Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bennett's insurance pricing makes no sense at all!

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:51 - 17 Nov 2015    Post subject: Bennett's insurance pricing makes no sense at all! Reply with quote

I got a quote from Bennett to insure an 800 bike for £ 661.93. This was after filling in all the details from their website.

Increasing the excess by £ 100 brings the premium... up to £701! Mad

Leaving the excess as it was by default and adding an Abus Granite Extreme plus 59 U-lock brings the premium... up to... £ 668! Evil or Very Mad

I understand insurers will try every trick in the book to squeeze every possible penny of profit out of us.
I understand an insurer may quote £ 400 while another £ 1,000.
I understand some insurers may give no credit to gps trackers or other security measures.

But how can the premium possibly increase if I add a u-lock? At the very worst it should stay the same! Question
How can it increase if I increase the excess?? Question

It seems to me these are examples of algorithms gone nuts, like when Amazon priced a biology book at more than $2 million.

I called Bennetts to complain, but the guy on the other end of the line was utterly useless and could only repeat the usual the-computer-says-so script.

Is there any way to complain? The Financial Ombudsman? The Office of Fair Trading?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:59 - 17 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would assume that statistically, those with u locks declared cost insurance companies more than riders who don't.

Same deal with increasing the excess.

Not declaring the U lock doesn't mean you can't use, if they want to charge you less for not declaring it then that's a good thing isn't it? Confused

What exactly are you complaining about? Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:37 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ste wrote:
I would assume that statistically, those with u locks declared cost insurance companies more than riders who don't.

Same deal with increasing the excess.


I'm not following. On what planet does increasing the excess cause, all else being equal, the premium to go up? Increased excess means there is less risk for the insurer, not more...

Ste wrote:

Not declaring the U lock doesn't mean you can't use, if they want to charge you less for not declaring it then that's a good thing isn't it? Confused

What exactly are you complaining about? Laughing


Well, first of all their website cannot say in huge letters 'increase the excess to reduce the premium' when the opposite happens: isn't this false and misleading information?

I am complaining that one shouldn't second guess these guys. Would I be charged less if I lived in a different flat in the same building in the same postcode? Would I be charged less if, say, i don't declare the riding qualification I have declared? Would I be charged less if I declared my profession as, say, builder instead of construction worker?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:46 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

If people who have a £500 excess cost them in total £10 million in claims each year whilst people who have a £100 excess cost them £5 million in claims each year, you can see why people with a £100 excess would have cheaper insurance prices.

And

https://www.bennetts.co.uk/policy/help-advice/faq/#faq28

"You may be able to lower your insurance premium by choosing to add a voluntary excess"

Anyway, what's the problem, you get cheaper insurance price for not declaring the lock and for having a lower excess, could you be more specific in which part of that you don't like?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:17 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ste wrote:
If people who have a £500 excess cost them in total £10 million in claims each year whilst people who have a £100 excess cost them £5 million in claims each year, you can see why people with a £100 excess would have cheaper insurance prices.



Do you work for Bennetts? Do you know the details of how its pricing algorithm works?
Why do you assume it must be right and why are you refusing to consider the possibility that whoever programmed it simply messed up big time?

There is such a thing as over-interpreting data (overfitting, in statistical jargon). There may have been more claims by people whose name ends in the letter 'l' than by those whose name ends in the letter 'r' - this doesn't necessarily mean that the two categories are riskier!

Insurers would like us to believe their work is so scientific. Have you ever analysed large amounts of messy, real-life data? I have, and I know from direct experience that it is very difficult to identify proper patterns. Two people looking at the same data can easily reach very different conclusions.

Ste wrote:


https://www.bennetts.co.uk/policy/help-advice/faq/#faq28

"You may be able to lower your insurance premium by choosing to add a voluntary excess"

The final page of their website has a slider where you can choose the excess, and a caption indicating: higher excess --> lower premium.

Ste wrote:

Anyway, what's the problem, you get cheaper insurance price for not declaring the lock and for having a lower excess, could you be more specific in which part of that you don't like?


Well, I'm not a big fan of being hostage to badly programmed black box algorithms. If an insurer doesn't want to give credit to, say, a GPS tracker fine, it's its right to do so. But if an insurer applies different prices for no apparently logical reason at all, it makes me feel it's taking me for a ride and pricing my risk randomly, not fairly.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:36 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Two people looking at the same data can easily reach very different conclusions. "

Of course, that's why different insurance companies give different prices.

