sorry im after advice again rule 29 tribunal rules of proce

[scorps]

had a letter regards a prelim hearing last week, today another letter came stating under rule 29 we have to send a copy of partners paperwork regarding his claim to his old company and they have to send him a copy of their paperwork, we feel out of our depth but have emailed a local solicitors for help , this is frighteningly complex now

is this pretty much usual stuff?
____________________
Do not presume that I am male.

[charlie74]

its the legal process, when you think you cant win a case, bury your opponent in paperwork, and extend the length of the case, all while booking billable hours,

[scorps]

oh flipping bugger and all that, guess we have to plod on, its a matter of pride and the David V Goliath task we feel we are facing. Thank god Im in a union and just have to sit back waiting for my stuff to be sorted. Wish hed been in one lol

Mind it says the judge has issued it on his own initiative
____________________
Do not presume that I am male.

[charlie74]

yeah, im guessing that the judge had to, as they are supposed to operate under full disclosure etc

[scorps]

I know this makes me sound a bit thick but could someone explain what they think paragraph 3 means, I read it as we have to get together with his ex employer to work out what we are saying prior to fighting each other???????
____________________
Do not presume that I am male.

[Skudd]

They have let it get to this stage thinking that you will give up. They will keep trying this until the day at court, then right up to just before the Judge makes a ruling they will give in and offer that they think you will accept, but hoping it is less than the judge awards you. This is where the gamble comes in as the judge may award you less than their offer. But hopefully they wont be as daft as that and settle soon just to get you out of their hair and to keep their profile clean.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".

[charlie74]

translation

before the start of the hearing both you and the other guys must produce a set of 4 documents that you both agree are accurate and compleate summary of the case
these should be in date of event order, and each page numbered ( so that missing pages are obvious)

one of the 4 copies will be logged with the court for its records the other 3 should be presented for the courts use

im assuming your supposed to have a copy each aswell to refer too


this is how i read it anyway

[scorps]

i swear to god ( i dont actually belive in god) i am going to become a master criminal, this honest hard working shite is getting us nowhere

Serious question Charlie, why would the company say my partners are accurate if they dispute his claim, deffo a solicitor to help us but as we will need a no win no fee one we are a bit stuck for choice
____________________
Do not presume that I am male.

[charlie74]

i didnt think you were attracted to a career in politics or banking?

[Tracey Suntan-King]

Scorps, Hi, I've got a really good layman's (woman's) book on representing yourself at Tribunal. PM me and I could post it to you if you like. its written by two solicitors, really clear & easy to follow. I won't be needing it again, phew!

X
____________________
Whether you think you can, or think you can't, you're probably right

[scorps]

Charlie

and a big thank you Tracey, pm sent.
____________________
Do not presume that I am male.

[Tracey Suntan-King]

Have PM'd reply. Book on its way. Sock it to 'em! If all else fails you can lob it across the court room at them.

X

EDIT: I say PM'd, I've either sent you one PM or several but possibly failed spectacularly. Can you let me know?
____________________
Whether you think you can, or think you can't, you're probably right

[scorps]

got you message
____________________
Do not presume that I am male.