Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


New electric bike: 0-60 in 3s, 160hp, 140 mile range

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Notj7
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:39 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: New electric bike: 0-60 in 3s, 160hp, 140 mile range Reply with quote

Saw this: https://www.engadget.com/2013/06/04/mission-motorcycles-launches-mission-r-and-rs/

https://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/mission-r-628.jpg

From their website, the bike has:

160 hp at the rear wheel. 120 ft/lbs of torque beginning at 0 RPM. 150 mph top speed. 0-60 in under 3 seconds. ¼ mile in 10.492 seconds.

Fucking eh! Thumbs Up check out the video in the link above, sounds like a spaceship!
____________________
Left the forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Snorty
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:57 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nuts, instant torque.

I'd love to have a go.
____________________
Current: Yamaha FZ1 '07 | GSXR 750 SRAD

Past: CB125TDC | TZR125 | GPZ500 | CBR600F3 | ZX9-R | GSXR1000 K4
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:58 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

but 140 mile range.

I do well over that at a weekend rideout.

I have nothing against electric bikes or cars but until the range is up to sensible levels they are good for nothing.
____________________
Victory Cross Country American tractor.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Nexus Icon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:20 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alright, we're getting somewhere near to useable range but the price!!! It's the Tesla sports car of e-bikes. Good enough to be desirable but too expensive to be economical.

Gimmicks, the both.
____________________
Greetings from Shitsville!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Jim Mc
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:23 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Love the look, but I'm thinking it's not quite feasible yet.

No charging bays at my office. Wonder what the range is didn't see that?

Would worry other road users wouldn't hear me when I'm filtering/overtaking.

Also I think my current bike is 118bhp its 0-100km (62mph) time is 3s. If this thing has instant torque you'd expect it to be a bit quicker?

Apart from that would snap one up in an instant.

Edit:

Just saw the 105 mile standard battery. It depends how economical they're being when testing the battery. If I hoon my bike I get a 90mile range, if I'm sensible 160mi. Still 105 mile is a significant drop.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:59 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Electric motorcycling is very feasible in many situations.

This is not a sensible solution to any of the problems it solves.

Almost £37k at US prices to get a 140 mile - and you can bet that's not 140 miles using the claimed performance it offers.

I would not expect it to be quicker to 0-60 because it's limited by physics - any decent bike can wheelie off the line. Having more torque straight away won't make you any faster.

As far as top speed goes, it seems to be single speed, so there's going to be a payoff in available power vs top speed.
More top speed means more draining batteries quickly too.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ariel Badger
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:13 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

The TT0 bikes are dead after 37 miles.
____________________
Bikers make great organ donors, get 115 on your licence today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Pigeon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Sep 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:29 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's just another type of bike. It has it's own unique characteristics, such has instant torque and bombing along with almost no noise...that would be weird the first few times.

But there's something about combustion. Living creatures died millions of years ago, thousands of people spent billions and worked for years to extract the sludge, only to transport it 1/2 round the world, pass it through an enormous chemistry set, transport it round the country, just so I can put it in my tank and cause it to explode 2,000 times a minute.

That being said, it's a finite resource that is in pretty much everything. So setting fire to it is perhaps not the most sensible thing.
Good fun though Smile And comparatively economical.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Cheeseybeaner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:30 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose its potential feasibility depends on how long the charging time is! Heard of an electric car scheme using petrol stations in France where you'd just leave their drained battery with them and they'd give you a freshly charged one in exchange then on you travel. Doubt it would be that simple with the bikes for a while though.
____________________
My bikes: 2003 KAWASAKI ZRX1200R, 1996 YAMAHA DIVERSION XJ900S
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Deucalion
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 05 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:37 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not claiming any specialist knowledge here but surely bikes lend themselves to electric power far more than cars do. Bikes are very efficient in the weight they carry.

I think an electric commuter bike is a very real possibility in the near future. I read something somewhere recently that there was a breakthrough in battery technology.

Maybe the future C90 will be an E90?

