|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Londoner2015 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Londoner2015 Spanner Monkey
Joined: 09 Nov 2015 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 23:51 - 17 Nov 2015 Post subject: Bennett's insurance pricing makes no sense at all! |
 |
|
I got a quote from Bennett to insure an 800 bike for £ 661.93. This was after filling in all the details from their website.
Increasing the excess by £ 100 brings the premium... up to £701!
Leaving the excess as it was by default and adding an Abus Granite Extreme plus 59 U-lock brings the premium... up to... £ 668!
I understand insurers will try every trick in the book to squeeze every possible penny of profit out of us.
I understand an insurer may quote £ 400 while another £ 1,000.
I understand some insurers may give no credit to gps trackers or other security measures.
But how can the premium possibly increase if I add a u-lock? At the very worst it should stay the same!
How can it increase if I increase the excess??
It seems to me these are examples of algorithms gone nuts, like when Amazon priced a biology book at more than $2 million.
I called Bennetts to complain, but the guy on the other end of the line was utterly useless and could only repeat the usual the-computer-says-so script.
Is there any way to complain? The Financial Ombudsman? The Office of Fair Trading? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 23:59 - 17 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
I would assume that statistically, those with u locks declared cost insurance companies more than riders who don't.
Same deal with increasing the excess.
Not declaring the U lock doesn't mean you can't use, if they want to charge you less for not declaring it then that's a good thing isn't it?
What exactly are you complaining about?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Londoner2015 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Londoner2015 Spanner Monkey
Joined: 09 Nov 2015 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 00:37 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Ste wrote: | I would assume that statistically, those with u locks declared cost insurance companies more than riders who don't.
Same deal with increasing the excess.
|
I'm not following. On what planet does increasing the excess cause, all else being equal, the premium to go up? Increased excess means there is less risk for the insurer, not more...
| Ste wrote: |
Not declaring the U lock doesn't mean you can't use, if they want to charge you less for not declaring it then that's a good thing isn't it?
What exactly are you complaining about?  |
Well, first of all their website cannot say in huge letters 'increase the excess to reduce the premium' when the opposite happens: isn't this false and misleading information?
I am complaining that one shouldn't second guess these guys. Would I be charged less if I lived in a different flat in the same building in the same postcode? Would I be charged less if, say, i don't declare the riding qualification I have declared? Would I be charged less if I declared my profession as, say, builder instead of construction worker? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 00:46 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
If people who have a £500 excess cost them in total £10 million in claims each year whilst people who have a £100 excess cost them £5 million in claims each year, you can see why people with a £100 excess would have cheaper insurance prices.
And
https://www.bennetts.co.uk/policy/help-advice/faq/#faq28
"You may be able to lower your insurance premium by choosing to add a voluntary excess"
Anyway, what's the problem, you get cheaper insurance price for not declaring the lock and for having a lower excess, could you be more specific in which part of that you don't like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Londoner2015 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Londoner2015 Spanner Monkey
Joined: 09 Nov 2015 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 01:17 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Ste wrote: | If people who have a £500 excess cost them in total £10 million in claims each year whilst people who have a £100 excess cost them £5 million in claims each year, you can see why people with a £100 excess would have cheaper insurance prices.
|
Do you work for Bennetts? Do you know the details of how its pricing algorithm works?
Why do you assume it must be right and why are you refusing to consider the possibility that whoever programmed it simply messed up big time?
There is such a thing as over-interpreting data (overfitting, in statistical jargon). There may have been more claims by people whose name ends in the letter 'l' than by those whose name ends in the letter 'r' - this doesn't necessarily mean that the two categories are riskier!
Insurers would like us to believe their work is so scientific. Have you ever analysed large amounts of messy, real-life data? I have, and I know from direct experience that it is very difficult to identify proper patterns. Two people looking at the same data can easily reach very different conclusions.
