Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


In line 4 compared to V twins ??

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Scutter
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:00 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: In line 4 compared to V twins ?? Reply with quote

So I was after opinions regarding the engine characteristics of the in-line 4's compared to V-twins...

The reason being, is that I now have this V Strom 650 and it's the first v twin that I've owned. (Incidentally it's also the first fuel injected bike I've owned.) Anyway, although I love the bike I find that it's much more 'snatchy' than the 4's I've had previously. The throttle seems much more ' on or off' than bikes I've ridden before, and even the 600r that I also still own.

Im aware that I've been away from bikes for some time, so it could well be me, but as I said I don't get it on the 600r. I also wondered if it was something to do with it being FI compared to carbs?

Any ideas?

Thanks.
____________________
Current bike: FJR1300
Previous: SS50, GS50, TS50, GP125, NS125, GSX250, GPZ305, GPz550 81 twin shock, GPZ550 UniTrack, GSX550es, 2x GPZ600r, GPZ1000rx, v Strom 650 GT
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:02 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Re: In line 4 compared to V twins ?? Reply with quote

I'd be willing to bet it's down to the FI.

More sophisticated FI systems are pretty smooth, but some of those that are less so are a bit 'snatchy'.
Always found my 675 felt like it needed a delicate touch, while the GSXR1000 could be rolled on smoothly despite having a lot more power.

Same engine in an SV650 is fine.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Scutter
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:21 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

That makes sense, as the engine feels very smooth through the rev range, and as long as I'm overly delicate with the throttle it's fine. I was a bit concerned for when I'm going to be carrying a pillion - ill just have to be a bit more careful! Thanks Thumbs Up
____________________
Current bike: FJR1300
Previous: SS50, GS50, TS50, GP125, NS125, GSX250, GPZ305, GPz550 81 twin shock, GPZ550 UniTrack, GSX550es, 2x GPZ600r, GPZ1000rx, v Strom 650 GT
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

yen_powell
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:25 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've had quite a few V twins and quite a few 4 cylinder bikes and the only snatchy vehicles at low speeds I have owned have both been FI.

I blame the poxy EU making manufacturers do strange things to the fuel mapping to meet over zealous emission tests at certain revs.
____________________
Blackmail is a nasty word........but not as nasty as phlegm!
XT1200Z and a DR350 in bits
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

c-m
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:32 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got a v-twin and the only bike i've ridden with a snatchy throttle is the 2007 VFR, it's absolutely awful
____________________
Motorcycle headlight bulbs and HIDs
Blogging about my bike and trips
https://ridershandbook.com/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

_Troy_
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:40 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd disagree with the above. I have a curvy SV, and completely agree about the snatchy throttle. I've put it down to the vast engine braking making it feel much more on or off. I can't wait to get back on a 4 because of it.
____________________
Current bike: ZX6R J1
Previous bikes: CLR 125 | GS500 | ZX6R G2 | SV650
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:58 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think twins are nice, as they have the useable grunt of an engine of that cc, but because they don't rev that high, you don't have the exciting (but a bit too tempting) top end rush.

IL4 for fun rides on twisty roads at the weekend, twin for leisurely riding without being tempted to ride aggresively.

I think the snatchy fueling at low revs on a lot of bikes, is due to lean fueling to get the bike through emmisions testing.

Typically, the revs you need to do 55mph in top gear, is the revs with the flat spot.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fowlersrs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:09 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

_Troy_ wrote:
I'd disagree with the above. I have a curvy SV, and completely agree about the snatchy throttle. I've put it down to the vast engine braking making it feel much more on or off. I can't wait to get back on a 4 because of it.


I don't think the SV has a snatchy throttle, it's goes up through the rev range very nicely and will overrun well if its kept in a high gear. Where u can have problems is changing down early, that's where u notice the engine slowing but then it's going too with only 2 cylinders!

If u compare the early SV throttle reaction then it's actually pretty good compared to some early IL4's that struggle because of truly woeful fuel injection, that's the worst part of my speed four, the FI lets it down massively, but I live with it!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stonesie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:38 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm the other way round, the SV was a snatchy thing but I got used to it in time, the Triumph is lovely and smooth, or it was until I fitted a 1050 throttle tube Twisted Evil and still nowhere near as harsh as the SV was.

Granted, it is a later and improved injection system than they used on the Speed Four.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nick_Giles
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 01 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:44 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

.
My Hornet (carb version) was 'snatchy' at lower revs.

