Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


No Win - No Fee

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

ws4936
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:31 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: No Win - No Fee Reply with quote

When suing a party for injuries and damages from a RTA (or RTI to be politically correct), what is the best way to go about it?

Are the no win no fee people any good, or whatabout the commercials that claim if you win, you get all of the compensation?

Which is best???

(awaits the "There's only one way to find out"! post)

____________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kris
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:47 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

www.sorrymate.com is who I used. They helped reclaim *all* losses with no fuss.

Thumbs Up
____________________
NSR125RR - ZXR750H1 - ZX9R E1 - GSF600S - GSF600SK3 - VFR400-NC30 - SV1000N - ST1100-R - CBR900RR-R - GSF1200SK5 - GSF600SK1 - VFR1200FA - GSXR1000K2 - ZZR1400 D8F
www.prisonplanet.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ws4936
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:55 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers Kris. Looking now, and thinking of asking them for advice. Did it take long from claim to pay?
____________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kris
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:13 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nope, although it did help that the other party was bang to rights...

If nothing else then call them and see what they say. Karma
____________________
NSR125RR - ZXR750H1 - ZX9R E1 - GSF600S - GSF600SK3 - VFR400-NC30 - SV1000N - ST1100-R - CBR900RR-R - GSF1200SK5 - GSF600SK1 - VFR1200FA - GSXR1000K2 - ZZR1400 D8F
www.prisonplanet.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Acemastr
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:09 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unless the insurance didn't take care of the vehicle... or you broke your leg/had time off work... don't do it...

It's raising all of our insurance premiums!

Of course if it caused you hardship, then go for it

</random rant>
____________________
2017 KTM 350 XC-F - 2014 Yamaha R6 - 2005 Yamaha YZ125
2016 Toyota Tacoma Limited
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ws4936
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:06 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Started the proverbial ball rolling, Kris. Thanks man.
Acemastr, based on your comment, i should pay a higher premium to stop others paying a higher premium, which doesn't make sense.
I didn't break any bones, nor had time off work, and the insurance company dealt with the 'disposal' of the bike, and paid out quite speedily. However, i didn't take any time off work, because I already am on a warning for time off from an earlier accident where i had cracked ribs - i felt under the circumstances i couldn't take time off. I was working everyday after the accident whilst taking 240mg of codeine and 4000mg of paracetamol daily for the whiplash and hematoma i had suffered (which i doubt is a hematoma as apparantly it's only supposed to last 6 weeks, this has been going on for months and still causes me pain). My job somewhat changed at work to accommodate the fact i couldn't carry out my duty, and as for the disposal of the bike, my insurance went from £104 fully comp on a 500, to like £214 for the same make/model. Why shouldn't I pursue this? Because i hadn't broken a bone? meh.
As for suffering hardship, the guy couldn't apologize enough for running into me, he went from parked - to knocking someone who was on the road, down because he didn't indicate, use his mirror, or any form of common sense. His reason for not signaling btw, was because he DID use his mirrors, but didn't see anyone, so he would have felt like a tit for using them when no one can see. That's not what he told the insurance company. He told them that he signaled and mirrored, and at no point was i there, implying i was speeding. I was doing about 4mph because being behind him, i had to stop in the road while he pulled up to 'park'.
His lying has quite simply without a matter of doubt in my mind caused this liability matter to be ongoing. Had he have told the truth to his insurer, i wouldn't have even considered this option. He lied, and i get stiffed for it, why should he fight for his vehicle to have his dent pulled out (he was on third party), and i have to pay higher premiums because he didn't see me?

I think you can put that down as hardship.
____________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Willson
Traffic Copper



Joined: 26 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:16 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately unless there are witnesses then most people tend to lie to avoid getting a blame mark put on their insurance record. They know they shouldn't do it, they know it's against the law, but they don't tend to care.

I forget who posted it on here but a van stopped in the middle of the road and reversed into the rider behind. Tried to claim the rider didn't stop.

The biker won the case, but only because he had video evidence.

Helmet cameras can be useful Wink

HTH

Willson
____________________
Benson: Wouldn't life be easier if we were all turtles?
Me: Pig on bread = The way forward.
Riding: '00 Suzuki SV650S. Previous: '99 Kawasaki ER5 - sold, '02 Suzuki GZ125 Marauder - sold
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ollieholt
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:17 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

White Dalton

They got me quite A lot of cash and didn't take any off me. They all recuperate their costs from the courts not you these days, new legislation a few years back.

Also White Dalton is a motorcycle solicitors firm, they all ride too.
____________________
Laughing < This? Well this is just a day brightner.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ws4936
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:33 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember that Wilson, I've been thinking of mini DV cams for a while, but something more important always comes up.

ollieholt, I've already passed on photos and info to sorrymate. Sorry mate, lol.
____________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:38 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Re: No Win - No Fee Reply with quote

ws4936 wrote:
When suing a party for injuries and damages from a RTA (or RTI to be politically correct), what is the best way to go about it?


If it was an accident there was no one to blame as opposed to an incident where there is.

If you are going to complain about an abbreviation then at least make sure you know what it means. Use of language during a claim can turn your claim from an at fault one to a total win.


Last edited by sickpup on 22:12 - 10 Feb 2011; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ws4936
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:46 - 10 Feb 2011    Post subject: Re: No Win - No Fee Reply with quote

sickpup wrote:
ws4936 wrote:
When suing a party for injuries and damages from a RTA (or RTI to be politically correct), what is the best way to go about it?


If it was an accident there was no one to blame as opposed to an incident where there is.

If you are going to complain about an abbreviation then at least make sure you know what it mens. Use of language during a claim can turn your claim from an at fault one to a total win.


Have some karma, i was agreeing with you in my post.
ws4936 wrote:
(or RTI to be politically correct)


Although RTA's aren't used as a reference anymore alot of people still use that abbreviation, hence me using that abbreviation, then correcting it, for the politically minded.
____________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
outlaw This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 315 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.52 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 76.33 Kb