Help & FAQs    Search BCF    Members    Groups    Events Calendar
Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


10% pay rise... because austerity....

 Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :
PostPosted: 13:50 - 16 Jul 2015    Post subject: 10% pay rise... because austerity.... Reply with quote
MPs given go ahead for 10% pay rise to £74,000

Quote:
MPs' salaries will rise from £67,060 to £74,000, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority has announced.
The 10% pay rise has been approved despite Downing Street and a succession of MPs saying it was "not appropriate".
IPSA chairman Sir Ian Kennedy said that MPs' pay had been a "toxic" issue "which had been ducked for decades".
He said the pay rise would not cost any money because it was being combined with cuts to expenses, pension and severance payments for MPs.
The independent watchdog, set up to bring in and run a new expenses and pay system for MPs after the expenses scandal of 2009, says in future MPs' pay would rise in line with average rises in the public sector.


https://i.imgur.com/0QVG5UI.jpg
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 14:14 - 16 Jul 2015    Post subject: Re: 10% pay rise... because austerity.... Reply with quote
CaNsA wrote:
Quote:
Downing Street and a succession of MPs saying it was "not appropriate".




Easy to say when you know you're going to get it anyway Rolling Eyes
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dalemac
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Karma :
PostPosted: 14:15 - 16 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
MP's expenses are just as expensive now as they were during the 2009 expenses scandal.

They say it won't cost us an additional penny, so we can expect the expense claim total to be reduced from £21,980,521.17 to £17,469,521.17 (£4,511,000).

Would anyone like to place bets that this won't reduce by anything like that amount??

I'm still staggered that 650 people can cost the country £65,569,521.17 last year. That's £100,100 a year.

I say just pay them £100k a year in today's money (+ inflation thereafter), completely scrap their expenses, second homes and all that additional fluffy bullshit (they can pay for it out of their wages like everyone else does), ban them from having any additional source of income - taking any backhanders should be viewed as treason and should be punished by death.
____________________
YBR125 -> GPZ500S -> SL1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

monkeybiker
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Karma :
PostPosted: 14:45 - 16 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
Dalemac wrote:


ban them from having any additional source of income


Why?

Unless it interferes with there duties then why can't they take on extra work?

I wouldn't like to have a job were there told me I can't take on extra work provided it didn't conflict with the current job.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dalemac
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Karma :
PostPosted: 15:00 - 16 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
monkeybiker wrote:
Dalemac wrote:


ban them from having any additional source of income


Why?

Unless it interferes with there duties then why can't they take on extra work?

I wouldn't like to have a job were there told me I can't take on extra work provided it didn't conflict with the current job.


Because it is a minefield of conflicting interests.

Company A has an interest in Proposal X. They offer the MP a 'job' or some other tangible benefit. The MP accepts because they are allowed. They are persuaded to vote in favor of company A.

or:

Company A has an interest in Proposal X. They offer the MP a 'job' or some other tangible benefit. The MP refuses because they can't accept or they will lose their job. Company A is now in the spotlight for trying to buy votes. MP votes in a way to best serve the public.

Besides, being an MP should be a full time job anyway, they should have very little time to be taking on second and third jobs.
____________________
YBR125 -> GPZ500S -> SL1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

oldpink
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Karma :
PostPosted: 23:24 - 16 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
easy soloution
do away with second homes, take over / build a hotel type dorm for MP's that need to travel
make them use oyster cards instead of limo's & cabs ( I have to pay my own bus fare to work)
cut subsidised food / drink (I have to buy my own lunch & Beer)
few other tweaks would save millions Thumbs Up
____________________
I have become comfortably numb

Theory & hazard 24-may 2016, CBT 8th June 2016, MOD 1 2nd Aug 2016 Mod 2 2nd-Nov 2016 - Current bike CBR 600 RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :
PostPosted: 23:59 - 16 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
At the end of the day there is only 650 of the bastards, you could pay them a mil each and it would still only cost 0.65bn Which would be bloody good value if the actually run the country properly.

Moaning about MP's salary is just diversion tactics IMO, they are too few in number to cause too much damage to the public purse.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :
PostPosted: 01:30 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
oldpink wrote:
easy soloution
do away with second homes, take over / build a hotel type dorm for MP's that need to travel

I want the people looking after the country to have the rest of their lives made reasonably easy so they can make the most of their time looking after the country.

