Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Been looking at helmets!

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

DottyDuck
Nearly there...



Joined: 12 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:22 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Been looking at helmets! Reply with quote

Well i have been looking at helmets and have been looking at the safety ratings and noticed this one

https://sharp.direct.gov.uk/testsratings/rst-fusion

now.. i may sound "old fashioned" but! how can someone sell this piece of rubbish that would be more or less useless and yet expect to charge that much?!!

surely these people have a conscience?!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

darthbuttchin
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:30 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pervert, looking at helmets on the internet Wink.

On topic - remember that Sharp ratings aren't the ratings used here (IIRC).

If it's in the shops, it's obviously passed the correct tests (I forget what it's called) to be able to be sold here.

It does seem wrong though, I agree, that a test can suggest it so poor, yet you pay over £100 for it.
____________________
CG125-K1 (1978) - 35 years old and (mostly) going strong! (Restored and rebuilt by my own fair hands).
Call me Tomsk - I am the Flying Womble after all.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Howling TerrorOutOfOffice
Super Spammer



Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:46 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arai, possibly a helmet used the most in professional racing get poor Sharp ratings. Dainese and Schuberth (as used by Schumacher when he rode in the German superbike series) also get poor Sharp ratings.

Sometimes you can spot crappy helmets just by looking at them and trying them on. My old FM helmet had a visible line where the 2 halves were joined.
The Caberg helmet had a thinner(almost flimsy) visor. The paintwork chipped easily and the cheekpads lost firmness and their shape after 9 or so months. Still a decent helmet tho. (replacement cheekpads were quite expensive)
____________________
Diabolical homemade music Bandcamp and Soundcloud
Singer songwriter, Artist and allround good bloke Listen to Andrew Susan Johnston here
The Harry Turner Project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:16 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Re: Been looking at helmets! Reply with quote

DOTTYDUCK wrote:

now.. i may sound "old fashioned" but! how can someone sell this piece of rubbish that would be more or less useless and yet expect to charge that much?!!

A cheese sandwich would pass CE armour tests.

Is your head shaped exactly like their test dummy head? Are you planning to only having one of the impacts they test?
If yes to both, then don't buy this helmet.

Otherwise, it might well be a good helmet that could save your life.

Of course, if you were worried about such things, you'd be working out a way not to crash rather than moaning about helmet ratings on the internet Wink.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DottyDuck
Nearly there...



Joined: 12 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:20 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Re: Been looking at helmets! Reply with quote

G wrote:


Of course, if you were worried about such things, you'd be working out a way not to crash rather than moaning about helmet ratings on the internet Wink.


sorry for moaning Embarassed i just thought it was strange to ask for so much! no i don't plan on crashing Smile but i am wanting a new helmet and check that website to see if it is worth it? what other tests do helmets go through? like is there another website i can look at?

I am wanting a flip up one! so any suggestions that are under £100 mark.. I would be grateful (wish my budget was bigger!).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:23 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Re: Been looking at helmets! Reply with quote

The problem is there's very little 'good' way to work out what makes a helmet a life saver or not.
And, indeed, one that works very well in one situation may be terrible in another.

Data is always going to be a massive guestimate until all helmets have 'black box' sensors in them which send back data from serious accidents, along with detailed CCTV to work out what happened.

A flip up helmet already will make it less safe for various reasons - heavier and more bits that could move.
Especially with a limited budget.

Me; I'd go second hand. But a lot of people don't like that.

What I can be sure of is that fit is very important - way more than Sharp tests.
So go and try on as many helmets as possible and get the one that fits best. An amazing rated helmet won't do the job if your head is bouncing around in it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:31 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

HT wrote:
Arai, possibly a helmet used the most in professional racing get poor Sharp ratings. Dainese and Schuberth (as used by Schumacher when he rode in the German superbike series) also get poor Sharp ratings.


Racers often wear what their sponsors want them to wear, not what's 'best'. But then 'top' racers have thier hats made for them; they aren't the hats with the same colour scheme Joe Public can buy in the shop.

Then, whats iportant in road-racing is not necesserily what's important in road-riding. Traffic only goes one way on a race-track; there's no inconvenient lamp-posts, kerb-stones or parked cars, either. If you come off, you are likely to have a fairly low 'impact' and then slide a long way, before you stop. On the public road, you are likely to have a very big impact and not slide for very long, if at all.

Ratings and testing of helmets is, largely for guidance only. First 'standards' for testing motorcycle helmets were constructed by the British Standards Institute, back in the 1960's in response to the British government, told they couldn't introduce a compulsary helmet law until there was something to say what constituted a motorcycle crash helmet! It was largely based on Ministery of Defence 'standards' for the testing of fighter-pilots helmets and conventional squaddies 'battle' hats!

