Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Compulsory to be a Dayglow Derrick?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:07 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Compulsory to be a Dayglow Derrick? Reply with quote

Ripped from MCN Clicky

Quote:

Riders urged to join high-vis demo

Motorcyclists have been urged to join a protest this Saturday against the threat of compulsory high-visibility vests and other restrictive new rules from Brussels.

The Motorcycle Action Group is staging a demonstration rally in Birmingham against proposed anti-tampering rules to stop riders modifying their bikes across Europe and plans for compulsory day-glow bibs in France and Ireland.

A spokesman for the group said: “Mandatory high-vis vests, an end to riders being allowed to modify their bikes and a host of other horrors being foisted on riders by European politicians will be the subject of a major demonstration.

"MAG is joining other rider organisations across Europe to campaign against proposals that have already seen more than 100,000 riders demonstrate in cities across France."

MAG President Ian Mutch said there was a danger compulsory high-vis could "filter through" from France to other member states through EU harmonisation.

French riders are also facing proposals to outlaw filtering and ban bikes over seven years old from entering cities.

Meanwhile the European Commission is proposing measures to prevent engine and drive train modifications on bikes throughout Europe, at the same time as mandating ABS.

Mutch said, "We’re facing an anti-motorcycling onslaught from politicians in different parts of Europe. We need to show our own politicians that riders do not want to see further interference spread to the UK."

Protestors plan to gather at midday in the Hare and Hounds car park, Lickey Road, Rednall, B45 8UU.


WTF!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dazbo666
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:44 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

All I can say is that MCN tend to be very sensationalist with their stories and headlines. Rolling Eyes
I've long since stopped reading it...
____________________
1st bike (Sept'06 - May'10) : 1991 GPZ500S / Current bike (since Nov 2009) : 2003 Suzuki Bandit 600N
Word of the day : DILLIGAF
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ThoughtContro...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:07 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Police https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=222795 Police

That MCN article is crap. It's got no date on it.

Also it was yesterday according to Rogerborg's post, so too late anyway.

There's not alot you can do about it in the UK. If it becomes a European directive then you are screwed, because you're just another EU region so lap that shit up like good little puppies, because whatever they dictate, that's what you'll be doing. Whether that's mod 1's and swerve tests at 50kph, tighter emissions regulations, licence restrictions or whatever. Just like with everything else.

If you don't like it then move to a free country outside the EU, like maybe Libya, where Mr Q is giving out free AK47s to fight the forces of EU tyranny Razz

Expect this crap to come in incrementally. First it'll be the DSA implementing no test unless wearing a high viz. Then it'll be anyone on L plates must wear a high viz. Expect Teflon Mike to join in the cheering on that one, as they're a hazard on the road, it's a privilege to be allowed to wear one until they've done their test etc Razz

Then it'll probably go full blown.

If you don't like it go hassle your Euro-MP, tho expect him to be on a holiday, err I meet fact finding mission to an exclusive resort somewhere.
____________________
Prize cunt
--
"In a world of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:12 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, Google News finds nothing for the demo, which means that it effectively didn't happen. Sad

ThoughtControl wrote:
Expect this crap to come in incrementally. First it'll be the DSA implementing no test unless wearing a high viz. Then it'll be anyone on L plates must wear a high viz.


I agree that it's only a matter of time.

Presumably you know that while doing DAS training you already must wear fluorescent (or reflective at night) clothing, and you're just talking about extending that to while on-test as well? It wouldn't surprise me if there are DSA examiners who haven't read the statute and think hi-vis is already required while on test.

It actually seems to make more sense to require it for unaccompanied 125 L riding, since smaller bikes are (relatively) more likely to be involved in multiple vehicle accidents that might be prevented by being more visible. I just can't quite see why it's only required while on a bigger bike and riding under instruction Question


The Birmingham demo was a bit far for me to shlep, but I do agree that hi-vis should not be mandatory, even though I choose to wear it myself. There is an argument to be made against it. I don't happen to agree with it, and suspect that it's making the evidence fit the desired conclusion, but there is some reasonable doubt.

[UPDATE]

Found this on Another Forum.

