Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Car thread - How bad are Alfa Romeos these days?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

garth
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:56 - 06 Dec 2011    Post subject: Car thread - How bad are Alfa Romeos these days? Reply with quote

In particular 2003 ish 147 JTD Diesels.

Anyone had any experience?
____________________
You ain't a has been if you never was
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:07 - 06 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

No experience with the diesels, but happy with the petrol ones. The 156 we have is certainly better built than the Jaguar X Type we have.

What a 147 will use (and a 156 or a GT) is the upper suspension arms. They are fairly cheap and easy to replace but expect to replace them every 30k.

We have had our 156 since 102k and it is now on 147k. Non service bits it has needed are a MAF sensor, several side light bulbs, the resistor unit on the radiator for the fan, battery, a heater servo motor, set of brake disks, front brake hoses, a rear caliper, rear window winder mechanism and the upper suspension arms. Power steering pipes also got damaged on a speed hump. None of these things have been that expensive nor most difficult to change (power steering pipes were a pain though).

Also replaced the cam belts and the clutch (belts as a service item, clutch probably didn't need doing but at least means we can forget about it now)

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

groovylee
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:48 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alfas are only as good or bad as the person that owns them. keep on top of the required maintenance, and they will do fine.

just one thing to note, the cambelt changes on the twinspark petrol engines are 36K or 3 years, whichever is the soonest. DO NOT let anyone tell you otherwise, it will end up costing you.

for more info, you could try www.alfaowner.com (i used to be the south east regional rep on there, good bunch really)
apologies for the link, if i shouldn't post it please remove, but they really are one of the best sources of info for all alfa stuff.

hope it helps
____________________
Past - 1988 honda revere 600, 1996 kawasaki gpz500s, 1999 Yamaha R6

Current - 2002 Aprilia RSV1000R & 1999 Kawasaki ZX6R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:38 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

groovylee wrote:
Most vehicles are only as good or bad as the person that owns them. keep on top of the required maintenance, and they will do fine.
Edited for Accuracy.

groovylee wrote:
just one thing to note, the cambelt changes on the twinspark petrol engines are 36K or 3 years, whichever is the soonest. DO NOT let anyone tell you otherwise, it will end up costing you.
See, this annoys me.

You say "36K or 3 years, whichever soonist"... how does that work?!
Surely it's JUST a distance thing with wear and tear, because if a car is sat stored with 12K on the clock for 7 years according to your comment it would need a cambelt change twice while storage depsite not moving a millimetre.

More realistically, let's say it's just driven round town doing 11K miles a year. that means in 3 years it does 33K, so if there's still a quota'd 3K left why does it need doing at the 3 year mark; not 3 years and 4 months?
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

defblade
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:54 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twin sparks can have a ....minor.... problem with cylinder #3 if the previous tightfisted pikey bastard owners used cheap oil:

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v471/defblade/conrod.jpg

But I can't say about diesel engines as I've now had an Alfa and don't feel the urge again Wink

In the meantime, my 156 had had a LOT of welding to the floor and the suspension, while nice and accurate, was too soft for pushing on. And the electrics were buggy. But I did like it... until the engine went Very Happy
____________________
Honda Varadero 125cc => Suzuki Bandit 650 33bhp => 77bhp =>
BMW K1200R Sport 163bhp Twisted Evil => Aprilia Shiver GT 750 95bhp
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:11 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

My father in law to be has a 2003ish 147 with the 1.6 petrol engine. He loves it, great car to drive.

However, it has had the following problems:

Cam belt went at 40k/4 years. Needed a replacement engine, Alfa didn't pay for any of it.

Variator wasn't replaced at the last cambelt change, so it sounds like a diesel when warming up.

3 of the 4 door bottoms are very rusty, a screwdriver would punch through them.

Poor fuel burn - mostly used around town, achieves about 25 to the gallon. Driven in a fairly Italian manner though.

He wishes he had gone for the 2 litre, it is quite a heavy car and you don't save anything from having the 1.6, the fuel burn is the same as you would expect from the 2.0.

Would be quite a good buy now, seeing as they don't cost a great deal and will do a few years service before becoming terminal. Don't buy a scabby one and pour loads of money into making it perfect though, money down the drain. Show it too much love and it'll reward you by breaking.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

garth
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:39 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is what I'm considering.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/250945202106?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
____________________
You ain't a has been if you never was
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:27 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

st3v3 wrote:

You say "36K or 3 years, whichever soonist"... how does that work?!
Surely it's JUST a distance thing with wear and tear, because if a car is sat stored with 12K on the clock for 7 years according to your comment it would need a cambelt change twice while storage depsite not moving a millimetre.


