|
|
| Author |
Message |
| DottyDuck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 DottyDuck Nearly there...

Joined: 12 Nov 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 01:22 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: Been looking at helmets! |
 |
|
Well i have been looking at helmets and have been looking at the safety ratings and noticed this one
https://sharp.direct.gov.uk/testsratings/rst-fusion
now.. i may sound "old fashioned" but! how can someone sell this piece of rubbish that would be more or less useless and yet expect to charge that much?!!
surely these people have a conscience?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| darthbuttchin |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 darthbuttchin Scooby Slapper

Joined: 12 Jul 2011 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 01:30 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
Pervert, looking at helmets on the internet .
On topic - remember that Sharp ratings aren't the ratings used here (IIRC).
If it's in the shops, it's obviously passed the correct tests (I forget what it's called) to be able to be sold here.
It does seem wrong though, I agree, that a test can suggest it so poor, yet you pay over £100 for it. ____________________ CG125-K1 (1978) - 35 years old and (mostly) going strong! (Restored and rebuilt by my own fair hands).
Call me Tomsk - I am the Flying Womble after all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Howling TerrorOutOfOffice |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Howling TerrorOutOfOffice Super Spammer

Joined: 05 Dec 2008 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 01:46 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
Arai, possibly a helmet used the most in professional racing get poor Sharp ratings. Dainese and Schuberth (as used by Schumacher when he rode in the German superbike series) also get poor Sharp ratings.
Sometimes you can spot crappy helmets just by looking at them and trying them on. My old FM helmet had a visible line where the 2 halves were joined.
The Caberg helmet had a thinner(almost flimsy) visor. The paintwork chipped easily and the cheekpads lost firmness and their shape after 9 or so months. Still a decent helmet tho. (replacement cheekpads were quite expensive) ____________________ Diabolical homemade music Bandcamp and Soundcloud
Singer songwriter, Artist and allround good bloke Listen to Andrew Susan Johnston here
The Harry Turner Project |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| DottyDuck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 DottyDuck Nearly there...

Joined: 12 Nov 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 02:31 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| HT wrote: | Arai, possibly a helmet used the most in professional racing get poor Sharp ratings. Dainese and Schuberth (as used by Schumacher when he rode in the German superbike series) also get poor Sharp ratings. |
Racers often wear what their sponsors want them to wear, not what's 'best'. But then 'top' racers have thier hats made for them; they aren't the hats with the same colour scheme Joe Public can buy in the shop.
Then, whats iportant in road-racing is not necesserily what's important in road-riding. Traffic only goes one way on a race-track; there's no inconvenient lamp-posts, kerb-stones or parked cars, either. If you come off, you are likely to have a fairly low 'impact' and then slide a long way, before you stop. On the public road, you are likely to have a very big impact and not slide for very long, if at all.
Ratings and testing of helmets is, largely for guidance only. First 'standards' for testing motorcycle helmets were constructed by the British Standards Institute, back in the 1960's in response to the British government, told they couldn't introduce a compulsary helmet law until there was something to say what constituted a motorcycle crash helmet! It was largely based on Ministery of Defence 'standards' for the testing of fighter-pilots helmets and conventional squaddies 'battle' hats!
Some-one once commented that the standard was great, if you were worried about being shot in the head, but rather less inspiring if you were more worried about falling off a motorbike!
To some degree, that's still true! The legacy of the original BSI tests is that they have been encapsulated in law, and successively refined and tweeked over the years, as other agencies have looked to adopt standards for other durastictions, and then in the EU harmonization of them all.
Modern Motorcycle Helmet testing IS a lot more refined these days, but the criteria they measure them by remain pretty much the same; Basically, if they drop something on one, how much of the impact force does the hat absorb? Then how much force does it take to penetrate it? And finally, how resistant is it to being ground away. Its then a case of how many places test.
Interesting to note; in the mid '80's there were two 'standards' of helmet approval, in the UK, 'Type B' approval was the minimum required for a road helmet. 'Type A' was required for road-racing.
Following the logic that if the racers wore it, it HAS to be the best; many road riders spurned the lesser approved Type-B helmets.
Co-Incidentally, many of these were cheaper, 'Polycarbonate' or soft plastic shell helmets; and they often didn't survice the higher penatration forces requiredby Type A approval, or the abrasion resistance tests. However, with a softer shell, that distorted more for any given impact force, they frequently showed a greater amount of impact energy absorbsion, on test. Thesofter shell, resisting less, and spreading inpact force into a wider area of the inner polystyrene 'crumple-zone'.
For a ROAD helmet, where penetration and wear are possibly not as important as high impact absorbsion..... they could often be the 'better' helmet to save your head in a real road scenario.
This is where testing starts to fall down. They are tests, on a bench, in a lab, under 'controlled' conditions.
Real accidents? Well, real accidents do not happen in anything LIKE 'controlled' conditions! And its VERY hard to simulate actual crash scenarios.
LUCK plays an awful large part ion crash survival.
Trick is to do your BEST to avoid the crash in the first-place; USE your head, not stick it in a fancy hat and hope you have 'safety' covered.
That hat?
I cant say. It may be a good helmet not 'optimised' for the tests.... a lot of hats used to get 'tweeked' to put extra strength into the precise spots tested by standards! Easy to tweek teh construction to get artificially good test ratings that way, without making the hat significantly 'better' over all.
OR, it could just be a fairly mediocre hat, that meets minimum legal standards, and the marketing men reckon that air-vent features and fancy paint jobs are better sales features than Sharpe ratings.
Or a mixture of the two.
Bottom line IS.... the important standard is the BS / EU conformity declaration. anything else, is merely for guidance.
And differences between helmets in REAL terms in REAL accidents are small, compared to the variables in the actual accident.
You pick on comfort and fit (IN A SHOP! - not on-line)... and hope for the best. Any helmet that meets minimum BS / EU standards that fits you WELL, gives you as much chance as any other; irrespective of what other standards and ratings it may have.
You fall off - its 99% down to the gods, how hurt you get; not you, not your hat, not the name on the hat, or the ratings it got in a magazine.
FAQ 17.2 What Do I need to Know about Crash Helmets? ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheSmiler |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheSmiler World Chat Champion