Maybe we should patent it? Cool Laughing
____________________
CB125 (seized it), GS125 (passed test on it) , KLR 250 (Stolen) , RD 350 YPVS (Insurance forced sale) , GPX250 (Girlfriend forced sale) , 20 year gap, ER6f.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ariel Badger
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:47 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was at the Brighton Speed Trials a few years ago and they had a pair of Teslas competing. The paddock marshalls made them bang on the horn when they moved them as they were going to run someone over being so quiet.
There is a reason why god made the internal combustion engine noisy.
____________________
Bikers make great organ donors, get 115 on your licence today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Deucalion
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 05 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:52 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ariel Badger wrote:
I was at the Brighton Speed Trials a few years ago and they had a pair of Teslas competing. The paddock marshalls made them bang on the horn when they moved them as they were going to run someone over being so quiet.
There is a reason why god made the internal combustion engine noisy.


That's nothing spoke clackers couldn't fix !! Laughing
____________________
CB125 (seized it), GS125 (passed test on it) , KLR 250 (Stolen) , RD 350 YPVS (Insurance forced sale) , GPX250 (Girlfriend forced sale) , 20 year gap, ER6f.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:54 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deucalion wrote:
Not claiming any specialist knowledge here but surely bikes lend themselves to electric power far more than cars do. Bikes are very efficient in the weight they carry.

I think an electric commuter bike is a very real possibility in the near future. I read something somewhere recently that there was a breakthrough in battery technology.

Maybe the future C90 will be an E90?

Maybe we should patent it? Cool Laughing

However, electric is heavy and big which doesn't do so well for bikes.

You can already get electric push-bike kits that will give you similar speeds to a c90 with better performance and which work very nicely around town - recharge each day and you've got very cheap commuting, even including the cost of batteries.

However, personally my vision for the future of cars is an electric rear axle stuck on a front wheel drive car - with batteries stuck in the boot. Around town you use it as a 'plug in hybrid' and charge at home every night.

If you want to do a longer run, you might take the batteries out and just go for ICE.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:30 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ariel Badger wrote:
The TT0 bikes are dead after 37 miles.


And an F1 car is dead after 60 laps. They're designed to go that distance as fast as possible, no further.

Electric scooter or commuter bike might work, but bikes are the cheap option on fuel anyway. Electric sports bike while cool, will neither sell well nor change the world.
I'm very pro electric, but the purchase price of electric cars prevents me from owning one any time soon.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:46 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frost wrote:

And an F1 car is dead after 60 laps. They're designed to go that distance as fast as possible, no further.

Electric scooter or commuter bike might work, but bikes are the cheap option on fuel anyway. Electric sports bike while cool, will neither sell well nor change the world.
I'm very pro electric, but the purchase price of electric cars prevents me from owning one any time soon.

But, if they suddenly extended the race by 10 laps, the F1 car could have it's range extended in literally seconds.
(Ok, at a reduced pace thanks to tyre wear.)

The electric vehicle would likely take a good twenty minutes with a super-fast charger at best for those few more laps.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Deucalion
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 05 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:50 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

So is electric the next big thing which is currently in it's infancy, or is there something new around the corner to replace fossil fuels?

Apparently hydrogen makes an efficient fuel but is difficult to manufacture or harvest. Or maybe fossil fuels can be make far more efficient?

Things cannot go backwards, we are not going to start walking or riding horses everywhere.

What will turn out to be the new internal combustion engine?
____________________
CB125 (seized it), GS125 (passed test on it) , KLR 250 (Stolen) , RD 350 YPVS (Insurance forced sale) , GPX250 (Girlfriend forced sale) , 20 year gap, ER6f.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ariel Badger
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:52 - 05 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

20 L (20kg) of liquid fuel gets you around the TT twice and a 100Kg battery pack will get you around once. Electricity is a very heavy fuel.
____________________
Bikers make great organ donors, get 115 on your licence today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Turkish
Crazy Courier



Joined: 09 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:06 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deucalion wrote:
So is electric the next big thing which is currently in it's infancy, or is there something new around the corner to replace fossil fuels?


As this bike demonstrates, the power delivery side of things is all worked out. The problem is battery technology.

Lighter, denser, higher discharge, faster recharge. A few bits of research and progress here and there (mainly for one of the aforementioned only), but things have yet to come together into a commercialised product.

