Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Police pursuits and bikes

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

byke95
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:53 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Police pursuits and bikes Reply with quote

This goes on from Ste's post. Running from the police is one thing, but dealing with the consequences is another...

I Heard on the news last night that an investigation has been launched into an incident where a motorbike crashed into a lamppost after being pursued by the police, killing the pillion passenger and seriously injuring the rider. The investigation into wanting to determine if the 'chase' caused the accident.

I personally think if you're going to run from the police you should be pursued (within obvious safety limits in built up areas). If you then crash and kill yourself, it was your choice, not the fault of the police.

However this instance had a pillion on the back, should the police have backed off thinking this chase will endanger an 'innocent' or should they still chase - after all the pillion deceided to put their life in the hands of the rider (as all pillion do each time they climb on the back of a bike).

Anyone got any thoughts on this? Whatever, this rider will have to live with his actions for the rest of his life, I hope it weighs heavy on his mind....
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dusty
King of the Rim



Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:04 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think the police should pursue bikes as closely as they sometimes do, even if there is no pillion the bike could still hit pedestrians or another vehicle etc. From what I've seen on these police chase programs, the riders often panicks simply because they have no insurance, tax or have been banned in the past. Now although these are fairly serious offences I personally don't think they are worth putting the public at risk over.

I'm not saying the police shouldn't pursue bikes, just that I think they should do it at a bit of a distance, so as too not pressure the rider to the degree that they make it likely that they will crash. Also if there is a helicopter available I think the ground units should back right off and let the chopper crew guide them in for arrests once the rider has stopped the bike.
____________________
Gallery
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

yambabe
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:13 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dusty wrote:
because they have no insurance, tax or have been banned in the past. Now although these are fairly serious offences I personally don't think they are worth putting the public at risk over.


Don't you think that committing these offences in the first place is putting the public at risk then? Well OK maybe not riding without tax, but I suspect that most people who don't tax their bikes do so because they don't have insurance or mot, both of which could be considered to put people at risk.

Anyone who has been banned has normally had that ban for a reason, ususally because they have ridde/driven in a manner likely to cause harm to others and been caught doing it!

I agree with you about the police keeping a suitable distance and backing off a bit, but if you have cause to run you are probably illegal (otherwise why run?) and the very fact that you are on the road is therefore a danger to others.
____________________
Sod falling in love, I wanna fall in chocolate. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dusty
King of the Rim



Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:21 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Babyyam wrote:
Don't you think that committing these offences in the first place is putting the public at risk then?

No not really, my bike isn't taxed at the moment, but that alone doesn't mean I am any less safe when riding it, in fact I probably ride more carefully because it isn't taxed.

I agree that people who have been banned are sometimes dangerous riders, but then I know some very good riders who have been banned.

I'm not trying to say that it's alright to do any of these things, just that in my opinion a rider than has been banned, has no tax and no insurance, will not be as dangerous as a rider that has been banned, has no tax, no insurance and is panicking because he has a police car chasing him.

Penny Coin Penny Coin
____________________
Gallery
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Spiral
Traffic Copper



Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:27 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twisted Evil The Bronze take our pride Twisted Evil


If someone is stupid enough to run from the cops i think they have reason to use all and every means available to them to bring the person to justice.


so then the judge can give them a pathetic jail service!
____________________
****NORTHERN IRELAND NEWSFLASH!!**** According to a recent survey, 94% of loyalists said the best sex they ever had was in the shower; the other 6% haven't been to jail yet.***
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

dodsi
Dirty Carny



Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:34 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

...or a jolly good ticking off

all the police have to do is get the plates, and go to his house, as he thinks it will be clear, therefore not chasing the guy not putting him or her in danger for a £40 tax disc or something daft

unless its something serious,

check what spanish police did after a bank robbery...



https://media.ebaumsworld.com/index.php?e=spainbank.wmv
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

yambabe
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:39 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dusty wrote:
[I agree that people who have been banned are sometimes dangerous riders, but then I know some very good riders who have been banned.


