Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


A2 license restrictions for old bike

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

cleggy92
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:45 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Hey guys. Have a question I'm not sure is asked often, as I couldn't seem to find anything anywhere else (though I'm not even sure what to type into Google for this kind of inquiry).

Basically I just passed my A2 not a few hours ago (Woooo!). I'm fancying myself a Suzuki Bandit GSF 400. Thing is, the bike is just over the 47bhp limit for an A2 license holder (54bhp). However the bike is from 1993, so I imagine a few of those bhp's have been lost over the years (I think that's how it works?), if so would it be legal to ride without restriction? I really don't want to have to restrict the bike for the sake of a few bhp, but obviously I want to be legal in the event I get pulled or have a crash (I doubt I would even get the insurance to begin with if not legal).

Of course I'll probably get in touch with the respective authorities on the matter, but I figured I'd ask some fellow bikers their thoughts on the matter first. Perhaps someone else has been in this situation or simply knows how it works? Thanks all the same.

Louis
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DRZ4Hunned
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:03 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's the power output stated by the manufacturer from new.
____________________
DRZ400-SM
FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cleggy92
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:51 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

DRZ4Hunned wrote:
It's the power output stated by the manufacturer from new.


Any idea what the process of having it restricted would involve?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Copycat73
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:03 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

typically washers of a peticular size and shape are fitted into the inlet manifolds .. kits maybe available on-line .. likely e- bay...
try a google search.
____________________
Whatever I post I have no citation and no intention of providing one..
caveat emptor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pdg
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:04 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just googled "suzuki gsf 400 restrictor kit" and got 47 billion results.

The first 2 results were for ebay and amazon where such kits are sold by various people for about sixty english pounds.

There was a youtube video on how to remove restrictors so you could watch that backwards to see how to fit them.
____________________
Any and all advice given should not be followed - if you have to ask it means you don't know so get a man in to do it for you.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

andy_uk
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:05 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

cleggy92 wrote:
Any idea what the process of having it restricted would involve?

To keep Police etc happy, there are these :
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Suzuki-Bandit-GSF-400-Restrictor-Kit-35kW-46-46-6-46-9-47-bhp-DVSA-RSA-Approved-/221515122405

They appear to go between the carb and inlet.
If the fitting's anything like my wife's ER500 then it's a very easy job (I'd never fitted any before and it took me less than half an hour).
____________________
Aprilia Classic 125, GS500E, ER5-A1, ER5-C4, ER6 & an XJ6 project frame...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Copycat73
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:12 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

i note that * A Certificate of Fitment is supplied with every `Kickstart Engineering` Restrictor Kit. `Kickstart Engineering` is a * recognised specialist in restricting vehicles...

personaly i would have it laminated and carry it in me top box or a bag.
____________________
Whatever I post I have no citation and no intention of providing one..
caveat emptor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:14 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

cleggy92 wrote:
I really don't want to have to restrict the bike for the sake of a few bhp, but obviously I want to be legal in the event I get pulled or have a crash (I doubt I would even get the insurance to begin with if not legal).

You'd be surprised, insurers tend to only look into the important stuff (like if you actually have a license) when you have a crash. MCE didn't even ask to see proof of NCD Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cleggy92
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:02 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

M.C wrote:
cleggy92 wrote:
I really don't want to have to restrict the bike for the sake of a few bhp, but obviously I want to be legal in the event I get pulled or have a crash (I doubt I would even get the insurance to begin with if not legal).

You'd be surprised, insurers tend to only look into the important stuff (like if you actually have a license) when you have a crash. MCE didn't even ask to see proof of NCD Confused


I can't say its not tempting. My cousin was on a "50cc" at 16, it was actually and offroad bike which he put in a 200cc engine or something daft like that. Can't say I support his decision, but I also can't say I wouldn't want the same.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:19 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oft asked, rarely answered. It's a non-issue, until it's an issue.

The chances of it testing enough over 35kW to matter are pretty minimal.

However, having a piece of paper saying that it's been restricted to 35kW might be useful.

You really only need the piece of paper, mind.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:54 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

cleggy92 wrote:
if so would it be legal to ride without restriction?

No.. the law states 'manufacturers declared power'
If Suzuki quoted 54bhp when new, then it was a 54bhp bike then, and its still a 54bhp bike now.
Could be running on 3 cylinders like a back of spaners from a flat 'cam'.. 'anticipated wear and tear' is NOT a 'modification of restriction'.. its anticipated wear and tear...
Onus is on you to ensure that any vehicle you use is within your licence entitlement....
Coppa pulls you and says "This thing restricted?"
And you say "No mate, its just knackerd!"
opens two charges; first not ensurig the bike is in accordance with licence entitlements... 'cos you haven't you have done nothing to make or make sure that its power is within your entitlement, next, the 'assumption' that its probably within entitlement by dint of being knackered or half knackered is to admit to vehicle defect.. and lack of diligence on your part towards propper maintenance...
So, coppa's going to start looking at your tyres and your brakes and your bar-grips.. aren't they?