"Well, I'm not a big fan of being hostage to badly programmed black box algorithms. If an insurer doesn't want to give credit to, say, a GPS tracker fine, it's its right to do so. But if an insurer applies different prices for no apparently logical reason at all, it makes me feel it's taking me for a ride and pricing my risk randomly, not fairly."

The world's smallest violin player, just for you!

Does the higher excess -> lower premiums caption also have an asterisk or something similar?

Go to a different insurance company if you don't like them offering you a cheaper price when not having the u-lock and with a lower excess. Rolling Eyes

https://i.imgur.com/EUnFNgQ.gif
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:40 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Insurance isn't supposed to make sense.

It's designed to obfuscate and be as opaque as possible.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Llama-Farmer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:55 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Insurance is statistics-based magical 8 ball nonsense.


Like Ste said, people with u-locks have probably cost Bennetts more PER POLICY on average than people without. Same with the higher excess.

It makes no sense if you don't understand insurance pricing, i.e. it makes no sense, and its not fair, but it is what it is.


At one point it cost £300 more per year to keep my car in the garage than on the street. Maybe someone's car once caught fire in the middle of the night and burnt the house down so it skewed the payout statistics, or maybe people tend to keep more expensive cars in the garage and cheaper ones on the street.
____________________
Current Bike: 1999 Honda CB600 FX Hornet
Next Bike: I want a CBR-RR. And I want an F800 GS-A. And a VFR 800. Can I have all 3?
Dream Bikes: Honda VFR750R RC30, Honda NSR500, Ducati 996 R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bamt
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:36 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Similarly, as a low-risk customer (older, good driving record, low crime area) it can be cheaper to insure TPFT than TP, or FC rather than TPFT. You'd think otherwise (the insured risk would appear lower), but presumably on a statistical level more people in that otherwise low-risk bracket who insure TPFT make claims than those who go FC.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ScaredyCat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:56 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

One thing to note about Bennetts quote page is that if you get a quote with a low voluntary excess, then increase it and click recalculate, then set it back to what it was originally, the price will go up.

I did this the other day, £179.57 at first going to £182.06 - ok it's not much in this instance, although it's still an increase with exactly the same data, but the result may be different if you're younger or the bike is more powerful etc.. ( quote was for a CB1300S )
____________________
Honda CBF125 ➝ NC700X
Honda CBF125 ↳ Speed Triple
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:11 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Re: Bennett's insurance pricing makes no sense at all! Reply with quote

Londoner2015 wrote:
£661.93. [...] adding an Abus Granite Extreme plus 59 U-lock brings the premium... up to... £ 668!

Bah, adding an Almax and Squire upped my quote by 1/3rd.

Anyway, you're in London, the price probably just rose as you were doing the quote.

Nobody will care except perhaps the Daily Mail. Practice your Sad Face.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

monkeybiker
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:17 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

bamt wrote:
Similarly, as a low-risk customer (older, good driving record, low crime area) it can be cheaper to insure TPFT than TP, or FC rather than TPFT. You'd think otherwise (the insured risk would appear lower), but presumably on a statistical level more people in that otherwise low-risk bracket who insure TPFT make claims than those who go FC.


I get that. 3rd party only would cost me more. It makes sense because if I'm getting fully comp it means I'm more likely to be concerned about my vehicle. With 3rd party only the vehicle is probably cheap and I don't care too much about it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:38 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

monkeybiker wrote:
It makes sense because if I'm getting fully comp it means I'm more likely to be concerned about my vehicle. With 3rd party only the vehicle is probably cheap and I don't care too much about it.

That's two different things. It may imply something about the owner, but not about the vehicle when you compare like-for-like quotes and only change the level of cover.

But do you make instant-to-instant riding decisions based on whether you've got fully comp insurance or not? Even if the bike is covered, you'll still get mashed up if you throw it down the road.

That said, I expect that insurers' figures do show some correlation, but that's all they'll show. They don't show the reason and insurers don't need to infer one, sensible or otherwise. I can't fathom some of these risk weightings.

