail'.
If they tried to market it as a lighter Sprint, they might have more success, but the current sprint motor is a bit underwhelming to my mind, so I'd expect they'd need quite a lot of work on it.
| Quote: | The word Adventure, is just a fashionable way of saying touring possibly with a few unpaved roads thrown in. |
Not in the case of the KTM adventure models, or the Highland which I think did have an 'adventure' model. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| SamJL |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 SamJL Nearly there...

Joined: 14 Aug 2009 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 22:26 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
I honestly don't see what the big deal is with the S1000RR?? I have a couple of friends with them, they have a rubbish mid range, there pretty heavy in there class, and they see all the eletrics actually stop it being fun some of the time. They might make 15 - 20bhp more at the rear wheel, but its all right at the top. If you look at all the graphs, it gets killed up to around 10,000rpm the CBR. Fast Bikes did a test, the CBR beat it to 60mph, 100mph and on the 1/4 mile, its also got a shed more mid range. I think someone needs to come out with something, with the same top end as the BMW, but more mid range and less weight. The CBR is £10,321 as well by the way!
If I had £12.5k it wouldn't be getting spent on the BMW.
I am looking forward to the 2011 ZX10R though, there claiming big power and little weight, and it looks awesome!! Might be my next bike, Im going to wait until next year now and see what comes out, hopefully something pretty special! ____________________ 2009 CBR1000RR
2004 KTM 200SX
2004 KTM 65SX  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 22:36 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| SamJL wrote: | I honestly don't see what the big deal is with the S1000RR?? I have a couple of friends with them, they have a rubbish mid range, there pretty heavy in there class, and they see all the eletrics actually stop it being fun some of the time. They might make 15 - 20bhp more at the rear wheel, but its all right at the top. If you look at all the graphs, it gets killed up to around 10,000rpm the CBR. Fast Bikes did a test, the CBR beat it to 60mph, 100mph and on the 1/4 mile, its also got a shed more mid range. I think someone needs to come out with something, with the same top end as the BMW, but more mid range and less weight.
If I had £12.5k it wouldn't be getting spent on the BMW. |
To be honest, it doesn't matter what you or I think about a bike, it matters what the press think of a bike. And at the moment the BMW is the darling of the motorcycle press, and whatever you say about midrange its still 20bhp more powerful than the next most powerful bike, its still got traction control, ABS and linked brakes that make average riders look shit hot, and its still supposed to give a great ride quality. In last months Performance Bikes it completely trounced all of the competition. One journalist even said that this years R1 was like "Riding on marbles in comparison to the S1000RR".
I won't be surprised if next year all of the big four come out with litre bikes that make 200bhp and have traction control and all the rest of it, but Triumph aren't going to do it. They simply don't have the R&D budget. Anything that comes out now that doesn't have traction control, ABS, Switchable power modes etc etc, is going to be labelled a 'throwback' and stuff like that. Just look at the Thunderrace compared to the Fireblade, the ZX9R compared to the R1 etc etc. Triumph can't afford to build a copy of last years R1, and they aren't going to match the beemer. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Spit-Fire |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Spit-Fire World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 22:36 - 08 Jul 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| G wrote: |
It was considered pretty damn good though, I believe.
We're talking the difference between 'good' sales, which the 675 did have that year too. |
irc the press said it was to focused for the road, had a set up to stiff for British roads, and lacked midrange...... the 675 ranked higher in test but sold less
why?
| G wrote: | The vast majority of people with £12500 to spend on a new model of sports bike will be doing on it's abilities I reckon. A few brand loyalty, looks etc, but I would expect the vast majority of performance.
Other genres less so, but sports bikes the SPORTS it's reasonable to assume is going to be a big aspect. |
of course, its a performance bike, so performance is a big factor.
if i gave you a open cheque to go buy a 600 now, what would you buy?
| G wrote: | The question is 'would it sell well', I believe the answer is 'no' |
i also believe it wouldn't, for many reasons....but the question was actually would it have to be the best to sell well,
you and mayjay have been riding for many years,
has the best bike always sold the best?
or even the best car, the best computer
| G wrote: | RRP seems to be around R1 £12500, ZX10R £10290, CBR £11,370 and GSXR £10440. I know if I had that much to spend I would definitely be spending £12500 |
id likely buy the bmw as well ... but is it the best seller?
mayjay stated the price is the reason for this, but it retails at similar coin to its rivals
| MarJay wrote: | Many bike magazines (and me) maintain that Brand loyalty works with most types of bike except for supersports 600s and 1000cc superbikes. |
it does work in the two class's with the most branding
?
you have never heard any one say they "wont buy a ducati", or im a "honda man"
or some one that goes from one gsxr to the next,
or the fact that you can associate a racers name with a bike and it sells more
| MarJay wrote: | Due to the weakness of the pound, issues surrounding the yen, inflation and various other issues, litre bikes have all broken the £10k mark. Who's going to worry about spending another £2k on the fastest bestest bike out there? |
by your calculation it should be the best seller then no? ____________________ they say the good die young... i say we just live faster
Last edited by Spit-Fire on 22:40 - 08 Jul 2010; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Irezumi aka Reuben |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Irezumi aka Reuben Carrot Top
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 78 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|