Other Forumites wrote:
Badly organised, no signs, only seen 1 marshall [...]
Was badly organised,took all bikes straight thru busy high streets egbaston i think, all foreign to me, bloody chaos, i asked one guy who was marshalling traffic, where the meet up rally was, said there wasnt one crazy they was just going to ride thru town then return to pub, waste of petrol and effort, i lost the others, and gave up after about 45 minutes, and headed for home[...]
There was a meet up at the end of the rally, I found it.
The organisers oppologised for the fuck up, & said they will hold an enquiry into what happened.
The daft thing was they never posted up where the ride out was supposed to finish at, when I suggested they should have put the final meet up on the original link, they thought that was a wonderfull idea.
If the MAG guys are our last line of defence in Europe We are all doomed[...]
The most disappointing thing was that MAG lost the opportunity to ram home the message about the EU tomfuckery.


Doh! Doh! Doh! Doh! Doh! Doh! Doh! Doh! Doh!

Some pictures

An actually effective demonstration:

https://farm6.static.flickr.com/5112/5895282702_471f5c7f7d.jpg
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike


Last edited by Rogerborg on 10:29 - 03 Jul 2011; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ThoughtContro...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:23 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would argue that the problem with small bikes is not that they don't see you, mine has it's lights permanently on, it's that they consider you an insignificant little turd, little more than a cyclist, that they can mow down or bully about at will, and there is nothing you can do about it.

I'd argue that 125 riders should be able to carry an automatic pistol to shoot offending car and van drivers in the head, thus eliminating any future problem. Just a modest proposal Razz Wink
____________________
Prize cunt
--
"In a world of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kramdra
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:52 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

The thing that concerns me far more is the ban on old bikes. Why is this not at the top of the list!?!?????????????


I hear they are planning similar in france for cars. Id like to see it on HGV's first!



You are expected, when with a riding school (DAS or not!), to wear their hi-vis vests. Its advertising for them also. If you dont want it, dont use a riding school.

I will not be wearing one for my DAS test, and I wont be having DAS instruction (because of cost!)



ABS and OBD is a *GOOD* thing. We want this. Why has it taken so long to reach bikes?
It would remove chinese brands from the map for a start. I would be quite happy with a ban on drum brakes on new bikes, also.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy_Pagin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:28 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you're going to hold a demo like this it needs to be held in central London, professionally organised, well publicized and ideally end up with a sane articulate spokesperson handing a huge petition to the transport minister in front of the worlds' media. Making a minor nuisance of yourself in Brum is a waste of time.
____________________
They're coming to take me away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa, hey-hey,
the men in white coats are coming to take me away.
Yamaha Vity -> YBR125 -> FZS600 Fazer -> FZ1-S Fazer
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

rac3r
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:29 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stuff the Hi Viz it's the bit about not being allowed to modify your bike!!!

So that means no sprocket changes, no exhausts, no aftermarket filters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Surely this will just destroy the aftermarket industry?
____________________
Bikes : 2006 CBR125R - 2004 Monster 620ie - 2004 ZX-6R B1H - 2005 Monster S2R 800 - 2011 Street Triple - 2009 Streetfighter 1098 - 2014 ZX-6R 636

Chequered Flag
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:10 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

kramdra wrote:
The thing that concerns me far more is the ban on old bikes. Why is this not at the top of the list!?!?????????????


Because at the moment it's purely a Froggish notion. However, that London is always on the look out for ways to shaft motorists of all stripes, so it's worth keeping an eye on.

kramdra wrote:
ABS and OBD is a *GOOD* thing. We want this. Why has it taken so long to reach bikes?


We want it, but we (as a whole) don't want to pay for it. Bike sales have been in the toilet for the last 3 years, the last thing manufacturers and dealers need is another set of regulations that'll make all bikes more expensive.


kramdra wrote:
It would remove chinese brands from the map for a start. I would be quite happy with a ban on drum brakes on new bikes, also.


125s will be able to have linked brakes rather than ABS. Do you know a lot of 125s that have ABS just now?

Since the majority of new 125s are now built in China (or India or Korea), then it's hardly going to be a problem for Chinese-branded cloners to produce linked-brake 125s, or ABS enabled bigger bikes for that matter. It's not like it's bleeding edge technology, and they don't even have to spend money on R&D - the Japanese will do that for them.


rac3r wrote:
Stuff the Hi Viz it's the bit about not being allowed to modify your bike!!!

So that means no sprocket changes, no exhausts, no aftermarket filters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Surely this will just destroy the aftermarket industry?


As I understand it, the directive being mooted will cover manufacture and sale, not what happens afterwards.

Of course, if we get... a certain type of government... back in again, they'll cream themselves coming up with ways to over-interpret the directive and criminalise even thinking about modifying a bike.

