Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Question regarding A2 licence and bikes

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

james_c_123
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 10 May 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:10 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Question regarding A2 licence and bikes Reply with quote

So I'm gonna be doing my A2 licence shortly and I was wondering. Do the DVLA/Insurers/Whom it may concern rate bikes that are A2 compliant from the original spec or if you take a dyno of the bike now as standard would they then allow you to restrict it? (hope this makes sense) thanks in advance!

James
____________________
Who ate the pie?
I ate the pie.
Case closed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:33 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

You can restrict it, but only if the bike started life with a manufacturers claimed power below a certain level

All the best

K
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:34 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as I am aware they use the factory specs to define the power output. You would need to restrict it, and have proof of restriction before you take the tests and the bike must comply with the A2 rules.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

josh95
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:48 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah they just have a database of A2 compliant bikes that they check,
you can restrict anything within 50% of its original power
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:54 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

josh95 wrote:
Yeah they just have a database of A2 compliant bikes that they check

Who is/are "they", and on what information are you making this statement?


The correct answer is that there's no correct answer and every tool of the state or the insurance cartel will apply their own interpretation when stitching you up.

Plain common sense would suggest that it has to be the manufacturer's claimed figure, not a tested figure. If the latter was acceptable, you could trivially restrict an H2 to 70kW with a throttle stop (just clamp something on the throttle cable), dyno, then move the clamp go down to 35kW, dyno, and that's you 'legal'.


DVSA have their own list of A2 test bikes:
https://www.dft.gov.uk/motorcycle-test-vehicle-list/

That's not an exhaustive list of bikes that you can ride on an A2 though as it only covers 395cc+, and it's not even strictly accurate either. Some years of some models don't quite meet their criteria.

You can try looking here:
https://a2bikes.co.uk/

But it's suggestive, not definitive, and plain wrong in some places. Most notably that damn 1996-2000 GSX-R600. The 69kW Wikipedia figure that keeps getting quoted for it is a tested rear wheel figure, not the 'net engine power' that matters. There's a spacker on Wikipedia who keeps deliberately hiding that detail, and a2bikes have rejected my comment about it as well for reasons best known to themselves.

tl;dr version is get a Bandit 600/650 or SV650 or something else that's clearly under 70kW if you want to be absolutely sure. Once you start trying to get clever with SRADs, Hornets and Fazers, you're at a very, very small risk of being caught out by a theoretically clued up copper or insurer.

Sorry that's not the clear answer you wanted.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Val
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:08 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Re: Question regarding A2 licence and bikes Reply with quote

james_c_123 wrote:
So I'm gonna be doing my A2 licence shortly and I was wondering. Do the DVLA/Insurers/Whom it may concern rate bikes that are A2 compliant from the original spec or if you take a dyno of the bike now as standard would they then allow you to restrict it? (hope this makes sense) thanks in advance!

James


Here are the LEGAL rules:

Category A2

This is a motorcycle without a side car that:

is at least 395cc
has a power output between 20 kW and 35 kW (26bhp and 46.6 bhp)

There's no upper engine size limit, but:

the power to weight ratio must not exceed 0.2kW/kg means cannot restrict some powerful sport bike
it must not be derived from a motorcycle of more than double its power THIS RULE MEANS YOU CANNOT GET bike with more than 93.2bhp and restrict it

DVSA will accept evidence from manufacturers or official importers that a specific model of motorcycle meets these rules. DVSA will publish this information where it applies to a number of machines of a specific type.


And list of A2 bikes that MAY BE restricted (see my note below):

https://www.dft.gov.uk/motorcycle-test-vehicle-list/

There are 2 routes to ride A2 bike:

1. Get one the has less power as manufactured and comply with A2
2. Get bike that is more powerful BUT also comply with A2 restriction pre-requisites above

Note the DVLA A2 list is for GUIDANCE only! Means if they got it wrong legally it is up that your bike comply!!! For instance, the Triumph Street Triple is listed as A2-legal once restricted to 47kW, but the fact that bike makes 105bhp as standard should, theoretically, make it ineligible. If you want to be 100% legal better ignore the Government list and find machines that have the specs to fit the A2 class.

Read more: https://www.visordown.com/learners/the-5-fastest-a2-motorcycles/23194.html#ixzz3Zjz00ROt


To answer your question Do the DVLA/Insurers/Whom it may concern rate bikes that are A2 compliant?:

DVLA has nothing to do with restrictions and are not concerned as far you riding one. Insurers and cops will be concerned and your proof for restriction will be:

1. Get one the has less power as manufactured and comply with A2 - the manufacturer specifications document. Say Suzuki DR-Z400 has 39bhp
2. Get bike that is more powerful BUT also comply with A2 restriction pre-requisites above - the document for the restriction that has been provided by DVSA certified garage.
____________________
Adrian Monk: Unless I'm wrong, which, you know, I'm not...
Yamaha Fazer FZS 600, MT09, XSR 900
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

james_c_123
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 10 May 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:11 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

So there is absolutely no way I could buy a bike that came with more hp but has lost it and now fits the requirements cos its got old?
____________________
Who ate the pie?
I ate the pie.
Case closed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:18 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

james_c_123 wrote:
So there is absolutely no way I could buy a bike that came with more hp but has lost it and now fits the requirements cos its got old?


No. In a word.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

james_c_123
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 10 May 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:32 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Pinky! So whats the deal with that 96-00 GSXR? MCN also have it as 92BHP but everyone else says no?
____________________
Who ate the pie?
I ate the pie.
Case closed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:20 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

MCN. Rolling Eyes

Here they make a point of saying "it does have an electric start" about a bike that's famously kick-start only.

https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-reviews/kawasaki/klr250/1984/

Did they ride it? Have they even seen one? I doubt it.

Right, that 92hp / 69kW figure comes from here:

https://www.mcnews.com/mcn/articles/2010JanIndex.pdf

It's clearly labelled 'rear wheel HP'.

Wishing won't make it otherwise, and neither will citing Wikipedia, because that's the source for their article on it as well.

If you want A2 and plastic, it'll need to be a fully faired SV650, GSF650A, GS500F, ER6F, 400 IL4 or similar. Not the Gixxer. Forget it.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

james_c_123
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 10 May 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:44 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

So whats peoples thought on the Ninja 400 from the 90's?
____________________
Who ate the pie?
I ate the pie.
Case closed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

wr6133
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:53 - 10 May 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

james_c_123 wrote:
So whats peoples thought on the Ninja 400 from the 90's?


Thumbs Up IL4 400's are great fun, just take time to find a good example
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 130 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.8 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 78.1 Kb