I don't want them in a situation where they feel stressed and spend the time waiting around on tube stations.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :
PostPosted: 01:41 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
G wrote:
oldpink wrote:
easy soloution
do away with second homes, take over / build a hotel type dorm for MP's that need to travel

I want the people looking after the country to have the rest of their lives made reasonably easy so they can make the most of their time looking after the country.

I don't want them in a situation where they feel stressed and spend the time waiting around on tube stations.


I see what you did there Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :
PostPosted: 09:41 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
smegballs wrote:
At the end of the day there is only 650 of the bastards

https://www.murderuk.com/serial_killers.html

Only about 65 serial killers. We waste far too many resources on an insignificant problem. Might as well just let them get on with it.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :
PostPosted: 10:07 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
G wrote:
oldpink wrote:
easy soloution
do away with second homes, take over / build a hotel type dorm for MP's that need to travel

I want the people looking after the country to have the rest of their lives made reasonably easy so they can make the most of their time looking after the country.

I don't want them in a situation where they feel stressed and spend the time waiting around on tube stations.

A *nice* hotel / apartment complex within easy walk of Westminster that has a permanent room/suite in it for each MP. Build it well. Furnish it well. Give them 1000 square feet each if you want. Each MP gets to use it rent-free as long as they are an MP. Each has an allocated apartment so they can keep their stuff in it. 650 space multi-storey car park next door, for their sole use, again free.

Not even slightly stressful (it's really handy for work). And it'd do away with all that second-home bollocks that's just a free house gravy-train at our expense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :
PostPosted: 10:27 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
G wrote:
I don't want them in a situation where they feel stressed and spend the time waiting around on tube stations.

Can you imagine the kind of crazy decisions they'd make if they had to deal with the same tiresome problems as the governed?

I'm just glad that they can de-stress by expensing 'refreshments' in any of their 8 subsidised private bars.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

monkeybiker
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Karma :
PostPosted: 12:26 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
oldpink wrote:
easy soloution
do away with second homes, take over / build a hotel type dorm for


I've always thought why they don't do this. Totally agree.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :
PostPosted: 13:17 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
Not even slightly stressful (it's really handy for work). And it'd do away with all that second-home bollocks that's just a free house gravy-train at our expense.

Sounds like your suggestion would likely cost a lot more in reality.

You'll need some pretty good sound insulation etc to make sure that people coming and going at all times don't disturb others.

You'll also be further insulating politicians from 'the public' - now any time they're in London they are stuck in political circles all the time.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :
PostPosted: 13:30 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
angryjonny wrote:

A *nice* hotel / apartment complex within easy walk of Westminster that has a permanent room/suite in it for each MP. Build it well. Furnish it well. Give them 1000 square feet each if you want. Each MP gets to use it rent-free as long as they are an MP. Each has an allocated apartment so they can keep their stuff in it. 650 space multi-storey car park next door, for their sole use, again free.

Not even slightly stressful (it's really handy for work). And it'd do away with all that second-home bollocks that's just a free house gravy-train at our expense.


Thumbs Up

If they bought up the old London City offices across the river they could turn that into the 'hotel'. MP's already have a parking place in the carpark under the parliament building, the exercise walking over the bridge would do them good.

It would certainly stop expenses and two homes fraud.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :
PostPosted: 13:36 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
G wrote:
Quote:
Not even slightly stressful (it's really handy for work). And it'd do away with all that second-home bollocks that's just a free house gravy-train at our expense.

Sounds like your suggestion would likely cost a lot more in reality.

A one off cost, unlike now with every new MP money grabbing everything they can including second homes.

You'll need some pretty good sound insulation etc to make sure that people coming and going at all times don't disturb others.

Why is that difficult, Its something every good Hotel already has. Go to an airport hotel and see if it's noisy.

You'll also be further insulating politicians from 'the public' - now any time they're in London they are stuck in political circles all the time.

As if they are accessible to the public now? And what's the difference with them staying in the parliament hotel, or their own private (publicly funded) 2nd homes in London.


____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :
PostPosted: 14:03 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
Polarbear wrote:

A one off cost, unlike now with every new MP money grabbing everything they can including second homes.

