Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Nutter? Hallucination?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:19 - 23 Jun 2012    Post subject: Nutter? Hallucination? Reply with quote

An NDE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRSjzY0s0SM&NR=1&feature=endscreen
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Carl_steveo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:50 - 23 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's most likely a book deal there somewhere but I'm calling bullshit.
____________________
Current: Honda Nsr 125
Live: Sunderland
Luke "cant be arsed to read your post, but suck my balls anyway."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pendulum
Traffic Copper



Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:03 - 23 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

His experience reminds me of a recent trip to Amsterdam where I "overindulged". I realised I was dead when I felt and experienced things I did not think were possible to feel in this world. I watched the creation of planets. I existed outside of time yet felt like I was to be tortured for an eternity with echo's of two words I've never heard before and that don't exist in the dictionary (apparently this was my soul ID). I'll never be able to get it in to words all that I experienced, but it was because I was tired, hungry and drunk, and decided smoking a huge great blunt on top of all that was a great idea. It obviously blew my head off and totally fucked up the way my brain works.

The head injury he sustained did exactly the same to him. Nothing more sinister than that. The brain is how we experience the world and if it is damaged / drugged or otherwise altered, so can be the perception of everything. He probably believes in what he says.
____________________
1998 CG125 (Sold) CB500 [+ Clio 172]
Usually_Wrong: I tend to fail more than pass. [Speaking about Theory Practice]
Usually_Wrong: im on unemployment at the moment
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:05 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a pretty good one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3EIU3zyntA&feature=endscreen&NR=1

It's been hypothesised that people dress the entity they meet in 'clothes' that best suit their beliefs and what they expect/want to see.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Benno
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:13 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I ever see one of these videos NOT on the youtube account of some religious organisation I might believe it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:17 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Benno wrote:
If I ever see one of these videos NOT on the youtube account of some religious organisation I might believe it.


Yeah, it makes me cynical too, but I tend to go with how the person comes across. There are some blatantly BS ones though and those kinds are always loaded (the ones I've seen) with a religious nut-job agenda.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Benno
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:27 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
Benno wrote:
If I ever see one of these videos NOT on the youtube account of some religious organisation I might believe it.


Yeah, it makes me cynical too, but I tend to go with how the person comes across. There are some blatantly BS ones though and those kinds are always loaded (the ones I've seen) with a religious nut-job agenda.


Most of the death experience videos I've seen have had a religious slant - as in "ah met jayzus, he say'd ah'd been a good mayn and ah would get a nother chaynce!! prayze jezuss!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:29 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7E6sihLgdU

Tommy, I don't know if I linked you this before but if not you should watch it.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:25 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ain't no way I'm getting into another discussion about this Laughing

I'll watch that though.

In return, have a read of this...

https://www.ukskeptics.com/the-dying-brain.php

Lot of very interesting points in there...it's a bit of a heavier read than the believer website stuff but meets the points rather well.

I've been reading up a bit on NDEs after our discussion so I have some points to think about:-

a) If the consciousness lives on after death, why doesn't everyone have an NDE? Only 18% report it, which seems more inline with the cause being a series of neurological factors which may or may not always occur according to the manner of death, particularly the level or speed of anoxia.

b) People who have nearly died or believe themselves to have died but never actually done so report NDEs. This seems a MAJOR point against these being evidence of life after death.

c) EEG readings are not a reliable measure of cessation of brain activity as it has been shown that they only pick up surface signals. Therefore reports of people hearing things after brain death are not necessarily accurate (although actually it has never been confirmed that NDEs have happened after death).

d) Every single feature of NDEs can be replicated in a living person by meddling with the noggin and some are routinely reported. e.g. Anoxia can create the sensation of passing through a tunnel, as reported by pilots under high G. You can induce NDEs with the correct drugs or by stimulating the right parts of the brain.

e) If NDEs are actually happening after brain activity ceases, how is the brain forming memories of them?

I have been waiting with interest for the results of Sam Parnia's study to confirm OBEs are real by placing pictures on platforms above operating tables to see if people can identify them following on OBE with the right viewpoint. He was meant to have already published last year but is dragging his heels (rumour has it he has had no hits so is continuing until he does presumably).