It's sort of nice to have a little mystery in the world, just be prepared to play the game.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

rubyhorse2
Traffic Copper



Joined: 03 Mar 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:16 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I once got cheaper insurance parking the bike on the main road rather than in a locked garage...go figure Smile

got to love insurance
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

.Chris.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:45 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems a bit odd but it's probably the same sort of reasoning that sees third party insurance sometimes being more expensive than fully comp - i.e. the sort of person who takes out a third party policy is more likely to make a claim. In this case it could be that inexperienced riders, or those with some other reason why their insurance costs are high, use a voluntary excess in the hope of a lower premium, leading to higher losses amongst those with a large voluntary excess. Once people get wind of this, you'd think the phenomenon would disappear, but public perception can take a long time to catch up with reality, and meanwhile there's money to be made...

In the case of a security chain, maybe those who use them tend to have insecure parking arrangements or have some other (well founded) reason to be especially concerned about theft.

Without speaking to their actuaries you won't find a concrete answer.
____________________
Chris
1985 Kawasaki Z550F
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pie-Roe
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:56 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Londoner2015 wrote:



There is such a thing as over-interpreting data (overfitting, in statistical jargon). There may have been more claims by people whose name ends in the letter 'l' than by those whose name ends in the letter 'r' - this doesn't necessarily mean that the two categories are riskier!




It's possible that people who's names end in 'l' are generally posher, live in more affluent areas and therefore their claims are less, due to the nature of the crime in the area. Although I would expect that would take it too far. Possibly female Asian names mean more likely to crash, middle class British names from the 60s less likely.

You seem to be angry over nothing. Don't want to pay for insurance, good, get nicked or move to a country you don't need it.
____________________
Previous: GSF600, FZR600 x2, ZXR750, XT600 Tenere, CB125, CZ125, ETZ 250, ER5, CCM R30, DRZ400, RF600x4, RF900x2, GS500, VTR1000F, 640 SMC, CB250 NIGHTHAWK, GT550x3, GPX750 TE610, CB500, X11x2, SV650, ZING 125, TL1000R,CB250 Superdream, CBR1100XX
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:01 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the last few years fully comp on my car has been cheaper than TP and TPFT Laughing
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:02 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Re: Bennett's insurance pricing makes no sense at all! Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:


Anyway, you're in London, the price probably just rose as you were doing the quote.


But Scotland isn't exactly better is it? I watched Mad Max Fury road and I came away thinking it was a documentary about Glasgow but they got the accents all wrong.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:14 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Insurance fackin' Rocks. When it Pays out.


Why the Butt hurt when we buy it? Thinking


I was paid out £6350 for a bike that went missing about 12 years ago.

That's 12 X a £500/year premium. (Although my premiums are not half that.)
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:16 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Re: Bennett's insurance pricing makes no sense at all! Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:
Rogerborg wrote:


Anyway, you're in London, the price probably just rose as you were doing the quote.


But Scotland isn't exactly better is it? I watched Mad Max Fury road and I came away thinking it was a documentary about Glasgow but they got the accents all wrong.



It was actually filmed on a 'more' derelict stretch of Paisley Road West. Smile

(BTW yer gawny get chibbed ya Cheeky bastirt.)
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Yorkshire Geek
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:10 - 18 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

.Chris. wrote:

Without speaking to their actuaries you won't find a concrete answer.

More chance of getting Jeremy Corbyn to back Trident than get an insurance company to explain its pricing. With most policies more or less on a par profitability depends on being better able to price risk than our competitors. Like credit scoring formulae, it's a trade secret.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:52 - 19 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

rubyhorse2 wrote:
I once got cheaper insurance parking the bike on the main road rather than in a locked garage...go figure Smile

got to love insurance

Because if it's in your garage they know which house has he keys in.

That's an easier steal.
____________________
covent.gardens: lihp is my most favourite member ever
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:11 - 19 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cars are stolen with the keys, bike are just chucked in the back of a van.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:11 - 19 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ste wrote:
Cars are stolen with the keys, bike are just chucked in the back of a van.

Might be a primarily car underwriter just calculating "vehicle" risk though.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:46 - 19 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ste wrote:
Cars are stolen with the keys, bike are just chucked in the back of a van.


Would you still bother chucking it in the back of a van if you could just ride it away?
____________________
covent.gardens: lihp is my most favourite member ever
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 188 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 2.07 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 138.99 Kb