Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


IPPR report says vehicle tax should be linked to income

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Vracktal
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:30 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: IPPR report says vehicle tax should be linked to income Reply with quote

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2626233/Charge-families-use-roads-using-pay-drive-technology-says-Labours-favourite-think-tank.html

(Daily Mail link but bear with me here)

Labour's IPPR think tank have suggested that all vehicles should have a GPS tracker installed, and that the amount you drive, the time of day you're driving at and your income should all be used to determine how much you pay for fuel at the pump.

And the reason they want these changes is because tax revenues are falling, due to cars getting more fuel-efficient and people driving less.

Unreal. Rolling Eyes Now watch Labour try and distance themselves from this like it's a fucking leper in the run up to the election.

Full report is here-> https://www.ippr.org/assets/media/publications/pdf/The-long-road-to-ruin_May2014.pdf
____________________
2007 BMW R1200R: On road
2009 BMW G650X Challenge: On road
1975 Norton Commando 850: Off road, awaiting recommissioning
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

dydey90
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:43 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

We already pay through the nose in fuel duty for that.

However, I worked out that I use roughly 1700 litres of fuel per year. This means they'd have to add on 15p/litre at least to cover the tax for my car and bike. Fuel would be over £1.50 within the year.
____________________
This post is probably not serious and shouldn't be taken literally.
Past: CBR125,ER6f NINJA 650, ZZR600 Current: VFR750
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

clancy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:45 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

So there going to pay for every car in the country to have a gps device fitted.... ok then......what happens if you remove it, you pay no tax?
____________________
KLX 300r
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DrSnoosnoo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:46 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Terrific! So the more well off people will not only pay more tax from their wages they'll have to fund other people's driving habits too!
____________________
I'm Sam; Northern, Ginger, Lover
Did have: '95 ZZR600 '83 CG125 '97 ZZR1100 '15 Hypermotard 821 SP Do Have: '10 ZX10R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:54 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!

That baby's got two faces! Shocked

Not that bothered about fantasy 5 Year Plans from the chaterrati: wake me up when zaNu are back in power.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Chalky.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:56 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

It makes much more sense to me to scrap VED and claim the revenue back from fuel. I don't have particularly economical cars, but I can't drive them all at the same time.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DrSnoosnoo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:38 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chalky. wrote:
It makes much more sense to me to scrap VED and claim the revenue back from fuel. I don't have particularly economical cars, but I can't drive them all at the same time.


I'd agree with this.

The bigger the car the more petrol you'd buy and tax you'll pay. But to then talk about taking income into account... it's just silly.
____________________
I'm Sam; Northern, Ginger, Lover
Did have: '95 ZZR600 '83 CG125 '97 ZZR1100 '15 Hypermotard 821 SP Do Have: '10 ZX10R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:47 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chalky. wrote:
It makes much more sense to me to scrap VED and claim the revenue back from fuel..


This was 1st mooted back in the 1980's.
Several bike groups and other transport groups fought against it.

Remember as bikers we would have been worse off given that RFT was a hell of a lot less on bikes.
I think back then the average annual mileage was around 10K for bikes.
Adding 20p to a gallon of fuel meant serious losses for ALL bikers.

Now where many of us pay more RFT than a lot of cars. it would be a money saver Thumbs Up

Added bonus is that there is NO RFT avoidance.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:47 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chalky. wrote:
It makes much more sense to me to scrap VED and claim the revenue back from fuel. I don't have particularly economical cars, but I can't drive them all at the same time.


They'll probably do that too. I mean, they already do but they'll probably do it more.
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Benjums
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 12 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:11 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely the cost of setting something like this up would be astronomical? And be more than the government would loose out, due to cars being more fuel efficient in 5 or more years. I mean how much to develop the tech then pay for it to go into every vehicle on the road and put it into petrol stations?
Good old labour lets spend £100 quid to save 20p
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:26 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Re: IPPR report says vehicle tax should be linked to income Reply with quote

Vracktal wrote:

And the reason they want these changes is because tax revenues are falling, due to cars getting more fuel-efficient and people driving less.


Which is exactly what they wanted us to do. Now we do it, and they try to claw the tax back. Are they really so thick that they didn't see that one coming. Laughing
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
N cee thirty This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Shaft
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:39 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Re: IPPR report says vehicle tax should be linked to income Reply with quote

Wafer_Thin_Ham wrote:
Vracktal wrote:

And the reason they want these changes is because tax revenues are falling, due to cars getting more fuel-efficient and people driving less.


Which is exactly what they wanted us to do. Now we do it, and they try to claw the tax back. Are they really so thick that they didn't see that one coming. Laughing


Perhaps the more pertinent question is, are we really so thick we let it happen?

Oh, wait............
____________________
Things get better with age; I'm close to being magnificent........
20 RE Interceptor, 83 Z1100A3, 83 GS650 Katana
WooHoo, I'm a Man Point Millionaire! https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=234035
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:45 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Benjums wrote:
Surely the cost of setting something like this up would be astronomical?


