|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Redoko |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Redoko World Chat Champion

Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 17:44 - 24 Sep 2011 Post subject: DSLR. |
 |
|
Looking at upgrading my old point and shoot soon.
Done a bit of looking around the web after a mate whos keen on his photography (as in his cameras worth half my bike keen )
He recommended me the Sony A290 for a starter or 'entry level' DLSR.
Does anyone have this camera?
Opinions etc?
Or even other models, budget £-300 ____________________ "Let's face it, this is not the worst thing you've caught me doing."
Sudika Sportsman SK50QT > Gilera DNA50 > Honda CBR125 RW7 > Kawasaki Zephyr750 > Suzuki GSXR600 > Honda Hornet CB600F '51 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| st3v3 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 st3v3 Super Spammer

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:28 - 24 Sep 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Now this, this should be in Geek Zone, yet mine's moved from Random Bantor when it wasn't technical.
Cool eh?
My dad very recently got a canon one, it's pretty special. Il ask him what model it is, he spent 5 months waiting for a good deal on it. ____________________ Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Redoko |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Redoko World Chat Champion

Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ..... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ..... Quote Me Happy
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:41 - 24 Sep 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Having recently dipped my toe into the DSLR world myself, I understand your predicament.
In the end, after reading countless reviews, I just thought "Well, they're all going to be good just pick one". I went for the Canon 1000D in the end and I'm happy enough with it. There camera is better than I am at the moment. I assume cameras are like bikes in the way that the user will rarely use it to 100% of its capability.
For me with hindsight, and it's funnily enough what people told me, it's about the lenses you're going to use and their price etc that's equally important.
Think about what you want to take photos of and how much suitable lenses are.
Again, like bikes, a pro could do things that you couldn't come close to with the same kit.
Anyway, there's lots of people on here who know far, far more than me so wait for their advice  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Codemonkey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Codemonkey Crazy Courier

Joined: 18 Oct 2009 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Redoko |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Redoko World Chat Champion

Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:55 - 24 Sep 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Joe wrote: | Having recently dipped my toe into the DSLR world myself, I understand your predicament.
In the end, after reading countless reviews, I just thought "Well, they're all going to be good just pick one". I went for the Canon 1000D in the end and I'm happy enough with it. There camera is better than I am at the moment. I assume cameras are like bikes in the way that the user will rarely use it to 100% of its capability.
For me with hindsight, and it's funnily enough what people told me, it's about the lenses you're going to use and their price etc that's equally important.
Think about what you want to take photos of and how much suitable lenses are.
Again, like bikes, a pro could do things that you couldn't come close to with the same kit.
Anyway, there's lots of people on here who know far, far more than me so wait for their advice  |
Well after trawling the internet. I pretty much came the same result you have.
There are riders that could have me round a track on a 125 when I'm on my Hornet easy.
This is apparently what I'm looking for in a DSLR.
For macro shots and sport/action.
Image stabilization
Low noise at high ISO settings
Image noise reduction for slow shutter speeds
Remote shutter release
High continuous speed
Large buffer
Fast multi-point autofocus
But with a such low budget compared to the higher end cameras I don't settling with the A290 as apparently it's only draw back is lack of features where as it excels in quality and value for money, which ultimately, getting into the photography fun properly at this level is best. ____________________ "Let's face it, this is not the worst thing you've caught me doing."
Sudika Sportsman SK50QT > Gilera DNA50 > Honda CBR125 RW7 > Kawasaki Zephyr750 > Suzuki GSXR600 > Honda Hornet CB600F '51 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 22:17 - 24 Sep 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
I would say it depends on how many lenses you will need, and also whether you have / have access to other lenses.
Both Canon and Nikon have a good range of lenses, with plenty available 2nd hand and also a good range of 3rd party lenses. Sony less so. Pentax and Olympus even less so (and while Pentax have a fair range of shorter lenses, they have virtually no longer lenses).
I wouldn't worry about image stabilisation much.
Low noise at high ISO is a nice to have. But to be honest for any normal shooting I rarely use less than ISO 400, so what it is like at ISO 12800 is pretty irrelevant.
Noise reduction is a mixed blessing. You can likely do a good job using Photoshop instead, and the delay between taking a picture and it being saved can be VERY long with the noise reduction turned on Ie, on my Canon cameras it uses a second shot with the shutter closed, and uses the result of that to help sort out the proper shot, hence it takes just as long to save as the original shot too to shoot. Bit of a pain with a 30 second exposure.
Remote shutter release would be something I would expect to have.
You last 3 points are a bit of a wish list. Any consumer body you buy will be outperformed on these by the pro bodies. How much do you want to spend (a Canon 1D Mk4 is £3577). Also, for sports use (bike on track) most of the time I just use the centre a/f point.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 15:52 - 25 Sep 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
| st3v3 wrote: | Now this, this should be in Geek Zone, yet mine's moved from Random Bantor when it wasn't technical.
|
If you'd put it in here, it'd have stayed as it's asking a question (which should be done in this section.)
As it was a question a geek would be most likely to answer, I put it in there.
I normally move camera stuff to there from Random banter too.
For camera choice - do consider your upgrade path.
This is unfortunately partly why Canon and Nikon have such a monopoly, because they have such a monopoly.
I went for canon both because I had a canon EOS camera in 95 (and used various people on here's), and because I know that not only is there a wide range of lens and accessories for it easily available, but that there's a wide range of cameras they will work on.
I found the acceptable high ISO/low light stuff useful at Glastonbury etc.
The first is from a Panasonic LX3 (prosumer compact camera - nice and portable, but relatively small sensor) while the second is (a cropped shot) from a Canon 60d.
https://gees.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p170464006-4.jpg
https://gees.zenfolio.com/img/v21/p589755524-4.jpg
Both at ISO 3200.
60d at 6400:
https://gees.zenfolio.com/img/v23/p296269736-4.jpg
60d at 12800:
https://gees.zenfolio.com/img/v21/p598083946-4.jpg
As with bikes, a more expensive camera does mean the amateur can do more with less skill, while the profession requires the ease for business.
Incidentally, believe the next model down canon comes with the same sensor, but don't think it makes it to the entry level.
While I'd like some of the benefits of a full frame sensor, overall I was pleased with my choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| st3v3 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 st3v3 Super Spammer

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| _Troy_ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 _Troy_ World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Feb 2011 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 12:35 - 26 Sep 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Being a photographer and a writer for a beginner photography magazine, i feel i can give some advice here.
Stick with Canon or Nikon. They have such a huge following compared to Sony, meaning there are more second hand accessories and lenses available, as well as useful forums and info.
Don't neglect second hand, as there are so many bargains to be had. Get a decent D60 or even D3000 for your budget and you may have money left for another lens.
Nikon wins quite easily at high ISO usage, and they also have better build quality in their entry level cameras. But Canon cameras can be good, but just don't seem to be up to the same quality these days.
Sorry i can't be more help - kind of busy. Feel free to PM me with more specific camera questions. It is my job afterall  ____________________ Current bike: ZX6R J1
Previous bikes: CLR 125 | GS500 | ZX6R G2 | SV650 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 14 years, 101 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|