Bottom line.. IF it says in the original sales brochure that a bike makes more than 47bhp then as far as the law is concerned, it will ALWAYS make more than 47bhp, UNLESS you positively do something to change that specification, AND can provide evidence that that HAS positively reduced power to within licence limit, gain an expert opinion ie engineers report or certificate of conformity from a restrictor maker, to justify why that mod will have reduced power to licence limits.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:14 - 18 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:
cleggy92 wrote:
if so would it be legal to ride without restriction?

No.. the law states 'manufacturers declared power'

What 'law' is that, Tef?

Be as explicit as you like in citing the 'law' that you've 'quoted'.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pdg
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:34 - 19 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Teflon-Mike wrote:

No.. the law states 'manufacturers declared power'

What 'law' is that, Tef?

Be as explicit as you like in citing the 'law' that you've 'quoted'.


I've heard the same, but never seen any actual evidence.

I would be very interested so that I have access to out of date information when my son gets to an age where it may affect him.
____________________
Any and all advice given should not be followed - if you have to ask it means you don't know so get a man in to do it for you.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:59 - 19 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Teflon-Mike wrote:

No.. the law states 'manufacturers declared power'

What 'law' is that, Tef?

Be as explicit as you like in citing the 'law' that you've 'quoted'.


"I AM the law" (Judge Tef.)

We apply for a 'Licence' in the UK Razz
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:58 - 19 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here, I'll help.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/97
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/2864/regulation/3/made
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/977/schedule/3/made

Let's see if we can spot the 'quoted' phrase 'manufacturers declared power'.

Well, then let's Google for it:

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q="manufacturers+declared+power"

What's the top hit?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cleggy92
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:05 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:

Coppa pulls you and says "This thing restricted?"
And you say "No mate, its just knackerd!"

You may be correct on the law, I'm not sure, however if that scenario were to play out, I would simply reply with "its already under the required output. No need to be restricted."

The chap selling the bike in question has a dyno reading, hopefully below the 47bhp limit. Though I doubt a dyno chart is likely to be considered proof, it would seem neither is a certificate from a professional restrictor fitter, or so the internet would indicate. The bottom line seems to be that there is no proof other than having the bike opened up for inspection, and having a dyno reading claiming anything under 47bhp would be enough to keep the police from wasting their time having the bike taken away. The way I see it, a bike capable of doing 100mph that is missing its engine, isn't a 100mph bike, its a 0mph bike. I would argue the same for horsepower.

I may have to contact the DVSA for this and get the facts from them. Seems the wording in the law will provide the answer here. They may be able to provide that. If the bike is required to be restricted I may just opt for something up toward the 90something bhp maximum stock output and have that restricted. Seems having a bike restricted from 54bhp to 47bhp when its already likely well below that anyway is going to have some unpleasant results. I may as well be back on my 125.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:04 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

cleggy92 wrote:
Teflon-Mike wrote:

Coppa pulls you and says "This thing restricted?"
And you say "No mate, its just knackerd!"

You may be correct on the law, I'm not sure, however if that scenario were to play out, I would simply reply with "its already under the required output. No need to be restricted."

The chap selling the bike in question has a dyno reading, hopefully below the 47bhp limit. Though I doubt a dyno chart is likely to be considered proof, it would seem neither is a certificate from a professional restrictor fitter, or so the internet would indicate. The bottom line seems to be that there is no proof other than having the bike opened up for inspection, and having a dyno reading claiming anything under 47bhp would be enough to keep the police from wasting their time having the bike taken away. The way I see it, a bike capable of doing 100mph that is missing its engine, isn't a 100mph bike, its a 0mph bike. I would argue the same for horsepower.

I may have to contact the DVSA for this and get the facts from them. Seems the wording in the law will provide the answer here. They may be able to provide that. If the bike is required to be restricted I may just opt for something up toward the 90something bhp maximum stock output and have that restricted. Seems having a bike restricted from 54bhp to 47bhp when its already likely well below that anyway is going to have some unpleasant results. I may as well be back on my 125.


Read the legislation don't rely on nonsense.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:06 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

cleggy92 wrote:
I may have to contact the DVSA for this and get the facts from them.

+1 "Funny"

cleggy92 wrote:
Seems the wording in the law will provide the answer here. They may be able to provide that.

Provided above. There isn't a secret law known only to the DVLA and coppers, although you wouldn't know that from the way that they act.

You're going to have to make a decision based on likelihoods. The likelihood of your insurer asking to see evidence of restriction, the likelihood of ever being stopped, and of the copper knowing about the power limits and knowing that the Bandit 400 claimed over 35kW and caring enough to make an issue out of it and it testing enough over 35kW to invite a prosecution and the CPS having the budget and the inclination to touch it and them not making their usual hash of it.