I discovered however that this has already been done quite a few times before and whilst people have reported OBEs during the trials, there have been no hits on the images (or numbers or words...the method varies). These trials have on the whole been carried out by believers in OBEs so they have the "correct" bias but they certainly don't seem very keen on publishing the negative results which is why you might not know about them from the NDE websites.
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR


Last edited by T0MMY on 20:43 - 25 Jun 2012; edited 2 times in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

temeluchus
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:36 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its fairly obvious-sophisticated biochemical computer gets damaged, starts generating spurious output.

Its sad to see how many will grasp at anything to reassure them death is not the end.
____________________
Some shite cruiser. Now with guns and FREEDOM!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Benno
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:05 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7E6sihLgdU

Tommy, I don't know if I linked you this before but if not you should watch it.


Thanks for that, anything narrated by Morgan Freeman is interesting to me. Good series?

Quote:
Its fairly obvious-sophisticated biochemical computer gets damaged, starts generating spurious output.

Its sad to see how many will grasp at anything to reassure them death is not the end.


I'm terrified of death. It is a terrifying prospect, hence people get into denial. The inevitability of it makes it worse IMO.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:28 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

My god...I'm watching that programme now. Only half way through but what a disingenuous, pseudoscientific bit of quality entertainment it is...no wonder people believe this stuff with the soothing authoritative voice of Morgan Freeman assuring us Laughing

So far I've enjoyed the bit where they entirely dismiss the similarity of anoxic effects in pilots to NDEs on the basis that, yeah they may see bright lights, head through tunnels and have out of body experiences but they don't see their relatives so it's totally different Shocked I would say that was worryingly similar, rather than different.

Took me about 5 seconds to explain why that might be too...pilot at work, having fun in the G machine or man on an operating table facing death...which one is more likely to be thinking about his wife and kids at that moment Thinking

I'm loving the microtubules bit too...got some thoughts on that but I'll wait until the end to see if they cover any of them. I do like the way they present it as having some basis though, rather than just being a very interesting hypothesis with one absolutely fundamental failing...oddly one not mentioned by that programme as yet and I strongly suspect it won't be by the end either Rolling Eyes
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:31 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

T0MMY wrote:
Ain't no way I'm getting into another discussion about this Laughing

I'll watch that though.

In return, have a read of this...

https://www.ukskeptics.com/the-dying-brain.php

Lot of very interesting points in there...it's a bit of a heavier read than the believer website stuff but meets the points rather well.



"The nature of the claim being made by the survivalists should not be underestimated. If true, it would require a truly radical revision of current neuroscience and the known laws of physics. To support such a radical view one would ideally require radical evidence of high quality."

Something like quantum-entanglement maybe?
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:35 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

T0MMY wrote:
My god...I'm watching that programme now. Only half way through but what a disingenuous, pseudoscientific bit of quality entertainment it is...no wonder people believe this stuff with the soothing authoritative voice of Morgan Freeman assuring us Laughing

So far I've enjoyed the bit where they entirely dismiss the similarity of anoxic effects in pilots to NDEs on the basis that, yeah they may see bright lights, head through tunnels and have out of body experiences but they don't see their relatives so it's totally different Shocked I would say that was worryingly similar, rather than different.

Took me about 5 seconds to explain why that might be too...pilot at work, having fun in the G machine or man on an operating table facing death...which one is more likely to be thinking about his wife and kids at that moment Thinking

I'm loving the microtubules bit too...got some thoughts on that but I'll wait until the end to see if they cover any of them. I do like the way they present it as having some basis though, rather than just being a very interesting hypothesis with one absolutely fundamental failing...oddly one not mentioned by that programme as yet and I strongly suspect it won't be by the end either Rolling Eyes


Strange that you dismiss the very even-handed testimony of a neuro-scientist who had an NDE experience himself, especially where he states his brain should not have been capable of hallucinating (or anything else). I mean, he's your actual top-line expert in the matter. And he didn't see jesus either. Laughing
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:04 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:

Something like quantum-entanglement maybe?


Which has what to do with NDEs? This is the age old paranormalist argument..."our ideas need something weird...this is something weird therefore it is evidence for our theory".

Quote:
Strange that you dismiss the very even-handed testimony of a neuro-scientist who had an NDE experience himself, especially where he states his brain should not have been capable of hallucinating (or anything else). I mean, he's your actual top-line expert in the matter. And he didn't see jesus either.


Strange that you dismiss the evidence of every other neuroscientist (the overwhelming majority it would seem) who states his brain would be capable of that sort of hallucination. We already know it can so I'm not even sure why they included that guy. I can link you to hundreds of peer reviewed studies that show this.