So why have they been banned? Don't tell me - totting up points on speeding offences? Rolling Eyes

I know what you're saying, but would still stress that, in the case of banned riders, they have been caught breaking the law in some way or they wouldn't be banned!

You didn't mention why your bike is not taxed Dusty - bit personal I know but it's a boring day at work today - is it just lack of funds/time or do you also currently not have MOT/insurance as well? (just seeing if I can prove my point! Wink go on, shoot me down.....)
____________________
Sod falling in love, I wanna fall in chocolate. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dusty
King of the Rim



Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:35 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So why have they been banned? Don't tell me - totting up points on speeding offences?

Some banned drivers are dangerous. But people can also get banned for say doing 140mph on an empty motorway. Imo this doesn't necessarily mean they are less skilled than someone who sticks to 70mph, on a motorway. Yes it means they have less respect for the law, but I don't think this gives the police the right to endanger others to catch them. For example if a bike tries to get away through a crowded town center on a saturday afternoon, should the police (closely) pursue them?

I do currently have insurance and an mot (can scan them in if you like Wink ), but haven't got round to getting tax yet, partly due to money and partly to laziness.
____________________
Gallery
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

yambabe
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:57 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fair point(s). And I do agree with you about the endangerment aspect.

Still think that, going back to Ste's original post, it comes down to why you are running though.

If you are banned for whatever reason and you decide to ride anyway, that is your decision to make. If you get spotted you must be prepared to live with the consequences - you took the risk. If you run from the police to get away & save your own neck, IMO it is once again you who is endangering Joe Public, not the plod. Vehicular manslaughter if it goes pear-shaped, anyone?

But no, the police shouldn't close chase in those circumstances. (Do they? I know we've got a couple of ex or serving officers of the law on here somewhere). They should however be waiting on your doorstep when you get home!
____________________
Sod falling in love, I wanna fall in chocolate. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

hustler
Crazy Courier



Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:04 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dusty wrote:

I do currently have insurance and an mot (can scan them in if you like Wink ), but haven't got round to getting tax yet, partly due to money and partly to laziness.


I'm assuming your bike is under a SORN?

The new rules mean that keepers who fail to re-license their vehicle (or declare SORN) will incur an automatic penalty of £80 (reduced to £40 if paid within 28 days).

DVLA will carry out a computer check each month to identify those vehicles without a valid tax disc. Although the new rules mean that it is no longer necessary for the vehicle to be seen on a public road before a penalty is issued current on-road enforcement will still continue.

https://www.dvla.gov.uk/newrules/car_tax.htm
____________________
As I said to that guy with the crutches and full camouflage gear, you can hide but you can't run.


Last edited by hustler on 22:21 - 09 Aug 2004; edited 3 times in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Shade_BW
I'm better than you



Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:17 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

riding without tax invalidates your insurance, so you are not insured.

Riding while banned means you are not insured.

Running from the police is just stupid.

They cannot just turn up at your door, because the bike may well be stolen, they have to try and catch the rider.

If you are banned, untaxed, whatever, then face it like an adult. Don't whinge, cry, or try to make excuses.

Shade
Honest to a fault.
____________________
If you like this post, rate it!
Karma is there for a reason.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:34 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hustler wrote:
I'm assuming your bike is under a SORN?

The new rules mean that keepers who fail to re-license their vehicle (or declare SORN) will incur an automatic penalty of £80 (reduced to £40 if paid within 28 days).

DVLA will carry out a computer check each month to identify those vehicles without a valid tax disc. Although the new rules mean that it is no longer necessary for the vehicle to be seen on a public road before a penalty is issued current on-road enforcement will still continue.

https://www.dvla.gov.uk/newrules/car_tax.htm


Yeah, but it isn't true, government propoganda. I have four bikes (or parts thereof with a V5) that are not taxed or SORNed. They sent me a letter (demanding money) about a couple of them over a year ago which I duly filed in the bin. I have heard nothing since.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:36 - 09 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dusty wrote:
Some banned drivers are dangerous. But people can also get banned for say doing 140mph on an empty motorway.