Balanced the carbs ( only one was out of sync ) and that cured it. Thumbs Up


Nick
____________________
Peter Cook: "I have learned from my mistakes, and I am sure I can repeat them exactly".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:00 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also - Laughing for the 'vast engine braking' - less than a sports 600, I'd say. It's just that the SV is geared lower, so you notice it more.
Had more problems with the R6s locking up or trying to than the SVs when on track.

Never found a curvy SV particular snatchy and I've had five or something as well as having ridden others. They do get lumpy at low revs in a higher gear, but not really the same thing.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Scutter
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:26 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

The bike is great, the engine very responsive and it revs right through to red line freely, so no issues with it generally. I just find that, for example, when slowing for a junction and then seeing its clear so not stopping and accelerating away it 'snatches' causing the bike to jerk. It seems from most opinions that it's due to less than sophisticated FI - and if that's the case - its fine, I'll adapt. Im still enjoying the bike though - so that's all good Laughing
____________________
Current bike: FJR1300
Previous: SS50, GS50, TS50, GP125, NS125, GSX250, GPZ305, GPz550 81 twin shock, GPZ550 UniTrack, GSX550es, 2x GPZ600r, GPZ1000rx, v Strom 650 GT
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogue_Shadow
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:29 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

The V-Twin on the SV Is a great little engine but the engine braking takes a lot of getting used to.
Getting off the throttle can kill the speed before you intend to, I'm teaching myself to downshift much later in my approach.
If I'm riding towards a junction at 40mph in 4th, a simple blip of the throttle and downshift to 3rd will instantly bring my speed to little more than 28mph. It really took me by surprise at first, but now I know to downshift later and keep the throttle on ... Well a work in progress Wink
I do find the throttle response snatchy, but only in low gears at low speeds. Smooth roll on & off ( Thanks Keith Code Laughing )

I imagine other engine configurations like a IL4, would allow the engine to engine brake more progressively / freely.
Might find out one day, till then I'm more than happy with my SV Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Scutter
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:36 - 20 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah Rogue, the engine braking really takes me by surprise! I back the throttle off and it's like I've grabbed a handful of brake! Much, much different from the IL4's I've had in the past that seem to give loads of over run. I'm glad I asked this now Wink
____________________
Current bike: FJR1300
Previous: SS50, GS50, TS50, GP125, NS125, GSX250, GPZ305, GPz550 81 twin shock, GPZ550 UniTrack, GSX550es, 2x GPZ600r, GPZ1000rx, v Strom 650 GT
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

kiddakidda
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:51 - 21 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had the SFV650 Gladius up until June last year. It was pretty smooth and was not snatchy as I remember.

I do know that Suzuki modified the V Twin engine a little when the released the Gladius. I believe they tweaked the inlet system and the modified engine is in the current V Strom & Gladius.

Thumbs Up
____________________
Suzuki SFV 650 (Gladdy) > Triumph Street Triple R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:48 - 21 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogue_Shadow wrote:

I imagine other engine configurations like a IL4, would allow the engine to engine brake more progressively / freely.

As above - not in my experience.
To my mind the only reason some people it would seem notice the engine braking on an SV is the lower gearing - third on a sports 600 is still pretty high, but not so much on an SV. And often people will still use the same gear, despite one bike being geared a chunk lower.
Lower gearing means more torque at the rear wheel.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:37 - 21 Apr 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

yen_powell wrote:
I blame the poxy EU making manufacturers do strange things to the fuel mapping to meet over zealous emission tests at certain revs.


That's pretty much the nub, I think.

But often not so much leaning the fueling map at certain revs, but also over the entire rev-range at fixed revs.

The 'Standards' for engine testing are drafted around testing an engine on an engine brake, rather than a rolling road; so the tests for emmission measurements generally stipulate an engine running at constant rpm, constant throttle, before they sniff the gas mix coming out the exhaust pipe.

On the road, engines don't often run like that, even on a fairly flat, level straight road, like cruising along the motorway, engine speed and throttle will be varying slightly as you maintain following distance or the inclines change.... its 'close' but not identical.

Carburating in the real world, the throttle is changing a lot more widely, the revs changing over the operating range, the 'snatchyness' of some modern fuel injection maps can be in the map-switch from a lean-mix to a richer one, not just between revs, but on 'rates' of throttle opening.

Eg: open the throttle slowly, without revs changing, the map doesn't get as much instant enritchement as if you 'crack' the throttle open.... when you get the same sort of over-rich hesitation, that you can get from doing the same on a 'pumper' carburettor, that is jetted lean, but has a nozzle to squirt a little neat fuel in for acceleration enrichement as the throttle is twisted.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 12 years, 253 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.4 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 99.13 Kb