Belts degrade with age and exposure to oils, etc. And sat still without moving they tend to get a natural bend where they go round pullies.

I wouldn't worry too much about the 3 years like that if not used, but would be more inclined if that were 3 years of doing 5k rather than 12k.

Alfa used to specify 72k for the cam belt change interval on the TS engines but changed that the 36k.

defblade wrote:
Twin sparks can have a ....minor.... problem with cylinder #3 if the previous tightfisted pikey bastard owners used cheap oil:


Shouldn't be from the oil used, rather people not keeping the oil topped up. They have a fairly small sump and when they get to 80k or so with typical use the oil consumption can get enough that they will need topping up between services. Fail to top it up and the oil level drops enough to lose oil pressure (maybe when cornering hard). If the previous owner was dodgy they then quickly top it up and sell it on so when the crank goes a few thousand miles later it is someone elses bill.

Robby wrote:
Poor fuel burn - mostly used around town, achieves about 25 to the gallon. Driven in a fairly Italian manner though.

He wishes he had gone for the 2 litre, it is quite a heavy car and you don't save anything from having the 1.6, the fuel burn is the same as you would expect from the 2.0..


They should be way better than that and the 1.6 should be noticeably better on fuel than the 2L (friend who worked for an Alfa specialist went for a 1.6 because of how much better on fuel they were than the 2L engines - and he had plenty of them to play with).

What does kill the fuel consumption is a dead thermostat. The ones on the TS engines seem to fail almost always open so the car doesn't overheat but runs cold, and when cold they run richer and drink petrol.

Garth - doesn't mention the upper arms being replaced although just claims they are all OK. I would budget on new ones at some point fairly soon, but they are only about £50 each for OE ones and fairly easy to change (if all goes well about half an hour each on the drive, although budget on some ARB drop links as well so if they are a pain you don't care about wrecking them).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:16 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't give much insight, but had a 2008 Spider JTDM 2.4 hire car with 18000 miles on it.

After a week it decided to lose oil pressure and I watched the oil level plummet and car went into limp mode and broke down.

Before that, was fantastic. It has put me off one but I heard it was just a sensor that went faulty and the ECU decided to cut it to 30mph Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kwaks
I'm not a fast rider



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:02 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

had a 147 selespeed, 2L petrol. Loved that car but had a few problems with the selespeed so got rid. Engine and bodywork were spot on though
____________________
Fallen Angel "Nae sniffing my seat now!!!!! "
www.cliqueycuntsmcc.co.uk
I AM NOT A FAST RIDER!!!!!!!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

defblade
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:57 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

defblade wrote:
Twin sparks can have a ....minor.... problem with cylinder #3 if the previous tightfisted pikey bastard owners used cheap oil:


Shouldn't be from the oil used, rather people not keeping the oil topped up. They have a fairly small sump and when they get to 80k or so with typical use the oil consumption can get enough that they will need topping up between services. Fail to top it up and the oil level drops enough to lose oil pressure (maybe when cornering hard).


The exhaust runs too near big end #3 under the sump.... cheap oil cooks out of the bearing from exhaust heat each time it's parked up (I now know).

No oil pressure light, even on corners, until one day you let off the throttle a little bit and notice the car slows down too much. Oh, you think, I wonder if a brake is binding? Nearly home, I'll check if anything's hot when I get there. Back on the throttle again (slower person in front just moved over out of right hand lane on dual carriageway) and then the oil pressure light comes on... but the BOOM, instant fog bank, loss of power and bits rattling down the bottom of the car told me more Wink There was plenty of oil in it.....
____________________
Honda Varadero 125cc => Suzuki Bandit 650 33bhp => 77bhp =>
BMW K1200R Sport 163bhp Twisted Evil => Aprilia Shiver GT 750 95bhp
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:22 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Not so sure on the exhaust cooking the big end as plenty of oil and metal in the sump to act as a heat sink. Oil light I meant was for the previous owner letting the level get low, damaging the big end but not immediately terminal so they flog the car quick.