Some are banned for not paying the CSA.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

PsychoHippy
Jammy Git



Joined: 01 Jul 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:07 - 10 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Some are banned for not paying the CSA.


? Shocked
____________________
I spend all my money on bikes and beer, the rest I simply waste!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Born2bVile
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:17 - 10 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Some are banned for not paying the CSA.


I know I call my bike a bastard sometimes, but I've never had to deal with the CSA over it (although maintenance can be a sod).

Explain please.

Cheers,

Byrnie.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Born2bVile
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:25 - 10 Aug 2004    Post subject: Re: Police pursuits and bikes Reply with quote

[quote="byke95"]I personally think if you're going to run from the police you should be pursued (within obvious safety limits in built up areas). If you then crash and kill yourself, it was your choice, not the fault of the police.

However this instance had a pillion on the back, should the police have backed off thinking this chase will endanger an 'innocent' or should they still chase - after all the pillion deceided to put their life in the hands of the rider (as all pillion do each time they climb on the back of a bike). [quote]

I think the police are screwed on this one. Damned if they chase them, damned if they don't.

Every police chase is different, so it should be left to the officer in pursuit to decide.

And whatever their decision is, somebody will disagree.

'The officer was right to call off the pursuit. It was in the middle of a town centre on a Saturday afternoon'

'Bollocks to that. It was my bike they had nicked and he just let them get away'

Cheers,

Byrnie.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:33 - 10 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Police are right in following you and wanting to stop you if there is the need to, but they should stop chasing you when it starts getting too dangerous. The only problem with if they adopt that policy is all you have to do to stop the police chasing you is ride a little dangerously and they will then stop. So if I was already running from the police, I wouldn't be too bothered about doing something which they view as dangerous if I knew it would stop them from chasing me.

So if they choose to chase then they are going into the risk of the rider crashing and them being blamed, or the rider crashing and causing injuries to others and the police again being blamed by people saying they shouldn't have chased. But it wouldn't really work at all if they just said "If you ride dangerously then we won't chase you" as it's just like a get out of jail free card. Catch 22 really for the police. Thinking Thinking
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:37 - 10 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a quick one:
Quote:
IMO it is once again you who is endangering Joe Public, not the plod

I love some of the police camera action programs, "he's driving so dangerously he's in the other lane with oncoming traffic", then after the nimble sports car zipps in again a line of 7 police cars follow into the other lane, oh no, but that's not dangerous at all.

Ok, maybe the majority of chases involve a less skilled driver, but some you see the driver being followed is obviously significantly more skilled than the police following.


Quote:
riding without tax invalidates your insurance, so you are not insured.

Does it? If you had no MOT and had an accident due to a mechanical problem, then at the least I would expect the insurance company to be claiming back the costs from you. Wasn't aware and don't see the relevance with tax.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:15 - 10 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Born2bVile wrote:
Kickstart wrote:
Some are banned for not paying the CSA.


I know I call my bike a bastard sometimes, but I've never had to deal with the CSA over it (although maintenance can be a sod).


Not sure if it went through, but think it did but they were changing the rules so that if someone refused to pay their maintenance then as punishment they would loose their driving licence.

G wrote:
I love some of the police camera action programs, "he's driving so dangerously he's in the other lane with oncoming traffic", then after the nimble sports car zipps in again a line of 7 police cars follow into the other lane, oh no, but that's not dangerous at all.


I know what you mean. Few years back there was one on bikers on the cat and fiddle, with a load of camera work from vehicles, either an unmarked car or bike. One had a bike right up close to the back of a lorry and I was sitting there thinking that he was going to get pulled up and given a serious rollocking. Then realised that the bike in question was the unmarked police one.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:27 - 10 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
...Wasn't aware and don't see the relevance with tax.

Bike would be deemed not road legal. So no insurance. Same as if you crash with a race can (not for road use) can invalidate your insurance.

Yes, before you say it, insurance companies will do anything to avoid/delay payment, but then why make it so easy for them? Mad
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 21 years, 133 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.32 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 121.21 Kb