|
Author |
Message |
ijmok |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ijmok Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 07 Sep 2012 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
charlie74 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 charlie74 Trackday Trickster
Joined: 03 Mar 2013 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
yambabe |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 yambabe World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 07:11 - 18 Jun 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
yambabe wrote: | While you don't need to cash in the old tax disc it is NOT valid as soon as you have declared SORN on the car. |
The intent of SORN was to make a declaration when VED runs out, or on premature surrendered of the VED task. But last time we chewed over this, I couldn't find anything in the legislation that says or implies that making a SORN declaration actually invalidates the VED.
I'd go further than Paddy and say that there's no need to even tell the DVLA, regardless of what they may have to say about it. This is the outfit that try to make up laws and burdens of proof that don't exist. It's probably advisable to tell them in case it shows up on ANPR and you get a tug, but I can't see it coming to anything.
If OP SORNs the car and the new owner drives it away (with a VED disc on it and without being told that it had been SORNed) then what offence has been committed, and by whom? I can't see one on the statute books. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
ijmok |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ijmok Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 07 Sep 2012 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:20 - 18 Jun 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
If you're really bothered, Proof of Posting is free, the cost is a stamp and an envelope. Contents optional. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
ijmok |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ijmok Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 07 Sep 2012 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
cretin box |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cretin box Nova Slayer

Joined: 29 May 2013 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
yambabe |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 yambabe World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:52 - 19 Jun 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
Being a bit of an anorak and having a slow day at work, I rang the DVLA.
After an awful lot of to-ing and fro-ing they decided that what I said above is correct, that in their opinion a declaration of SORN does indeed invalidate a tax disc even if that disc is not returned for a refund and that a new owner would be driving without valid tax if he subsequently insured the car and didn't tax it again himself.
So I asked for a pointer to the legislation which says this, and they couldn't give me one. I might email my MP........... ____________________ Sod falling in love, I wanna fall in chocolate.  |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 12:53 - 19 Jun 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
yambabe wrote: | Being a bit of an anorak and having a slow day at work, I rang the DVLA.
After an awful lot of to-ing and fro-ing they decided that what I said above is correct, that in their opinion a declaration of SORN does indeed invalidate a tax disc even if that disc is not returned for a refund and that a new owner would be driving without valid tax if he subsequently insured the car and didn't tax it again himself.
So I asked for a pointer to the legislation which says this, and they couldn't give me one. I might email my MP........... |
Which contradicts what another user heard from DVLA.
Time for some abusive letters requesting information to Department of Vindictive Lying Arseholes. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
ijmok |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ijmok Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 07 Sep 2012 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:41 - 19 Jun 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
I suppose this is one situation where being in posession of a valid, in-date tax disc is important.
I can just see how it would look in court if someone was charged with keeping an untaxed vehicle, pleads not guilty and whips out exhibit A for the defence, a valid, in-date tax disc.
Given the amount of fuss the DVLA have historically made about the necessity of posessing the disc itself, and their refusal to refund tax without sticking the actual disc to a form and sending it back it think it would be pretty easy to show posession of disc = taxed.
Anyone know where it is an offence to drive a vehicle which is subject to a current SORN declaration? I've looked and can't find anything. Obviously there are regulations which make it illegal to drive while not taxed and not insured but I can't find anything making it in some way specifically illegal to drive while a SORN declaration has been made.
They make a big thing about there being a potential for a fine of £5000 or 2 years in jail for making a false SORN declaration but I'm damned if I can find where this comes from. Unless they're talking Perjury Act 1911? ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
MarkJ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarkJ World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
ficedula |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ficedula Scooby Slapper
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
ficedula |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ficedula Scooby Slapper
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 15:28 - 19 Jun 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
J.M. wrote: | You're reading it differently to me.
In my previous post, it lists the 3 possible pre-requisites for making a SORN. That's written in legislation, so you can't say "my option isn't listed". If you're making a SORN, it must be one of those 3.
The statement you have highlighted, I don't see how that's explicitly catering for it without surrendering the tax-disk? I can't see anything mentioning SORN whilst a license is in force. Only the ability to do it whilst cancelling the license. That statement isn't a conditional and surely just relates to 3(a) in my previous post? |
But the insurance part of SORN is actually enacted in the road traffic act section 144B (I have just been prosecuted under 144A for not making such a declaration). It doesn't call it SORN, it just makes an exemption from prosecution for no insurance on the folowing points:
Quote: | 5) The fourth condition is that—
(a)the registered keeper is at the relevant time the person keeping the vehicle,
(b)at the relevant time the vehicle is not used on a road or other public place, and
(c)the registered keeper has by the relevant time complied with any requirements under subsection (7)(a) below that he is required to have complied with by the relevant or any earlier time. |
Quote: |
(7)Regulations may make provision—
(a)for the purposes of subsection (4)(b) and (5)(c) above, requiring a person in whose name a vehicle is registered to furnish such particulars and make such declarations as may be prescribed, and to do so at such times and in such manner as may be prescribed, |
The DVLA have chosen to use the same form to do both tasks. In theory, you could make a declaration just for the insurance part as described above.
There is no specific form for this but as I have pointed out previously, there is no actual declaration appended to the signature on a form V890. Just the vehicle details, your name and the date. It satisfies the above being as it is, the required particulars and declarations but it doesn't actually declare anything.
TL;DR
The insurance and tax parts of SORN are enacted totally seperately. The DVLA have chosen use the same form for both but the two actions are not mutually inclusive or in any way linked in law. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 15:56 - 19 Jun 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
J.M. wrote: | In my previous post, it lists the 3 possible pre-requisites for making a SORN. That's written in legislation, so you can't say "my option isn't listed". If you're making a SORN, it must be one of those 3. |
Indeed, but the DVLA do let us make SORN declarations - and record them as such - without satisfying any of those conditions.
So I view it that if I didn't surrender my VED license (tax disc), then it wasn't a valid SORN declaration, but that's their problem, not mine.
And it was a valid declaration for purposes of the continuous insurance farce because because as stinkwheel notes, that doesn't even mention SORN in the primary legislation, it's done by regulations - "send us this form, which we'll also (mis)interpret as a SORN declaration.
And here's the bit that I want to keep hammering on:
If I SORN a vehicle, leave the VED disc in it, sell it to you, and you insure and drive it away, who's committing an offence, and why? ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
Last edited by Rogerborg on 21:38 - 19 Jun 2013; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 12 years, 7 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|