Frankly, anyone can have a profound life changing experience from an NDE...if it is a hallucination then by definition it seems totally real to the person having it. In a way he is actually the last person who is able to confirm the reality of what happened to him.
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Derivative
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:26 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
Something like quantum-entanglement maybe?


Hetzer, I asked you to explain this in the other thread repeatedly and you still haven't replied.

If you have some viable reasoning, do feel free to share, but you are rapidly losing my respect for (as far as I can tell) consistently misusing scientific nomenclature.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Benno
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:37 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh god, this through the wormhole series looks brilliant, I think I'm going to be up very late tonight...

Re: this episode; the documentary makes a good show of playing both sides of the argument against each other rather than picking a side and sticking with it. The arguments against [life after death] seem a lot more sensible and realistic than the arguments for, which seem to have shakier foundations. Of course, this could be bias in itself on the part of the editors/makers.

Who knows (anything).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:41 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
And he didn't see jesus either. Laughing


Forgot to mention...he did say he saw god though.

There's little point in arguing about this again, we know it'll go nowhere. I am quite interested in this but I don't think you want to discuss the evidence and confirm whether you should base your entire world view on it, I think you just want to see anything that confirms it and ignore anything that doesn't.

I think I can sum my thoughts on NDEs up like so:-

1. NDEs tend to involve seeing bright lights, passing through tunnels and out of body experiences.

2. Inducing anoxia in people makes them see bright lights, feel like they're passing through tunnels and have out of body experiences.

3. Anoxia occurs during death.

Believe what you want but don't pretend you apply Occam's Razor to this. It's faith and that's fine, it's a free country.
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mistergixer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:25 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

pendulum wrote:
Stuff about getting very stoned...


I once smoked so much weed that I didn't recognise myself when I saw myself in a mirror, all I saw was a very fucked bloke who looked like was on the brink of passing out.

I passed out shortly afterwards.

Sick
____________________
Space Monkey #7
Don Eladio is dead. His capos are dead. You have no one left to fight for. Fill your pockets and leave in peace. Or fight me and die!
Mistergixer's videos on YouTube
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:13 - 26 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Derivative wrote:
Hetzer wrote:
Something like quantum-entanglement maybe?


Hetzer, I asked you to explain this in the other thread repeatedly and you still haven't replied.

If you have some viable reasoning, do feel free to share, but you are rapidly losing my respect for (as far as I can tell) consistently misusing scientific nomenclature.


You didn't watch it properly/at all either then? Rolling Eyes Laughing

The quantum entanglement theory, as applied to after-death continuation of the consciousness, suggests that information can exist in separate locations simultaneously and independently (as any theoretical physicist will tell you, and experiments support the idea). Research into the brain, according to the program, has found structures that indicate the brain is a quantum computer and maybe the information in it is replicated 'out there in the universe', meaning that when the human body dies the information that constitutes the conciousness carries on existing in it's other quantum-entanglement location.

My only reservation is that it implies a need for the universe, when many NDEs report the consciousness leaving the universe. But that's hardly suprising as physicists are barely into quantum-entanglement, much less whatever's beyond that.

It's not just "weirdness" Tommy, there are connections that are becoming clearer and making more sense that appear to offer a connecting of the dots across the boundaries of various mysteries. Telepathy is just one other example of something that could be explained by quantum-entanglement. After all, the universe and every single atom of which it's comprised is nothing more than one huge energy-field. And if all those atoms are connected in more than a simple linear fashion, as entanglement theory suggests, it really does blow the cap off our current concept of reality.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:38 - 26 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:

You didn't watch it properly/at all either then? Rolling Eyes Laughing

The quantum entanglement theory, as applied to after-death continuation of the consciousness, suggests that information can exist in separate locations simultaneously and independently (as any theoretical physicist will tell you, and experiments support the idea). Research into the brain, according to the program, has found structures that indicate the brain is a quantum computer and maybe the information in it is replicated 'out there in the universe', meaning that when the human body dies the information that constitutes the conciousness carries on existing in it's other quantum-entanglement location.

My only reservation is that it implies a need for the universe, when many NDEs report the consciousness leaving the universe. But that's hardly suprising as physicists are barely into quantum-entanglement, much less whatever's beyond that.