In any case, your first port of call is your MEP. [UPDATE] or any UK MEP on the Transport committee.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike


Last edited by Rogerborg on 13:36 - 03 Jul 2011; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Cheeseybeaner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:23 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

You want compulsory ABS or linked braking on all bikes?! Why?
Can't think of anything worse that would take away the factor of rider skill from motorcycling.
As to banning drum brakes! What planet are you on that that should be an issue?? Bizarre.
As to hi viz how do you define what's acceptable? Buy a hi viz vest and it gets so dirty after a weeks riding it can be far from hi viz anyway. A load of unworkable bollocks I think.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy_Pagin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:52 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think linked brakes could be lethal, being able to intuatively balance braking according to road and weather conditions is critical.

As for abs, I once relied on it in an emergency stop in my Ford Explorer and rear ended a car. If I'd been driving my 1967 Landrover I'd have swerved around instead. That rapid juddering when abs kicks in has a horrible mind freezing psychological effect.
____________________
They're coming to take me away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa, hey-hey,
the men in white coats are coming to take me away.
Yamaha Vity -> YBR125 -> FZS600 Fazer -> FZ1-S Fazer
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Bendy
Mrs Sensible



Joined: 10 Jun 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:15 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andy_Pagin wrote:
If you're going to hold a demo like this it needs to be held in central London, professionally organised, well publicized and ideally end up with a sane articulate spokesperson handing a huge petition to the transport minister in front of the worlds' media. Making a minor nuisance of yourself in Brum is a waste of time.


Not sure anyone would care, thanks to the Westminster parking lot pissing off Londoners for so long. It's just be another annoyance by 'that bike lot' to most people.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Cheeseybeaner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:04 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bendy wrote:
Andy_Pagin wrote:
If you're going to hold a demo like this it needs to be held in central London, professionally organised, well publicized and ideally end up with a sane articulate spokesperson handing a huge petition to the transport minister in front of the worlds' media. Making a minor nuisance of yourself in Brum is a waste of time.


Not sure anyone would care, thanks to the Westminster parking lot pissing off Londoners for so long. It's just be another annoyance by 'that bike lot' to most people.


To be fair I think many Londoners support the No To Bike Parking Tax campaign as it affects them directly.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MinhDinh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:09 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

We should do it French style and burn some shit up.
____________________
Hit the G spot. Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:10 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

rac3r wrote:
Stuff the Hi Viz it's the bit about not being allowed to modify your bike!!!

So that means no sprocket changes, no exhausts, no aftermarket filters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Surely this will just destroy the aftermarket industry?


That one has regularly cropped up. Its following precedents set by German TUV approval, and they have kept chucking it in the proposals to piss us of to MY knowledge since 1986.....

Furthest they got it was the mandatory BSI standard marking of exhaust silencers, which lasted uneffectively less than ten years, until EU 'Harmonisation' ripped the standards to shreds, and dumped us back with 'Unreasonably Noisy'!

MCN like sensationalist stories..... when they dont have one, they make one, and if they can drag up something from the anals that hasn't properly 'gone away' they will.

The compulsary Hi Vis and compulsary daylight running lamps has been knocking about variousely since the early 90's too......

Thing is, far too many bikers, 'get in' to biking, and last perhaps five years are keen regular riders before interest wains or enthusiasm gets directed elsewhere.... so far too much of this shit gets 're-invented' time and time again.

If you are worried; join MAG and or BMF, pay your dues to the campaign funds, and LET THEM GET ON WITH IT!

Like they have been doing for in MAG's case forty frigging years!
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

blurredman
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:45 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not the one driving 30mph then slowing just a yard before a give way!

ABS, Airbags, more lethal then not.
____________________
CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Lone-Wolf
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:50 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

kramdra wrote:
I would be quite happy with a ban on drum brakes on new bikes, also.


Wotcha.

Never heard of Grimeca brakes then ?
____________________
Cheers.
^..^
L.W. - www.moonshiners.org.uk
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Cheeseybeaner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:44 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lone-Wolf wrote:
kramdra wrote:
I would be quite happy with a ban on drum brakes on new bikes, also.


Wotcha.

Never heard of Grimeca brakes then ?