Some-one once commented that the standard was great, if you were worried about being shot in the head, but rather less inspiring if you were more worried about falling off a motorbike!

To some degree, that's still true! The legacy of the original BSI tests is that they have been encapsulated in law, and successively refined and tweeked over the years, as other agencies have looked to adopt standards for other durastictions, and then in the EU harmonization of them all.

Modern Motorcycle Helmet testing IS a lot more refined these days, but the criteria they measure them by remain pretty much the same; Basically, if they drop something on one, how much of the impact force does the hat absorb? Then how much force does it take to penetrate it? And finally, how resistant is it to being ground away. Its then a case of how many places test.

Interesting to note; in the mid '80's there were two 'standards' of helmet approval, in the UK, 'Type B' approval was the minimum required for a road helmet. 'Type A' was required for road-racing.

Following the logic that if the racers wore it, it HAS to be the best; many road riders spurned the lesser approved Type-B helmets.

Co-Incidentally, many of these were cheaper, 'Polycarbonate' or soft plastic shell helmets; and they often didn't survice the higher penatration forces requiredby Type A approval, or the abrasion resistance tests. However, with a softer shell, that distorted more for any given impact force, they frequently showed a greater amount of impact energy absorbsion, on test. Thesofter shell, resisting less, and spreading inpact force into a wider area of the inner polystyrene 'crumple-zone'.

For a ROAD helmet, where penetration and wear are possibly not as important as high impact absorbsion..... they could often be the 'better' helmet to save your head in a real road scenario.

This is where testing starts to fall down. They are tests, on a bench, in a lab, under 'controlled' conditions.

Real accidents? Well, real accidents do not happen in anything LIKE 'controlled' conditions! And its VERY hard to simulate actual crash scenarios.

LUCK plays an awful large part ion crash survival.

Trick is to do your BEST to avoid the crash in the first-place; USE your head, not stick it in a fancy hat and hope you have 'safety' covered.

That hat?

I cant say. It may be a good helmet not 'optimised' for the tests.... a lot of hats used to get 'tweeked' to put extra strength into the precise spots tested by standards! Easy to tweek teh construction to get artificially good test ratings that way, without making the hat significantly 'better' over all.

OR, it could just be a fairly mediocre hat, that meets minimum legal standards, and the marketing men reckon that air-vent features and fancy paint jobs are better sales features than Sharpe ratings.

Or a mixture of the two.

Bottom line IS.... the important standard is the BS / EU conformity declaration. anything else, is merely for guidance.

And differences between helmets in REAL terms in REAL accidents are small, compared to the variables in the actual accident.

You pick on comfort and fit (IN A SHOP! - not on-line)... and hope for the best. Any helmet that meets minimum BS / EU standards that fits you WELL, gives you as much chance as any other; irrespective of what other standards and ratings it may have.

You fall off - its 99% down to the gods, how hurt you get; not you, not your hat, not the name on the hat, or the ratings it got in a magazine.

FAQ 17.2 What Do I need to Know about Crash Helmets?
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

TheSmiler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:48 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nitro-F347-VN-Satin-Helmet-LARGE/dp/B006AQ4VWG

IF you can get it at any local shop I would try it on, great flip helmet not that heavy, built in sun visor and the vents actually work. Also includes the possibility to add pin lock visors. Although it apparently isn't safe to ride with it up.

I've got one (visor catch at the side broke) other than that its a great helmet and will be using it in the summer without the visor.
____________________
CB125>CG125>GN125>ER5>K100RS>R1100RS>K100RS
A2 completed 23/07/15 Ready for the Golden Crisp Packet
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Jim Mc
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:08 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

darthbuttchin wrote:
On topic - remember that Sharp ratings aren't the ratings used here (IIRC).


Come again?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Paulington
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:21 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Dottyduck.

I've always ignored SHARP ratings, if it's got the correct BSI/ECE-22.05 markings then it's going to "do it's job" so to speak, more important (if buying from a reputable shop) is the fit of the helmet and how it fits your head.

For example, I like AGV helmets but they just do not fit my head, same with Shoei, however, Arai helmets fit me fantastically so I get those. If it's being sold in a reputable shop and has the BSI/ECE-22.05 markings etc, you're good.

Personally I check helmets to see if they are rated to Snell standards, ones to look out for are Snell M2005/M2010 (For Motorcycle Helmets) and SA2005/SA2010. If they pass any of those standard then they will protect your head more than adequately.

As often quoted: "If you have a fifty quid head, buy a fifty quid helmet". Get the best helmet you can afford, however I mean best as in reaches the ECE/BSI/Snell standard (You don't need the FIA-8860 standard for the road) and fits you the best. If a £150 helmet fits you best, bloody get it! However if the helmet that fits you best is £300, don't cheap out for one that doesn't fit you properly, get the one that meets the standards above and fits you best, regardless of name or price. Smile.