Joined: 14 Apr 2011 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 02:48 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nitro-F347-VN-Satin-Helmet-LARGE/dp/B006AQ4VWG
IF you can get it at any local shop I would try it on, great flip helmet not that heavy, built in sun visor and the vents actually work. Also includes the possibility to add pin lock visors. Although it apparently isn't safe to ride with it up.
I've got one (visor catch at the side broke) other than that its a great helmet and will be using it in the summer without the visor. ____________________ CB125>CG125>GN125>ER5>K100RS>R1100RS>K100RS
A2 completed 23/07/15 Ready for the Golden Crisp Packet |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Jim Mc |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Jim Mc Nearly there...
Joined: 28 Dec 2010 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Paulington |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Paulington World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 07:21 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hey Dottyduck.
I've always ignored SHARP ratings, if it's got the correct BSI/ECE-22.05 markings then it's going to "do it's job" so to speak, more important (if buying from a reputable shop) is the fit of the helmet and how it fits your head.
For example, I like AGV helmets but they just do not fit my head, same with Shoei, however, Arai helmets fit me fantastically so I get those. If it's being sold in a reputable shop and has the BSI/ECE-22.05 markings etc, you're good.
Personally I check helmets to see if they are rated to Snell standards, ones to look out for are Snell M2005/M2010 (For Motorcycle Helmets) and SA2005/SA2010. If they pass any of those standard then they will protect your head more than adequately.
As often quoted: "If you have a fifty quid head, buy a fifty quid helmet". Get the best helmet you can afford, however I mean best as in reaches the ECE/BSI/Snell standard (You don't need the FIA-8860 standard for the road) and fits you the best. If a £150 helmet fits you best, bloody get it! However if the helmet that fits you best is £300, don't cheap out for one that doesn't fit you properly, get the one that meets the standards above and fits you best, regardless of name or price. .
Cheers! . ____________________ "Four wheels move the body, two wheels move the soul."
Current Vehicles: '89 Kawasaki KDX200, '99 Yamaha XV535, '00 Honda ST1100 Pan-European, '08 Suzuki GSX-R1000, '08 Mitsubishi Lancer GS4 2.0 TDCi, '15 BMW 1 Series 116d Sport Turbo.
CBT: 27/08/08. Theory: 04/09/09. Module 1: 16/09/09. Module 2: 01/10/09. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| j.silvs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 j.silvs World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| daverave999 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 daverave999 Trackday Trickster

