Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


New four stroke engine.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Found on the 'Net
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

sidewinder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:40 - 09 Sep 2011    Post subject: New four stroke engine. Reply with quote

https://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2kxLnu/www.new4stroke.com/t:4e6a95258a770;src:all

Enjoy Very Happy pretty interesting reading
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:00 - 09 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Added complexity for what benefit? Also combustion area shape doesn't look too efficient.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

hmmmnz
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:15 - 10 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

very similar to the bear head, but using pistons instead of sliding ports,
as for complexity its no more complex than 4 valves a cam and rocker arms,
less complex if anything
____________________
the humans are dead
I kick arse for the lord
Wiring Diagrams BIDNIP it bitches
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:59 - 10 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
This new concept eliminates the most complicated mechanism in the combustion engine: the head and valve train.
The idea is to replace the camshaft with a crankshaft and replace the valves with pistons. By doing this, the inventor, Andrew Feliks, created a new and very simple four stroke engine.

In this invention the piston with compressions rings slides in a cylinder which has a side port. A pair of these pistons and cylinders replaces the intake and exhaust valve.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:01 - 10 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frost wrote:
Also combustion area shape doesn't look too efficient.


+1

No way that is going to be as efficient as modern common rail diesels.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:32 - 10 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmmmnz wrote:
very similar to the bear head, but using pistons instead of sliding ports,
as for complexity its no more complex than 4 valves a cam and rocker arms,
less complex if anything


Instead of all that you now have twice as many cranks, 3 times as many big end bearings, 3 times as many piston rings potentially giving 3 times the oil loss with 3 times as many cylinders that can become oval.
Surely it only acheives the same ting as a split single but with aditional complexity?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

hmmmnz
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:29 - 12 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

i didnt say it was a good idea, but its relitivly simple,
not as simple as the bear head though
____________________
the humans are dead
I kick arse for the lord
Wiring Diagrams BIDNIP it bitches
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sniff6
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:53 - 12 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmmmnz wrote:
i didnt say it was a good idea, but its relitivly simple,
not as simple as the bear head though


Is this the Beare Head??? A six stroke engine!!!

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/38/M4%2B2anim.gif/300px-M4%2B2anim.gif

I'd never heard of it TBO
____________________
'Great Britain' Love it https://img43.imageshack.us/img43/3967/67004290.gif or Leave it
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chrisw
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:01 - 12 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

sniff6 wrote:

Is this the Beare Head??? A six stroke engine!!!


That looks just as inefficient as the one above. If you watch the rotation of the main crank, just at the point it will be creating peak torque, the smaller (right-hand) piston is moving away, increasing the volume of the combustion chamber. Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:27 - 13 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

chrisw wrote:
sniff6 wrote:

Is this the Beare Head??? A six stroke engine!!!


That looks just as inefficient as the one above. If you watch the rotation of the main crank, just at the point it will be creating peak torque, the smaller (right-hand) piston is moving away, increasing the volume of the combustion chamber. Confused


Yeh, massive fail there. Unless the cranks are linked (obviously through some reduction gear).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

sniff6
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:41 - 13 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Found this..The guy himself to explain it to you.https://www.ftn2day.nl/images/icon_eek.gif

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PW5Y7v00Xo
____________________
'Great Britain' Love it https://img43.imageshack.us/img43/3967/67004290.gif or Leave it
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chrisw
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:58 - 13 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

It explains how it works but focuses on energy required to open the valves. That's just one part of how efficient an engine is. How about the 'blow-past' of the additional cylinder, additional weight and rotational masses and as mentioned the changing size/shape of the combustion chamber.
And with bikes, that design makes the engine taller, adding mass high up in the frame exactly where you don't want it.

Great idea, but flawed. I'd like to see one put on a dyno and compared to a 'traditional' design. It just doesn't add up to me but I'd be happy to be wrong!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

sniff6
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:12 - 13 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

chrisw wrote:
It explains how it works but focuses on energy required to open the valves. That's just one part of how efficient an engine is. How about the 'blow-past' of the additional cylinder, additional weight and rotational masses and as mentioned the changing size/shape of the combustion chamber.
And with bikes, that design makes the engine taller, adding mass high up in the frame exactly where you don't want it.

Great idea, but flawed. I'd like to see one put on a dyno and compared to a 'traditional' design. It just doesn't add up to me but I'd be happy to be wrong!


UUUmmm... Your right of course,How about the Grail engine??? They have devloped a new 2 stroke engine that is enviromentally friendly, can run on almost any fuel, and weighs next to nothing. I belive the 100hp motor has 1 cylinder, and weighs less than 75 lbs....imagine the possibilities.

One Litre Engine Projections based upon vehicle weight and engine demand:

* 100+ MPG’s
* 180 ft lbs Torque
* 200 Horse Power

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZxrumC_DYU&feature=player_embedded
____________________
'Great Britain' Love it https://img43.imageshack.us/img43/3967/67004290.gif or Leave it
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

hmmmnz
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:37 - 14 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

sniff6 wrote:
hmmmnz wrote:
i didnt say it was a good idea, but its relitivly simple,
not as simple as the bear head though


Is this the Beare Head??? A six stroke engine!!!

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/38/M4%2B2anim.gif/300px-M4%2B2anim.gif

I'd never heard of it TBO

no its not,
the bearehead motor was a simple overhead motor that has the valve train replaced with a single sliding port operated via the original cam chain/belt, he had it running on a ducati and a dr650, it had a load more torque than standard, on a vid i saw of the dr650, the had it against a wall, and dropped the clutch at idle it would just sit there and wheel spin,

unfortuanatly someone managed to buy the patents from mr beare and shut down his site etc etc and that was the end of that,
____________________
the humans are dead
I kick arse for the lord
Wiring Diagrams BIDNIP it bitches
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 152 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Found on the 'Net All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.07 Sec - Server Load: 1.12 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 85.2 Kb