One other issue that people suffer on the TS engine is from a bodged repair following a cam belt failure. These are an interference engine so a snapped belt will result in a load of bent valves, but also often it seems to damage the big ends which fail shortly after the valves are sorted.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

andys675
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:43 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

the wife's nephew (ron) has a brera

one of the car buying web sites refused to make him an offer for it

so now our kids sing to him "we buy any car, not ron's!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

defblade
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:10 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Oil light I meant was for the previous owner letting the level get low, damaging the big end but not immediately terminal so they flog the car quick.


Ah, could have been that.....
____________________
Honda Varadero 125cc => Suzuki Bandit 650 33bhp => 77bhp =>
BMW K1200R Sport 163bhp Twisted Evil => Aprilia Shiver GT 750 95bhp
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:33 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

andys350 wrote:
the wife's nephew (ron) has a brera

one of the car buying web sites refused to make him an offer for it

so now our kids sing to him "we buy any car, not ron's!"


As an aside, if it is a 2.2 petrol Brera then the engine is basically a GM engine unit with an Alfa head. It was a joint venture between Fiat and GM, as was the platform. Fair few GM versions of that engine around but I think only the 159 and Brera / Spider used the platform (it was meant to have been used by Saab as well).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

knocker
Nova Slayer



Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:30 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bought my first Alfa, a 156 six months ago and absolutely love it.

The clutch hydraulics have recently started giving me grief and the front suspension creaks a bit now and then but other than that it's been great. Lovely to look at and even better to drive.

It certainly won't be the last alfa I buy.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Shaft
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:44 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:


As an aside, if it is a 2.2 petrol Brera then the engine is basically a GM engine unit with an Alfa head. It was a joint venture between Fiat and GM, as was the platform. Fair few GM versions of that engine around but I think only the 159 and Brera / Spider used the platform (it was meant to have been used by Saab as well).

All the best

Keith


It was used by Saab and that engine is a boat anchor; they suffer from sudden and unexplained timing chain failure, with catastrophic results.

They have also been known to snap the valve slippers, seizing the top end, with the same result.
____________________
Things get better with age; I'm close to being magnificent........
20 RE Interceptor, 83 Z1100A3, 83 GS650 Katana
WooHoo, I'm a Man Point Millionaire! https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=234035
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Oldie
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 05 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:51 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

My 156 was superb - great value for money. Only ever had the one problem and that was with the wipers
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:21 - 08 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shaft wrote:

It was used by Saab and that engine is a boat anchor; they suffer from sudden and unexplained timing chain failure, with catastrophic results.


Sorry, didn't put it very well. The engine was used in plenty of thigs but the platform was meant to be used by Saab as well that seemed to die a death.

In Alfas the engine isn't too bad for reliability. The timing chains do wear out but seem to trigger issues without snapping (engine management detects the cams getting slightly out of phase and lights the dashboard up like a Christmas tree).

Overweight lumps though (car and engine).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Shaft
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:12 - 08 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Shaft wrote:

It was used by Saab and that engine is a boat anchor; they suffer from sudden and unexplained timing chain failure, with catastrophic results.


Sorry, didn't put it very well. The engine was used in plenty of thigs but the platform was meant to be used by Saab as well that seemed to die a death.



IIRC, part of GM's Grand Master Plan was to produce a 'small' Saab, but that coincided with that particular division's downturn in fortunes (no doubt brought on by the distinctly average Vauxhall 9-3) so it never happened.

Shame about Saab, if Top Gear reckon you aren't a true petrolhead until you've owned an Alfa, Saab should be #2 on the list, or would be if GM hadn't buggered them up.
____________________
Things get better with age; I'm close to being magnificent........
20 RE Interceptor, 83 Z1100A3, 83 GS650 Katana
WooHoo, I'm a Man Point Millionaire! https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=234035
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Irn-Bru
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:40 - 08 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

garth wrote:


The shell of that car looks very much like an old pre 2002 Fiat Bravo one Thinking
____________________
KTM 990 SMT & Suzuki DR-Z 400 SM
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Shaft
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:52 - 08 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

^^^^ No great surprise, it's essentially the same car, although every cosmetic panel is different.
____________________
Things get better with age; I'm close to being magnificent........
20 RE Interceptor, 83 Z1100A3, 83 GS650 Katana
WooHoo, I'm a Man Point Millionaire! https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=234035
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DXB
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:29 - 08 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Had a 1996 3.0 liter Spider, bought some parts from Autodelta for it, was an epic car when running, but broke down with monotonous regularity.
____________________
superchargers good
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 120 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 0.55 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 131.92 Kb