Cheers! Thumbs Up.
____________________
"Four wheels move the body, two wheels move the soul."
Current Vehicles: '89 Kawasaki KDX200, '99 Yamaha XV535, '00 Honda ST1100 Pan-European, '08 Suzuki GSX-R1000, '08 Mitsubishi Lancer GS4 2.0 TDCi, '15 BMW 1 Series 116d Sport Turbo.
CBT: 27/08/08. Theory: 04/09/09. Module 1: 16/09/09. Module 2: 01/10/09.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

j.silvs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:28 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

HT wrote:
Arai, possibly a helmet used the most in professional racing get poor Sharp ratings. Dainese and Schuberth (as used by Schumacher when he rode in the German superbike series) also get poor Sharp ratings.

Sometimes you can spot crappy helmets just by looking at them and trying them on. My old FM helmet had a visible line where the 2 halves were joined.
The Caberg helmet had a thinner(almost flimsy) visor. The paintwork chipped easily and the cheekpads lost firmness and their shape after 9 or so months. Still a decent helmet tho. (replacement cheekpads were quite expensive)


The reason behind sharp ratings is that factories (the makers) can now test their own helmets to gain the sharp rating. Bit biased if you ask me.

Also they test one part of the helmet and always in the same place. Arai say that the part they test has nothing to do with the whole strength/safety on the helmet and refuse to compromise saftey in order to get this rating.

This is what my instructor told me anyway.

Also, did you know that a flip up helmet must have a rating for the full face helmet and open face in order to ride with the face up? only Shark and Caberg currently have these ratings.

Crazy!

And also just to add that price doesnt technically mean it is stonger, you generally pay for the weight of the helmet. I am not saying that nitro is near to Arai but shark, HJC etc, if they have the same rating they will give you the best protection but may be less aero dynamic and may weigh more
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daverave999
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:47 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

The SHARP website actually tells you that they go and buy the helmet themselves from a shop so it's not the manufacturers themselves testing at all.
The animation here shows you how they test (multiple positions with multiple levels of force) so it seems to be a reasonable test of their protective capabilities.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:53 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe that Josh is saying that because the SHARP methodology is published and consistent, that manufacturers can tweak their helmets to achieve good SHARP ratings.

Since that's the point of SHARP (ouch), I'm not seeing a problem with it.

Josh.silverman wrote:
Arai say that the part they test has nothing to do with the whole strength/safety on the helmet and refuse to compromise saftey in order to get this rating.

Well, they would say that, wouldn't they?

All ECE helmets also have to pass a 'random impact' test to ensure baseline protection all over, and objectively, a 5* lid is going to protect you better in the SHARP locations. Anything else is marketing.


Josh.silverman wrote:
Also, did you know that a flip up helmet must have a rating for the full face helmet and open face in order to ride with the face up?

That's not what the UK law says.

Even if it did (and it doesn't) there's a defence for reasonable belief that a lid would offer equivalent protection to a BSI or ECE marked lid. A flip face with the flip up could reasonable be believed to offer no less protection than a marked open face lid.

That may not be the way it's interpreted in das Vaterland, but Brussels hasn't stuck their oar in on this issue just yet, and Her Brittanic Majesty's laws still govern us.

Another vote for the Nitro F347. You'll look like a Lego man, but it's got all the Caberg features for 1/2 to 1/3 of the price.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:56 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am one cheap son of a bitch.

I buy cheap helmets if they fit well, my cheapest helmet was £10 Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

j.silvs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:01 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cool I stand corrected, thanks Roger Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mark 37
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:32 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

In your price bracket I would recommend this helmet.

https://www.motostorm.it/en/details.asp?articolo=4043&ref=Google¤cy=GBP

It comes with a pinlock insert. Fits (me) really well. Sharp rating of 5*.

It's downfall is the internal sun visor, it could do with being able to drop another centimetre. When the pinlock is fitted and you've been riding for an hour or so I find I sometimes get a drip of water run down the centre of the visor internally (caused by condensation). I've also found that its periferal vision is not as large as my old helmet (£200 LS2 helmet). You just need to turn your head a little more to compensate.


I would rate this helmet 4.5 out of 5. I've only really listed bad points, but the good far out ways them. Thumbs Up

Cheers,

Mark
____________________
No matter how fast light travels, darkness was always their first.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:49 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Go to a shop, try on helmets. Get one that fits you and you are comfortable with.

I have had helmets from just about every manufacturer going, some good, some not so good. Noisy & quiet etc. etc.

In the end I always gravitate back to top end HJC helmets because I find them the most comfortable helmets for me.

