Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


The Sound of Engine Revs

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

KingKong
Crazy Courier



Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:48 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: The Sound of Engine Revs Reply with quote

A bit of a strange post, but please bear with me.

I have noticed that sports bikes make various different sounds when they are revved. Was riding with another 600 last night and as we departed each other's company for our separate turn offs, the chap on the R6 revved his engine as a farewell bid.

Well, here's what it sounds like - go to 2m 53s, please:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTf-rNte5Eo

How does one make their revs sound like that, does it have something to do with some sort of customised component?
____________________
Kwak 636 (2005)

Past - 2016 Ninja 300 (dark grey); K4 GSXR 600 (sexy yellow); 2002 CBR600FS; 2004 GSXR 1000; 2006 Kwak 636; 2005 Yamaha XVS 1100 Dragstar (facepalm); 2005 Kwak 636; 2011 Yamaha R125.


Last edited by KingKong on 11:56 - 25 Feb 2012; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

nowhere.elysium
The Pork Lord



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:56 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

What, bouncing it off the limiter? Laughing
____________________
'10 SV650SF, '83 GS650GT (it lives!), Questionable DIY dash project, 3D Printer project, Lasercutter project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

KingKong
Crazy Courier



Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:58 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

nowhere.elysium wrote:
What, bouncing it off the limiter? Laughing


eh? Confused
____________________
Kwak 636 (2005)

Past - 2016 Ninja 300 (dark grey); K4 GSXR 600 (sexy yellow); 2002 CBR600FS; 2004 GSXR 1000; 2006 Kwak 636; 2005 Yamaha XVS 1100 Dragstar (facepalm); 2005 Kwak 636; 2011 Yamaha R125.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:59 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Engine noise comes down to only a few parameters.

Engine capacity, engine configuration, and system. Largely though the system only really affects the volume of the engine, configuration and size are responsible for the tone.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:59 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Engine noise comes down to only a few parameters.

Engine capacity, engine configuration, and system. Largely though the system only really affects the volume of the engine, configuration and size are responsible for the tone.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

KingKong
Crazy Courier



Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:02 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhilDawson8270 wrote:
Engine noise comes down to only a few parameters.

Engine capacity, engine configuration, and system. Largely though the system only really affects the volume of the engine, configuration and size are responsible for the tone.


Thank you; so which type of configuration would render such a sound?
____________________
Kwak 636 (2005)

Past - 2016 Ninja 300 (dark grey); K4 GSXR 600 (sexy yellow); 2002 CBR600FS; 2004 GSXR 1000; 2006 Kwak 636; 2005 Yamaha XVS 1100 Dragstar (facepalm); 2005 Kwak 636; 2011 Yamaha R125.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:20 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

R6 is an inline 4 so take your guess Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

plugger147
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:38 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's being rev'd up to hit the limiter like so...

https://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=US#/watch?v=rRcs856CT_w

Nothing special added, it's like a safety device to stop you over reving...
____________________
Tristan the wrote: just whipped off my trousers to find a big bruise on my arse, caused by matt rear ending me...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

KingKong
Crazy Courier



Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:51 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

plugger147 wrote:
It's being rev'd up to hit the limiter like so...

https://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=US#/watch?v=rRcs856CT_w

Nothing special added, it's like a safety device to stop you over reving...


Link took me to an unrecognised playlist.

Aha... a limiter, now I understand Smile Are there any detriments to having a rev limiter in place?
____________________
Kwak 636 (2005)

Past - 2016 Ninja 300 (dark grey); K4 GSXR 600 (sexy yellow); 2002 CBR600FS; 2004 GSXR 1000; 2006 Kwak 636; 2005 Yamaha XVS 1100 Dragstar (facepalm); 2005 Kwak 636; 2011 Yamaha R125.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:20 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most of wot you hear is from the exhaust.
Fit a different muffler and you get a vastly different sound.

Engine gas flow has an effect.
Engine timing has an effect but Exhaust Note FTW.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

plugger147
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:46 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, that was a mobile link try this one...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRcs856CT_w
____________________
Tristan the wrote: just whipped off my trousers to find a big bruise on my arse, caused by matt rear ending me...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Paulington
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:53 - 25 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

As has been said it's just bouncing off the limiter. All this means is that when it hits the rev limiter (around the redline) the ignition gets cut/fuel stops or anything like that momentarily to stop the engine revving over that pre-determined number.

A limiter is there just for the safety of the engine as the manufacturer has decided that revving over that number could heavily damage the engine. Almost all modern bikes have a rev limiter, same with cars.

No detriment to having one. To make that noise on a bike with a rev limiter just hold the clutch in and pin the throttle back. It will rev, hit the limiter and just keep 'bouncing' off of it until you let the throttle go.