Running a hotel (or even apartment block) is a 'one off cost' now?
Well, I know what my next business venture will be, then!

Quote:
Why is that difficult, Its something every good Hotel already has. Go to an airport hotel and see if it's noisy.

I have. I didn't like it because it was too noisy.


Quote:
As if they are accessible to the public now? And what's the difference with them staying in the parliament hotel, or their own private (publicly funded) 2nd homes in London.

Rented homes in London. Which are more likely to be surrounded by people that aren't politicians as is their journey in, even if it's just a cab driver.
Not the public's access to politicians (which is actually pretty good), but the other way around.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :
PostPosted: 14:24 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
Well, if you're going to contradict yourself, I'm in.

G wrote:
Rented homes in London. Which are more likely to be surrounded by people that aren't politicians as is their journey in, even if it's just a cab driver.

Not "people", Londoners.

If they're going to rub shoulders with the proletariat, I'd prefer it to be the ones that elected them.

Tell you what, sell Westminter off to the Arabs or Russkis, use the proceeds to buy them a laptop with a camera and some video conferencing software with a voting function, they can have their little tantrums in the comfort of their own, single home, paid for with their fixed salary.

They don't really debate anyway, not even in committees, they just make self-aggrandising speeches. YouTube can deal with that aspect.

Problem?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike

Last edited by Rogerborg on 15:15 - 17 Jul 2015; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :
PostPosted: 14:33 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
Well yes, but no need to rub London noses in some Scottish being worth over four times their vote! Smile
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

oldpink
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Karma :
PostPosted: 15:16 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
I find my "New" MP very accessible
you can register for an email and you get messages when she is holding public meetings
or there are events happening. also a summary of what she is doing in wastemonger and what votes she took part in
and actively asks for input from her constituents

I still think a central hotel would be far cheaper than a couple of hundred second homes
my last mp (Labour) was claiming £20k between housing & travel in London
and a further £15K for his Wife "Office Staff" to name a few "Expenses" he was claiming

G wrote:
Well yes, but no need to rub London noses in some Scottish being worth over four times their vote! Smile


well the tory's, Labour & lib Dems pleaded with us to stay part of the UK
not our fault labour dropped the ball and imploded leaving the SNP to fill the void
____________________
I have become comfortably numb

Theory & hazard 24-may 2016, CBT 8th June 2016, MOD 1 2nd Aug 2016 Mod 2 2nd-Nov 2016 - Current bike CBR 600 RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :
PostPosted: 15:19 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
G wrote:
Well yes, but no need to rub London noses in some Scottish being worth over four times their vote! Smile

Actually, all Scootch votes are worth nothing except for 20,759 right thinking folks in Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale. Dance!
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :
PostPosted: 15:45 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
G wrote:
You'll need some pretty good sound insulation etc to make sure that people coming and going at all times don't disturb others.

I was thinking more along the lines of timber frame and a bit of plasterboard. Maybe with some wadding inside. Y'know, to match the party walls in the "affordable" terraces they're expecting their subjects to half-buy half-rent.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :
PostPosted: 19:24 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
monkeybiker wrote:

Why?

Unless it interferes with there duties then why can't they take on extra work?

I wouldn't like to have a job were there told me I can't take on extra work provided it didn't conflict with the current job.


If they have no extra income then it should help to prevent policies for personal gain.

If needs be, massively increase their pay, and pay it for life. Just no extra income at all for life.

All the best

K
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :
PostPosted: 20:56 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
Kickstart wrote:
If they have no extra income then it should help to prevent policies for personal gain.

If needs be, massively increase their pay

Bribery prevents corruption, you say?


Kickstart wrote:
and pay it for life. Just no extra income at all for life.

Sure, if we terminate them after one term.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :
PostPosted: 21:49 - 17 Jul 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote
Rogerborg wrote:

Bribery prevents corruption, you say?


Nope, just get reasonable with a decent non corrupt level of pay. And remove any need for other income.

Rogerborg wrote:

Sure, if we terminate them after one term.


While it appeals in some ways, it on a similar level to the Discworld idea of just locking up politicians when they are elected to save waiting for them to break the law.

All the best

K
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 55 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
 You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 
Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.94 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 142.88 Kb