Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Silverstone Motogp vs. WSBK lap times

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Racing & Trackdays
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Al
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:28 - 31 Jul 2010    Post subject: Silverstone Motogp vs. WSBK lap times Reply with quote

2'03.308 Jorge Lorenzo
Vs.
2'04.091 Cal Crutchlow

That time would have put Cruchlow 5th on the MotoGP grid!

With the vast amount of money the GP bikes cost to design and build is it really worth it for such a small difference compared to basically a tweaked production bike? especially over such a long lap.
____________________
Yamaha FZR400RR 3tj
My Instagram Thingy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:26 - 31 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're right in many ways, however, a few tenths in motor racing can cost a fortune. Also, the type of circuit can play a massive part so just choosing one to compare is not necessarily a fair comparison. To exaggerate the point, if a circuit was an oval you'd probably see hardly any difference. Also, different weather conditions will play a part (since the times aren't taken on the same day).

You also have to considering the technology/tuning restrictions are different for both classes. Given a free reign I imagine the differences would be much bigger. Finally, and importantly, there are no qualifying tyres in MotoGP this year so you'd expect those times to be closer.

Having said that, looking at the qualifying times from Donington Park last year;

MotoGP: Rossi: 1:28.116
WSBK: Spies: 1:29.846

Pretty close but the race pace looked different (we can't tell because it rained for MotoGP). So, check out the times at Assen;

Qualifying
MotoGP: Rossi, 1:36.025
WSBK: Spies, 1:37.626

Race
MotoGP: Rossi, 1:36.558
WSBK: Haga, 1:38.680

Bigger difference during the race itself.

I'd be really interested to know the laptime differences between (say) a World Touring Car (couple of hundred grand?) and an F1 car (couple of million?). Probably a lot bigger because bikes are limited by their design and an F1 car carries enormous corner speed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Al
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:05 - 31 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Silver wrote:

I'd be really interested to know the laptime differences between (say) a World Touring Car (couple of hundred grand?) and an F1 car (couple of million?). Probably a lot bigger because bikes are limited by their design and an F1 car carries enormous corner speed.


Well the only circuit that they have both raced at that I can find is Velencia which is a pretty tight track and there is 7sec between an F1 car and WTCC car in qualifing. So at least you feel your getting something for your millions of pounds of development.
____________________
Yamaha FZR400RR 3tj
My Instagram Thingy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:26 - 31 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. Like I said, I reckon the limitations of a bike's design (two wheels) is a bigger factor in the smaller difference in times between MotoGP and WSBK. You can only lean over so far and you can only put so much power through one wheel. Cars have much more potential in that area. Having said that though, 7 seconds is not too bad (IMHO) consider the TC/F1 vehicle designs are worlds apart.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Spit-Fire
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:12 - 31 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

what were the lap time differences when they were 990's?
____________________
they say the good die young... i say we just live faster
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:29 - 31 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spit-Fire wrote:
what were the lap time differences when they were 990's?


2005, Assen comparison:

Qualifying
MotoGP: Rossi, 1:58.936
WSBK: Vermeulen, 2:04.179

Race
MotoGP: Rossi, 2:00.991
WSBK: Vermeulen, 2:04.685

Weather was dry for both.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

robbieguy2003
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:34 - 03 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 990 shows a bigger difference. I suppose the GP bikes can lean a bit more/carry more corner speed/stop a bit quicker.. but in terms of top end/acceleration they cant have much in it, 800cc vs 1000cc - even with high revs, its still limited.

And now having 6 engines per season, thats got to screw it up a bit more as well.

Im surprised at only 7 seconds between F1 and WTCC for Valencia. I suppose it depends on the circuit though, I'd imagine on something like melbourne/silverstone where the aerodynamics come heavily into play in fast corners, the difference may be even greater.
____________________
Current Bikes: Honda CBR 600RR - '07, Suzuki GSX1250 FA ST '11
Old Bikes: Suzuki Intruder 125 LC - '2001, Honda CBR 600F - '92, Honda CBR 600RR - '03
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Deano
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:46 - 04 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

bit unfair on the gp bikes if you ask me, as they have to comply with the 6 engine rule, limited amount of fuel and they do have limitations on what materials they can use for bike parts so they cant do anything too extroadinary to make a technological leap as such., its more refinement.

superbikes arent just tweaked roadbikes, they modified from the groun up,the suspension is pretty much GP spec as far as I know, braced swingarms, carbon subframes and motors putting out over 220bhp with TC, launch crontrol. and Rossi commented that the pirelli tyres are better/easier to ride on than the bridgestones. 200cc advantage.

with retired GP projects on the grid, cough cough apprillia, BMW.

its the same pattern I remember when steve hislop lapped his r1 faster than rossi on his nsr500.
____________________
Dean Stone #777
EMRA 2012 final standings, Formula 600s 3rd, Superstock 600s 3rd.
www.triplesevenracing.co.uk: www.ljmotorcyclerepairs.co.uk www.gettaylored.co.uk BN RaceScience, Now officially run out of money to carry on racing Sad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
stone76567 This post is not being displayed because it has a low rating (Spam). Unhide this post / all posts.
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 15 years, 126 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Racing & Trackdays All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.06 Sec - Server Load: 0.78 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 63.12 Kb