It's also the reason smartphones & tablets have kind of levelled off a bit performance wise the last few years. The screen uses so much battery that the majority of the devices weight (for a tablet, anyway) is the battery itself - sounds a bit silly, right?

Until this situation improves there won't be massive leaps on the electric front. Something like KERS on a motorbike (Prius style) won't really work due to the extra weight, so we are stuck with ICEs for the next generation I would say.
____________________
ZX-6R G2
CBR125R RW6
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:07 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ariel Badger wrote:
20 L (20kg) of liquid fuel gets you around the TT twice and a 100Kg battery pack will get you around once. Electricity is a very heavy fuel.

Not quite the same and similarly on Deucalion's hydrogen...

The electric motor is likely quite a lot lighter than the ICE - and should be a fair bit simpler, though as the power goes up, as with ICEs, you're going to need cooling etc, which can add to complexity and weight.

A 100kg battery pack will get you around once, but doesn't lose anything - it just needs electricity adding.
Unfortunately there's no way to do that quickly with current technology. In the case of something big-budget like F1, I could see them having very fast battery changeover machines that could do it in a similar time to fuelling a car.

Hydrogen IS electric, it's just a different battery technology, however everything else is the same.
The benefit of course is that you can very quickly fill up the battery.

A good example of where electric seems to work ok is hire go karts - sure they're heavy (ie you can buy a complete road registered car of a similar weight!), but that's not a massive issue. Instead of swapping batteries they just make sure some karts are always on charge while others are out being driven - presumably all get filled up over night.

I think electric will be the main stream future, but I can see technology to make fuel 'cleanly' to power these ICEs being developed too.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:17 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

For electric vehicles, I think the best model, is a low power engine charging the small battery, with high torque motor(s) driving the wheel(s).

That way, you can have cheap energy dense fuel providing the energy, instead of big heavy expensive low range batteries.

For a vehicle that is 100% electric, I think in town commuter bikes are far more practical than electric cars, but bit of a niche market.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:23 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Turkish wrote:

It's also the reason smartphones & tablets have kind of levelled off a bit performance wise the last few years. The screen uses so much battery that the majority of the devices weight (for a tablet, anyway) is the battery itself - sounds a bit silly, right?

8 core processors and 1080p screens?

Batteries aren't stopping much there - especially as I believe it's the backlight which uses the power and that's remained constant.

It has helped that the trend is towards bigger phones.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

WindyMiller
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:00 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Hydrogen IS electric, it's just a different battery technology, however everything else is the same.
The benefit of course is that you can very quickly fill up the battery.

140 mile range wouldn't be so bad, if it didn't take 2 hours to recharge the battery. That'd be OK for commuting, but not for longer trips.

Hydrogen has greater potential to be a full replacement for petrol, as you can fill up your tank in the same way. I think * the hydrogen can be manufactured quite easily and I think * I read something about a new way of storing hydrogen that would be safer than, say, the hindenburg. However, the fuel cells require some rare elements, which are expensive, so it's difficult to bring the cost down, or make them in any significant quantities. Yet.

*: I claim no expertise here
____________________
YBR125 SV650S Triumph Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:08 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

140 mile range is a nice weekend jaunt for me, not up to munch miles at the weekends.

I like it, but yeah, double the range or triple it.. Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Scootaloo
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:24 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, so the summary for this thread could be...

"Nearly there, Nearly there"

or

"Are we there yet?!"
____________________
(CBF125 - 09) (CBF125 - 11) (CB-1 - 89) (CBF500 - 06) (Push Bike) (CB-1 - 90) (XL125 - 01) (VF500 - 83) (GPZ500 - 94) (GPZ500 - 95) (GPZ500 - 87) (XV535 - 94) (XV535 - 94) (GPZ500 - 87)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Notj7
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:31 - 06 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scootaloo wrote:
Ok, so the summary for this thread could be...

"Nearly there, Nearly there"

or

"Are we there yet?!"


Pretty much, it's a great pointer to what the future holds in motorcycles and electricity.

Maybe another 10/15 years and (hopefully) we'll have batteries good enough for those sorts of vehicles - until then, looks like we're stuck with our 8 core, 1080p smart phones that run out of battery in half a day!
____________________
Left the forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 114 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.15 Sec - Server Load: 0.56 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 132.18 Kb