It's not just "weirdness" Tommy, there are connections that are becoming clearer and making more sense that appear to offer a connecting of the dots across the boundaries of various mysteries. Telepathy is just one other example of something that could be explained by quantum-entanglement. After all, the universe and every single atom of which it's comprised is nothing more than one huge energy-field. And if all those atoms are connected in more than a simple linear fashion, as entanglement theory suggests, it really does blow the cap off our current concept of reality.


I would suggest that you may have watched it properly but you didn't bother to look into any of it.

I don't want to wind you up and get into another row but this is exactly the problem with getting your information from the entertainment media.

The idea that the brain works as a quantum computer is just an idea...there are no structures that "indicate" this to be the case. The idea came about through computational theory, nothing to do with the anatomy of the brain.

In addition there is a major criticism of the theory (obviously overlooked during Morgan Freeman's studies) in as much as it has been shown that neurons fire 1,000 times slower than the quantum decoherence time. In other words, the brain doesn't operate at the right speed to be using quantum gravity effects...but then you must know all this Hetzer as you must surely look closely at all the evidence you put forward Neutral There are numerous other criticisms of this theory out there too but it's still an interesting idea...although perhaps without meaning as much as you might think.

Even if the brain did work as a quantum computer that still doesn't mean it is communicating with the rest of the universe...that's a hell of a leap of logic. Besides, this doesn't add weight to the idea of consciousness existing after death if the basis of it is quantum effects during brain activity.
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:49 - 26 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well there you go; you're talking about neurons when the research has already gone much finer than that and is looking a far smaller structures within the brain.

We already know the primary differences between us Tommy. I'm very much of an intuitive nature, you are dogmatically empiricist. For me empirical proof is just a nice cap on the bottle, for you it's the entire bottle. To put it another way, and this is not to wind you up or be offensive...I'm standing in a field looking at a woods, you're right in the woods looking at the trees. You're an expert on the nuts and bolts of the machine, I see the machine without knowing much about its nuts and bolts. I have enough of an idea about them to have a rudimentary grasp of how they work, you have enough of an idea about the machine to have a rudimentary idea of what it looks like.

Which is why we can both watch the same program and come away with entirely different ideas and conclusions from it. Vive la difference, ay? Laughing
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:52 - 26 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, and I think you'll find the idea about the brain being 'quantum' came about because they've worked out it shouldn't actually be physically capable of doing what it does given its size.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:01 - 26 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:

Which is why we can both watch the same program and come away with entirely different ideas and conclusions from it. Vive la difference, ay? Laughing


Because you watch it and take it at face value, whilst I watch it and have at least a cursory glance over the theories mentioned.

If you get your information from entertainment shows and websites, it's no wonder you believe in all this stuff so ferociously...it's just sensationalist rubbish Hetzer, surely you know that?
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:15 - 26 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

T0MMY wrote:
Hetzer wrote:

Which is why we can both watch the same program and come away with entirely different ideas and conclusions from it. Vive la difference, ay? Laughing


Because you watch it and take it at face value, whilst I watch it and have at least a cursory glance over the theories mentioned.

If you get your information from entertainment shows and websites, it's no wonder you believe in all this stuff so ferociously...it's just sensationalist rubbish Hetzer, surely you know that?


There you go, starting up the offensiveness again. Brick Wall Rolling Eyes

You assume I take something at face value, you assume that I never do background research or delve into stuff at a deeper level. You assume. I've read Steven Hawking's 'A Brief History of Time', if that's any possible indication to you of how far I've gone into trying to understand stuff like this. I probably don't assimilate data like you, in as much that I don't commit all the fine detail to memory, I absorb a kind of global overview from everything I read.

When it comes to the crunch I believe my strategy, if it can be called that, will prove more beneficial than yours. I prefer to be out in the field looking at the woods, and happy enough to know that I have a good enough idea of what individual trees look like to not need to be standing right next to one. But if I do happen to need a close-up of one I can whip out my binoculars.
You, on the other hand, don't have a similar means of getting out from amongst the trees and seeing the woods as a whole. Unless you'd be prepared to physically remove yourself and take a walk into the field. But your dogmatism has rendered you a cripple pretty much. Your legs aren't up for it.

That's as objective an analysis of your way of thinking I can come up with, not meant to wind you up or be offensive.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 79 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.17 Sec - Server Load: 0.62 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 146.32 Kb