The final page of their website has a slider where you can choose the excess, and a caption indicating: higher excess --> lower premium.
| Ste wrote: |
Anyway, what's the problem, you get cheaper insurance price for not declaring the lock and for having a lower excess, could you be more specific in which part of that you don't like? |
Well, I'm not a big fan of being hostage to badly programmed black box algorithms. If an insurer doesn't want to give credit to, say, a GPS tracker fine, it's its right to do so. But if an insurer applies different prices for no apparently logical reason at all, it makes me feel it's taking me for a ride and pricing my risk randomly, not fairly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 01:36 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
"Two people looking at the same data can easily reach very different conclusions. "
Of course, that's why different insurance companies give different prices.
"Well, I'm not a big fan of being hostage to badly programmed black box algorithms. If an insurer doesn't want to give credit to, say, a GPS tracker fine, it's its right to do so. But if an insurer applies different prices for no apparently logical reason at all, it makes me feel it's taking me for a ride and pricing my risk randomly, not fairly."
Does the higher excess -> lower premiums caption also have an asterisk or something similar?
Go to a different insurance company if you don't like them offering you a cheaper price when not having the u-lock and with a lower excess.
https://i.imgur.com/EUnFNgQ.gif |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 01:40 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Insurance isn't supposed to make sense.
It's designed to obfuscate and be as opaque as possible. ____________________ Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Llama-Farmer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Llama-Farmer World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Jan 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| bamt |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 bamt World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Dec 2013 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ScaredyCat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ScaredyCat World Chat Champion

Joined: 19 May 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| monkeybiker |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 monkeybiker World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 11:38 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| monkeybiker wrote: | It makes sense because if I'm getting fully comp it means I'm more likely to be concerned about my vehicle. With 3rd party only the vehicle is probably cheap and I don't care too much about it. |
That's two different things. It may imply something about the owner, but not about the vehicle when you compare like-for-like quotes and only change the level of cover.
But do you make instant-to-instant riding decisions based on whether you've got fully comp insurance or not? Even if the bike is covered, you'll still get mashed up if you throw it down the road.
That said, I expect that insurers' figures do show some correlation, but that's all they'll show. They don't show the reason and insurers don't need to infer one, sensible or otherwise. I can't fathom some of these risk weightings.
It's sort of nice to have a little mystery in the world, just be prepared to play the game. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| rubyhorse2 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 rubyhorse2 Traffic Copper
Joined: 03 Mar 2015 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 12:16 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
I once got cheaper insurance parking the bike on the main road rather than in a locked garage...go figure
got to love insurance |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| .Chris. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 .Chris. World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 Jun 2007 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pie-Roe |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pie-Roe World Chat Champion

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:56 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Londoner2015 wrote: |
There is such a thing as over-interpreting data (overfitting, in statistical jargon). There may have been more claims by people whose name ends in the letter 'l' than by those whose name ends in the letter 'r' - this doesn't necessarily mean that the two categories are riskier!
|
It's possible that people who's names end in 'l' are generally posher, live in more affluent areas and therefore their claims are less, due to the nature of the crime in the area. Although I would expect that would take it too far. Possibly female Asian names mean more likely to crash, middle class British names from the 60s less likely.
You seem to be angry over nothing. Don't want to pay for insurance, good, get nicked or move to a country you don't need it. ____________________ Previous: GSF600, FZR600 x2, ZXR750, XT600 Tenere, CB125, CZ125, ETZ 250, ER5, CCM R30, DRZ400, RF600x4, RF900x2, GS500, VTR1000F, 640 SMC, CB250 NIGHTHAWK, GT550x3, GPX750 TE610, CB500, X11x2, SV650, ZING 125, TL1000R,CB250 Superdream, CBR1100XX |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:01 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
For the last few years fully comp on my car has been cheaper than TP and TPFT  ____________________ Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MCN Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:14 - 18 Nov 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Insurance fackin' Rocks. When it Pays out.
Why the Butt hurt when we buy it?
I was paid out £6350 for a bike that went missing about 12 years ago.
That's 12 X a £500/year premium. (Although my premiums are not half that.) ____________________ Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MCN Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Yorkshire Geek |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Yorkshire Geek Scooby Slapper
Joined: 02 Jun 2015 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 10 years, 188 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|