Others will find different and recommend a different brand but the final choice is yours. Remember, if it is sold in the UK it has passed the relevant tests/legislation. It doesn't mean a £500 quid Arai is not a better helmet than a £100 Nitro, It means it isn't necessarily a safer one.

Another thing, it takes time to get used to a helmet. What is comfortable in a shop can give you blinding headaches after an hour on a bike.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:06 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mark 37 wrote:
In your price bracket I would recommend this helmet.

https://www.motostorm.it/en/details.asp?articolo=4043&ref=Google¤cy=GBP

That's £129 with shipping from Italy. 129 is not less than 100. Bugger me though, that's still a good price for a Duke. We really do get ripped off over here.

On the sun visor, that seems to be a common theme, it's the same on my Nitro. There's just no room to shove any more in as Mrs B keeps telling me.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:16 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also had similar issues with the Caberg sun visor.

Incidentally, while I found the Caberg to be overly heavy which caused me other problems when not crashing...
I was initially sceptical of the flimsy feel of the shell. However, it did well when I crashed in it; and research suggests this flexible shell may well help, despite it's flimsy feel.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mark 37
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:45 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Mark 37 wrote:
In your price bracket I would recommend this helmet.

https://www.motostorm.it/en/details.asp?articolo=4043&ref=Google¤cy=GBP

That's £129 with shipping from Italy. 129 is not less than 100. Bugger me though, that's still a good price for a Duke. We really do get ripped off over here.

On the sun visor, that seems to be a common theme, it's the same on my Nitro. There's just no room to shove any more in as Mrs B keeps telling me.


Just giving an example, I don't always have time to do the leg work for OP's. I got mine in November for £108 with free delivery, deluxe helmet bag and a full cleaning/sanatising kit.

If your prepared to look, good deals can be had.

As everyone has said, go to a shop, try them on, go home and check Internet prices. Wink
____________________
No matter how fast light travels, darkness was always their first.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:38 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mark 37 wrote:

As everyone has said, go to a shop, try them on, go home and check Internet prices. Wink


Not everyone, I don't say that. In fact I think it's a c*nts trick. Where will you go to try on helmets in x years time when the shops have closed because people made use of their facilities but didn't purchase from them.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:13 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Josh.silverman wrote:
Also, did you know that a flip up helmet must have a rating for the full face helmet and open face in order to ride with the face up?

That's not what the UK law says.

Yes... this IS true.... but..... why would you WANT to?
https://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w269/teflons-torque/000_A_Misc/schuberth-c3-motorcycle.jpg
I know thatr the Caberg is 'approved' in both positions, BUT... bludy great chin-piece hunged over your forhead and in the breeze?!?
I think some-one said that in the user manual for the Caberg it actually says something like "While legal, its reccomended user does not attempt to ride at more than 30mph in the open possition" and more guff about not being reccomended to try closing it while riding!

One of the things I like about my Evo....
https://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w269/teflons-torque/000_A_Misc/imag2492.jpg
Chin-piece flips right over the top and is 'faired in' so it doesn't catch the wind, and you CAN ride in it 'open' even at speed.

Still mutterings in the user guide about 'closing' before riding, though if you remember to flip the visor up a chink before flipping, and can give it a bunt to lock it into place, it's 'do-able'... though I wouldn't want to try it much over 30 on a winding road!

And its a HEAVY hat. Just shy of 2Kg, almost double what my traditional open face weighs, and a good 30% more than a conventional full-face. And the 'balence' takes some getting used to on your kneck, particularly in the open possition.

Has a great Sharpe rating though Rolling Eyes

I have to say I like it; and its the first 'flip' I have come accross that comes close to offering some of the benefits of an open with those of a full, rather than offering worst of both worlds and few real advantages.

Find it VERY hard to reccomend it to any-one though. Its too expensive for what it is; and I am 'lucky' that I actually found it was a good fit on me. Its not like every-one offers one, you can pick a good fit from another maker, if the Shark isn't snug!
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

redfro
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 24 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:21 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe I'm just expensive but to be honest, I wouldn't wanna buy a lid for under £100. You get what you pay for and personally, I go for the relatively expensive gear, especially for my head. Not ridiculous prices, but I wouldn't pay less than £150 for a new lid. Also hate the idea of the flip up, just cause it's a weak point in hitting the ground, but again. Personal preference.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dave-the-rave
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:39 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

We like the old sayings eh? We're like robots...
''No smoke without fire''
''What goes around comes around''
''You get what you pay for''
etc.

The SHARP tests suggest we don't
always get what we pay for.

Like Heinz's baked beans.

Or helmets.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Derivative
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:42 - 17 Jan 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I honestly find all of this worrying about helmet price rather moronic.

You're juggling axes and worrying about whether the blade is dirty.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 87 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 1.27 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 146.75 Kb