Cheers!
____________________
"Four wheels move the body, two wheels move the soul."
Current Vehicles: '89 Kawasaki KDX200, '99 Yamaha XV535, '00 Honda ST1100 Pan-European, '08 Suzuki GSX-R1000, '08 Mitsubishi Lancer GS4 2.0 TDCi, '15 BMW 1 Series 116d Sport Turbo.
CBT: 27/08/08. Theory: 04/09/09. Module 1: 16/09/09. Module 2: 01/10/09.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

KingKong
Crazy Courier



Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:33 - 26 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aha Surprised That makes a lot of sense now Smile

Thank you very much for clarifying that for me Paulington; Plugger 147; and nowhere.elysium

Thumbs Up
____________________
Kwak 636 (2005)

Past - 2016 Ninja 300 (dark grey); K4 GSXR 600 (sexy yellow); 2002 CBR600FS; 2004 GSXR 1000; 2006 Kwak 636; 2005 Yamaha XVS 1100 Dragstar (facepalm); 2005 Kwak 636; 2011 Yamaha R125.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Jim Mc
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:58 - 26 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reving to 15k without any load can't be healthy for the engine.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

weasley
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:06 - 26 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jim Mc wrote:
Reving to 15k without any load can't be healthy for the engine.


It isn't. The pistons are moving at maximum speed but they aren't being 'pushed' back down by very much pressure (since there's no load and therefore not much fuel being used). Hence the top dead centre turnaround is quite hard on the con rod bearings.
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:48 - 26 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

weasley wrote:
Jim Mc wrote:
Reving to 15k without any load can't be healthy for the engine.


It isn't. The pistons are moving at maximum speed but they aren't being 'pushed' back down by very much pressure (since there's no load and therefore not much fuel being used). Hence the top dead centre turnaround is quite hard on the con rod bearings.


Kack.

If the engine is designed to last at the max continuous RPM it will not harm the engine.

MAX RPM has more to do with inertial/centrifugal forces than load.
An engine at full chat will probably be under more strain than an engine at a no-load max RPM.

But sustained MAX RPM will not be very healthy for any engine under any loading.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:42 - 26 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Walloper wrote:
If the engine is designed to last at the max continuous RPM it will not harm the engine.


So all those Diesel engines that suffer damage from the MOT rev test every year are designed like that. Thanks for clearing that up for me Thumbs Up Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:43 - 26 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

An engine with no load on it, can rev beyond the limit due to the momentum and lack of load, the engine revs will drop down again, but it will over rev.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:34 - 27 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

sickpup wrote:
Walloper wrote:
If the engine is designed to last at the max continuous RPM it will not harm the engine.


So all those Diesel engines that suffer damage from the MOT rev test every year are designed like that. Thanks for clearing that up for me Thumbs Up Wink


I don't think that is the issue and I do not have any relevant info on it but I will investigate toot-sweet.
Engines should be governed to limit max RPM.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:28 - 27 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Engines are not designed to be revved with no load though.

The revs pick up far far faster without a load, and the resolution often not quick enough to "catch" the revs before they over shoot the limiter.

It's common for cars to have 2 limiters, for in gear and not in gear, however, I'd be suprised if this has shifted over to bikes yet, and even then, it would only be on the newest of the models.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:49 - 27 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhilDawson8270 wrote:
Engines are not designed to be revved with no load though.

The revs pick up far far faster without a load, and the resolution often not quick enough to "catch" the revs before they over shoot the limiter.

It's common for cars to have 2 limiters, for in gear and not in gear, however, I'd be suprised if this has shifted over to bikes yet, and even then, it would only be on the newest of the models.


Which manufacturer fits two governors to their engines?

Previously Diesel engines were mechanically governed via linkages now a days most modern Diesels are governed electronically and there is no issue of an engine running past it's designed max RPM without load.
That is called an Overspeed.
Engines overspeed if the fuel system malfunctions or the engine is driven by the load it is carrying.
i.e. A vehicle put into a low gear at high road speed will drive the engine over it's rated Max RPM. Electrical supply can back feed to a generator and drive the engine.

MOT engine smoke tests is done at max RPM but some old cars lose drive belts. Probably the drive belt was near end of service life anyway.
I can't find any reliable information for newer vehicles failing during that test.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dracon
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 10 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:13 - 27 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Walloper wrote:
Which manufacturer fits two governors to their engines?


Honda do.

You can't rev the Type R more than 6k when it's not in gear. In gear, and it'll rev through to 9k.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

L4Isoside
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:23 - 27 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dracon wrote:
Walloper wrote:
Which manufacturer fits two governors to their engines?


Honda do.

You can't rev the Type R more than 6k when it's not in gear. In gear, and it'll rev through to 9k.


Same for my old Mk2 Seat leon!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:53 - 28 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

So what damaging forces at max No Load Speed are at work when the same speed is OK at Full Load?

I think there is a confusion in physics at large in this thread.

Engine RPM is limited by the various moving masses in the engine (and, to a degree, the amount/mixture/type of fuel burned during combustion.)
The masses are moving with MORE stored energy under load than at no load.
1000s of psi combustion gas pressure pushing against the load.

I do not see any reason for a manufacturer to fit limiters (Which I would call them as opposed to governors which not only control max speed but max power too. Vastly different things) for no load speeds unless only to meet emission tests where an idle mixture may produce more NOX etc. Or something more scientific.

Where the hell are the bcf chemists and fizzicysts when needed. Same as the police and taxes I guess.
Rolling Eyes
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

weasley
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:26 - 28 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a degree in Chemistry and have worked in the field of engine oil product development and testing for 20 years. Does that count?
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 178 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 1.37 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 130.48 Kb