Joined: 15 Nov 2012 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 12:47 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
The SHARP website actually tells you that they go and buy the helmet themselves from a shop so it's not the manufacturers themselves testing at all.
The animation here shows you how they test (multiple positions with multiple levels of force) so it seems to be a reasonable test of their protective capabilities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:53 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
I believe that Josh is saying that because the SHARP methodology is published and consistent, that manufacturers can tweak their helmets to achieve good SHARP ratings.
Since that's the point of SHARP (ouch), I'm not seeing a problem with it.
| Josh.silverman wrote: | Arai say that the part they test has nothing to do with the whole strength/safety on the helmet and refuse to compromise saftey in order to get this rating. |
Well, they would say that, wouldn't they?
All ECE helmets also have to pass a 'random impact' test to ensure baseline protection all over, and objectively, a 5* lid is going to protect you better in the SHARP locations. Anything else is marketing.
| Josh.silverman wrote: | Also, did you know that a flip up helmet must have a rating for the full face helmet and open face in order to ride with the face up? |
That's not what the UK law says.
Even if it did (and it doesn't) there's a defence for reasonable belief that a lid would offer equivalent protection to a BSI or ECE marked lid. A flip face with the flip up could reasonable be believed to offer no less protection than a marked open face lid.
That may not be the way it's interpreted in das Vaterland, but Brussels hasn't stuck their oar in on this issue just yet, and Her Brittanic Majesty's laws still govern us.
Another vote for the Nitro F347. You'll look like a Lego man, but it's got all the Caberg features for 1/2 to 1/3 of the price. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P.addy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P.addy Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 12:56 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
I am one cheap son of a bitch.
I buy cheap helmets if they fit well, my cheapest helmet was £10  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| j.silvs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 j.silvs World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:01 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
Cool I stand corrected, thanks Roger  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mark 37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mark 37 Trackday Trickster
Joined: 27 Jun 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:32 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
In your price bracket I would recommend this helmet.
https://www.motostorm.it/en/details.asp?articolo=4043&ref=Google¤cy=GBP
It comes with a pinlock insert. Fits (me) really well. Sharp rating of 5*.
It's downfall is the internal sun visor, it could do with being able to drop another centimetre. When the pinlock is fitted and you've been riding for an hour or so I find I sometimes get a drip of water run down the centre of the visor internally (caused by condensation). I've also found that its periferal vision is not as large as my old helmet (£200 LS2 helmet). You just need to turn your head a little more to compensate.
I would rate this helmet 4.5 out of 5. I've only really listed bad points, but the good far out ways them.
Cheers,
Mark ____________________ No matter how fast light travels, darkness was always their first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Polarbear |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Polarbear Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 16:06 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
That's £129 with shipping from Italy. 129 is not less than 100. Bugger me though, that's still a good price for a Duke. We really do get ripped off over here.
On the sun visor, that seems to be a common theme, it's the same on my Nitro. There's just no room to shove any more in as Mrs B keeps telling me. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mark 37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mark 37 Trackday Trickster
Joined: 27 Jun 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:45 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Rogerborg wrote: |
That's £129 with shipping from Italy. 129 is not less than 100. Bugger me though, that's still a good price for a Duke. We really do get ripped off over here.
On the sun visor, that seems to be a common theme, it's the same on my Nitro. There's just no room to shove any more in as Mrs B keeps telling me. |
Just giving an example, I don't always have time to do the leg work for OP's. I got mine in November for £108 with free delivery, deluxe helmet bag and a full cleaning/sanatising kit.
If your prepared to look, good deals can be had.
As everyone has said, go to a shop, try them on, go home and check Internet prices.  ____________________ No matter how fast light travels, darkness was always their first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Polarbear |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Polarbear Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 18:13 - 17 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Rogerborg wrote: | | Josh.silverman wrote: | Also, did you know that a flip up helmet must have a rating for the full face helmet and open face in order to ride with the face up? |
That's not what the UK law says. |
Yes... this IS true.... but..... why would you WANT to?
https://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w269/teflons-torque/000_A_Misc/schuberth-c3-motorcycle.jpg
I know thatr the Caberg is 'approved' in both positions, BUT... bludy great chin-piece hunged over your forhead and in the breeze?!?
I think some-one said that in the user manual for the Caberg it actually says something like "While legal, its reccomended user does not attempt to ride at more than 30mph in the open possition" and more guff about not being reccomended to try closing it while riding!
One of the things I like about my Evo....
https://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w269/teflons-torque/000_A_Misc/imag2492.jpg
Chin-piece flips right over the top and is 'faired in' so it doesn't catch the wind, and you CAN ride in it 'open' even at speed.
Still mutterings in the user guide about 'closing' before riding, though if you remember to flip the visor up a chink before flipping, and can give it a bunt to lock it into place, it's 'do-able'... though I wouldn't want to try it much over 30 on a winding road!
And its a HEAVY hat. Just shy of 2Kg, almost double what my traditional open face weighs, and a good 30% more than a conventional full-face. And the 'balence' takes some getting used to on your kneck, particularly in the open possition.
Has a great Sharpe rating though
I have to say I like it; and its the first 'flip' I have come accross that comes close to offering some of the benefits of an open with those of a full, rather than offering worst of both worlds and few real advantages.
Find it VERY hard to reccomend it to any-one though. Its too expensive for what it is; and I am 'lucky' that I actually found it was a good fit on me. Its not like every-one offers one, you can pick a good fit from another maker, if the Shark isn't snug! ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| redfro |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 redfro Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 24 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dave-the-rave |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dave-the-rave Scooby Slapper

Joined: 19 Oct 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Derivative |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Derivative World Chat Champion
Joined: 03 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 88 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|