Probably, but they will probably talk about it being revenue neutral. Not cost neutral. Just means they get the same revenue and don't care if the cost to drivers is far higher

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Suntan Sid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:03 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFS, have you learned nothing?
If a GPS tracking device has to be fitted to your vehicle you will have to pay for it, not the gummerment!
No device = no type approval or no Mot or no insurance = no transport = game over!

Mind you, most of you can be tracked via your phones and dashcams anyway!
____________________
"Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!" Cool
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wonko The Sane
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:52 - 13 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

successive changes have reduced tax for more fuel efficient vehicles, this is a good thing as it's encouraged people to consider engine / vehicle size when buying a new car, smaller more efficient vehicles also cause a bit less pollution than a larger vehicle.

This obviously reduces the revenue to the government in VED (''road tax'' goes straight to the government, your local roads are funded through your council tax)

Some people get free VED, electric / hybrid cars for example

sooner or later, to stop the deficit in VED a flat rate needs to be introduced, for example, £20 a year for the ability to drive a motorised vehicle on the public road + an emissions fee - this would put my £30 a year 1.2 diesel ibiza at £50 a year, encouraging me to, when I come to replace it, choose a small economical car if I can.

or have I missed something here?

If labour push this one through I'm quitting work, claiming the dole and buying a V12 jag and Middle Finger to the system

doesn't help that they're discouraging smoking, how much revenue do they get from fags sold each year?
____________________
Looking to pass your CBT / Bike tests in Bury Lancashire? try www.focusridertraining.co.uk Would recommend.
They're also on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/Focus-Rider-Training/196832923734251
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Shaft
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:03 - 14 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Daffyd wrote:

doesn't help that they're discouraging smoking, how much revenue do they get from fags sold each year?



I'm sitting here, slyly rubbing my hands together and waiting for the day that everyone gives up smoking, drinking and driving, as encouraged by successive governments.

I might have given up all the things I enjoy, but it will be a comfort to see all the anti smoking eco mentallists take it up the arse, when they have to provide the solution to the resulting tax deficit.
____________________
Things get better with age; I'm close to being magnificent........
20 RE Interceptor, 83 Z1100A3, 83 GS650 Katana
WooHoo, I'm a Man Point Millionaire! https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=234035
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:56 - 14 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob Fzs wrote:
Bankers bonus's tax will pay for it to be implemented, they love rattling out that rhetoric.

I'm sure they can squeeze a few more things from the tax on bankers bonuses as they've only earmarked it for eleven different things so far that in total mean they've spent it ten times over. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Wonko The Sane
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:06 - 14 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a thought,

My wife is a community nurse using her car to get to and from appointments in health centres and people's homes so drives during the day as part of her job

Under these plans will she be claiming the 'pay as you go' fee back along with the fuel (as current) or will she just have to foot the bill out of her wage?

If the plan is to introduce this, they're essentially proposing to tax us for going to work if they charge more for driving at busy periods...
____________________
Looking to pass your CBT / Bike tests in Bury Lancashire? try www.focusridertraining.co.uk Would recommend.
They're also on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/Focus-Rider-Training/196832923734251
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
N cee thirty This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:34 - 14 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Youth Jobs Guarantee – £1.04 billion
Reversing the VAT increase - £12.75 billion
More capital spending - £5.8 billion
Reversing the Child Benefit savings - £3.1 billion
Reversing Tax Credit savings - £5.8 billion
More Regional Growth Fund funding - £200 million
Cutting the deficit - ?
Turning empty shops into community centres - £5 million
Spending on public services - ?
More housing - £1.2 billion
Childcare - £800 million

…giving a total of at least £30.695 billion (not including the uncostable commitments to reduce the deficit and more spending on public services).

This is more than ten times the £2.3 billion that was raised by Labour’s bonus tax – that their own Chancellor, Alistair Darling, said could only be a ‘one-off’ – and more than ten times the £2.5 billion that the Government’s permanent bank levy raises every year.

It’s simply not credible for Labour to try and spend the same pot of money more than ten times over on eleven different things.

All Ed Miliband and Ed Balls offer is the same old Labour policy of more spending, more borrowing and more debt. And it’s hardworking people who would pay the price through higher mortgage rates and higher taxes.

From https://sharethefacts.conservatives.com/post/65682095925/how-many-times-can-labour-spend-the-same-pot-of-money
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:37 - 14 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I make a decent living. Mrs Borg makes cakes and babbys.

Her Zafira is registered to me. She usually fills it up.

How much pay?

Eh, it's fantasy. The thought of a government contractor successfully implementing a system to track and correctly stitch up north of 34.5 million vehicles is just risible.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
N cee thirty This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 274 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.64 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 129.82 Kb