Nothing wrong with a good drum brake. I'd prefer one on the back depending on the bike personally, less hassle than maintaining a disc brake.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy_Pagin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:02 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

ThoughtControl wrote:

I'd argue that 125 riders should be able to carry an automatic pistol to shoot offending car and van drivers in the head, thus eliminating any future problem. Just a modest proposal Razz Wink


That's one of the most stupid irresponsible comments I have ever read. ALWAYS aim two shots in the chest, have you any idea how difficult a head shot is? Also a double action revolver is a better choice than a semi auto in my experience, I recommend a smith and wesson model 686, preferably with pachmyer grips. Wink
____________________
They're coming to take me away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa, hey-hey,
the men in white coats are coming to take me away.
Yamaha Vity -> YBR125 -> FZS600 Fazer -> FZ1-S Fazer
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bazza
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:47 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheeseybeaner wrote:
To be fair I think many Londoners support the No To Bike Parking Tax campaign as it affects them directly.


To be fair, you're talking bollocks. Your campaign has imploded into in-fighting and name-calling, your chairman has run away, you've pissed off far more people than the few you claim support you and alienated bikers from the public thanks to your selfish antics. You lot are a joke - and not a very funny one.
____________________
"That's it. You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college."
'98 Ducati 750SS, '08 Suzuki GSX650F ©2004-2014, Bazza's Harmless Banter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MinhDinh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:59 - 03 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am against being forced to wear a Hi vis, but I also think it probably saves lives.
____________________
Hit the G spot. Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kal9001
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:52 - 04 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I cant help but to think that a ban on old bikes is just to drive the market for people to buy new ones. I would guess that statistically someone who has ridden the same bike for 20 years and never crashed it is far less likely to crash than the guy who drove different cars for 20 years and just bought a brand new fireblade.

Assuming theres no ABS in what way is a new 1000cc Fireblade "safer" than the old 900cc Fireblade that may be 10 years old by now?
Will this spill out into cars as well if this gets through will cars older than 7 years be banned. I would say that this situation would in fact detract from road safety as it would limit public investment...e.g.

At the moment you may go and pay a premium to buy a brand new Toyota with all the modern crash protection stuff. Knowing that when your done with it in 7 years you have a resale value to buy your new car.
If we live in a world where 'old' cars are banned you cant buy this very safe car anymore because you know that you cant resell it after 7 years, it has to be crushed, So what do you do...You buy the cheapest piece of shit you can find that you dont care if its worth bugger all in 7 years because it wouldnt be anyway! So instead of safe expensive cars everywhere you get cheap shit everywhere and people dying more from smaller accidents!

I think I heard not too long ago that this is or has already happened with Taxis in the UK.

As for the high vis thing. It would be very annoying. Why not force all cars to have a reflective paint jobs and lights that stay on all the time, if there making bikes do this then why should cars be made to do this!?
____________________
Anyone stupid enough to think we will drag a load of wooden horses full of soldiers into our city is certanley stupid enough to drag all of ours into theirs!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Cheeseybeaner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:13 - 04 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

bazza wrote:


To be fair, you're talking bollocks. Your campaign has imploded into in-fighting and name-calling, your chairman has run away, you've pissed off far more people than the few you claim support you and alienated bikers from the public thanks to your selfish antics. You lot are a joke - and not a very funny one.


I've always found them very supportive.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Jim Mc
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:36 - 04 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

bazza wrote:
Cheeseybeaner wrote:
To be fair I think many Londoners support the No To Bike Parking Tax campaign as it affects them directly.


To be fair, you're talking bollocks. Your campaign has imploded into in-fighting and name-calling, your chairman has run away, you've pissed off far more people than the few you claim support you and alienated bikers from the public thanks to your selfish antics. You lot are a joke - and not a very funny one.


That's exactly the impression I got after watching a few of their videos on Youtube.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:56 - 04 Jul 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, this again?

NTBPT = good cause[1], questionable tactics. But by Jove they had a good go.

The "antics" got two legal challenges funded, but the legal teams (IMO) then ballsed them both up a treat. Ah well.

However, the Trafalgar Square protest was primarily a marketing ploy and a fund-raiser - it was never going to blackmail WCC into caving in. Why would they care? It seems completely counter-productive now, and even reduced to monthly I can't see the point.

However, the No To Mob (Judean People's Front) offshoot looks like a hoot. Assisting scamera cars to become the "visible deterrent" that they claim to be? What's not to like about that?

I know they're different campaigns now, but NTM did come from NTBPT (People's Front of Judea), so credit where credit is due.

Now... if anyone still cares, unleash the Nobcat.

[1] Motorcycles are a solution to urban congestion - ask the Chinese. Or Top Gear, who do their urban filming from bikes.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 353 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.18 Sec - Server Load: 0.86 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 146.95 Kb