|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Moo. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moo. World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattWadz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattWadz Trackday Trickster

Joined: 08 Apr 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moo. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moo. World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 19:14 - 11 Jun 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Theoretically, the bike would still run... ish.
The cam timings are close enough to not be such a big difference, 400 timings are basically a bit 'wilder' with a longer duration.
Your main problem would be, compression.
If you have 250 bottom end, and 400 barels, where will the pistons sit in the barel at TDC.
400's longer stroke, will mean it probably has longer con rods, and or a different gudgeon to crown height.
You could have piston skirt fouling crank counter balences at BDC or the piston crown fouling head / valves at TDC or you could simply have piston sitting half an inch from the combustion chamber at TDC giving no compression.
But, if that's all OK.... then you'll simply have a 75cc over bored 250 engine..... possibly need re jetting to suit new displacement, might, on 250 carbs run out of breath at the top end.... other wise, would run like a bored out 250....
Given availability of 250N motors and bits, and cost / effort of rebuilding one.... though, one does have to ask if its worth it.
New pistons will set you back about £70, a Gasket set £20, and a rebore or second hand barel, IF you can get a 400 barel, probably another £50.... then you have to set it up......
When you can buy a taxed, & tested mid 90's CB500 for a few hundred quid.... you have to question the ecconomics of muggering about with a thirty year old commuter, and trying to eek a bit moore oomph out of it....... ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moo. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moo. World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 20:25 - 11 Jun 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
If the stroke is longer then either the head is further from the crankcases or the rod is shorter. However a longer rod would be preferred to go with the longer stroke which suggests the head is quite a bit further from the crankcases (ie barrels quite a bit longer).
You might be able to bore out the 250 barrels to take the 400 pistons, assuming the distance between the gudgeon and piston crown is the same.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moo. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moo. World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 20:54 - 11 Jun 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Difference in stroke is about 9mm, so half of that required as extra height for the stroke. From memory of my 400 many years ago there was enough clearance for 4.5mm extra height.
That said looking at the parts lists the top mounting bracket and the frame are the same between the 250 and 400 (have the same part numbers).
The cod rods do have different part numbers. If the 250 has longer rods to go with its shorter stroke the you might be OK. If the rods are shorter (normally stroke is a multiple of con rod length for a certain engine characteristic - shorter rods tend to be used on more revvy engines) and then the height made up with a different distance from gudgeon pin to piston crown, then using the 400 pistons would give a lower compression.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moo. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moo. World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:13 - 11 Jun 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Many thanks for looking into that Keith
Malc. ____________________ A2 Passed 18/6/10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MickC |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MickC Spanner Monkey

Joined: 27 May 2011 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 08:25 - 12 Jun 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Didn't they originally just put an extra sleeve in the barrels for the 250. i know i had an xs250 one time and that is what they did with them ____________________ XX XXXx
Previous: CG125,XS250 (converted to 400),Z250A, GPZ550, Norton Commando, XS500, 78 Laverda Jota, GPZ1100,Harris bonneville, XV750 (mono shock),TR1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 14 years, 203 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|