Are you familiar with the Drake equation?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Copycat73
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:17 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:

Are you familiar with the Drake equation?


try sods law .. its more relevant on planet earth

those on the Milky Way galaxy probably have their own..

PS.. is there not a thread about just such a happenstance some where on here... Question
____________________
Whatever I post I have no citation and no intention of providing one..
caveat emptor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Matt B
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:49 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
You're going to have to make a decision based on likelihoods.


This is true. Can't comment on the insurer bit but I can tell you that in the 15 years I've been back in this country, and riding bikes here, I have not been pulled over once. Likelihood is that if the bike is on the MID, taxed and insured, and you aren't doing something stupid, all will be fine.

However, for the sake of buying a restriction kit and fitting it, is it really worth the chance? In the time you've been trying to justify your (potentially) dodgy (possibly illegal) actions on here, you could have ordered the restrictors and fitted them. Then if the percentages don't play out in your favour you have a restricted bike and no worries.
____________________
stinkwheel: He had an animated .gif of a cat performing fellatio. It's not socially acceptable. It can have real life adverse effects on other people.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:06 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's been a couple. If you stack your unrestricted racebike into a farm gate after overtaking a bunch of horrified Fred-and-Doris witnesses out for their Sunday bimble, then you're making your own luck.

An old naked 400, you'd need an epic fail to end up in the same situation.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Az
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:05 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you'll be fine, according to this site it pushes 48.7 hp at the wheel, so it's bound to have lost more than a 1.7 hp over its years. Many people ride much more powerful bikes near to the 70kw limit without restrictions or a certificate and never encounter issues in the 2 years they've been riding on their A2.

Personally, i'd keep a certificate to hand (it's really not hard to make a convincing one) and if you are to ever be pulled.... The bike's restricted, here's my certificate. But I wouldn't even bring it up if you ever get pulled, just produce a proof of restriction if you're asked (which would be your certificate) which has no legal standing anyway, it's just a promise note pretty much.

Or if you really want to be anal about it, take it to any dyno, pay £30 to have it put on a dyno and see it's power output. If it's under 47bhp happy days, it's £30 wasted but your mind's at ease and if it's above 47bhp and you really want to restrict it, buy one of these restrictor kits and fit it (clicky). If it's anything like my Bandit 600 they fit in the carb' inlet rubbers & it's not too time consuming to fit. If you're not mechanically minded, it wouldn't take a mechanic more than 1.5hr to fit imo.

Saying all that (and sorry for the Tef' like post)... the real question should be, why have you picked a Bandit 400 as your weapon of choice? Shocked
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:50 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike Reply with quote

Matt B wrote:

This is true. Can't comment on the insurer bit but I can tell you that in the 15 years I've been back in this country, and riding bikes here, I have not been pulled over once. Likelihood is that if the bike is on the MID, taxed and insured, and you aren't doing something stupid, all will be fine.

Try riding a dirt bike in an urban area Smile

Most people do get away from it, however people on this forum have had issues with insurers wanting to see a restriction certificate, or police putting their bike on a dyno.

I'd agree with printing yourself a convincing looking certificate in this case is the way to go, as the bikes probably under the limit anyway, otherwise I would restrict the bike.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cleggy92
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:22 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

MCN wrote:
Read the legislation don't rely on nonsense.


I was hoping the DVSA would be able to provide said legislation. Although from what Rogerborg said, that may not be the case. I'll drop them an email all the same.

Matt B wrote:
However, for the sake of buying a restriction kit and fitting it, is it really worth the chance? In the time you've been trying to justify your (potentially) dodgy (possibly illegal) actions on here, you could have ordered the restrictors and fitted them. Then if the percentages don't play out in your favour you have a restricted bike and no worries.


I'm sensing some hostility here. I never once tried to justify any illegal actions. I would appreciate if you would refrain from unfounded accusations. I'm here to inquire about the possibility of an old bike losing some horsepower and thus being under the required limit for an A2 license holder. I also stated I fancy myself a Bandit 400. I don't own one, so why would I buy a restrictor now?

Az wrote:
Or if you really want to be anal about it, take it to any dyno, pay £30 to have it put on a dyno and see it's power output. If it's under 47bhp happy days, it's £30 wasted but your mind's at ease and if it's above 47bhp and you really want to restrict it,


The bike I'm looking at already has a dyno sheet. So I guess this could be useful since, as you say, a certificate has no real legal standing. Appreciate the input, Az!

Az wrote:
Saying all that (and sorry for the Tef' like post)... the real question should be, why have you picked a Bandit 400 as your weapon of choice?


It wasn't the model I was interested in per se, but a specific bike I had seen for sale. It was in my price range (no more than £1500, which is why I'm looking at older bikes) and it clearly had been looked after and looked very nice (paint job and other cosmetics). I also thought it would go under the hp limit nicely, I now realize its more complicated than I imaged. I'm now looking at some GSF 600's, which would no doubt need restricting. However they'll be better if I get my unrestricted license when I turn 24. Do you think the Bandit 400 would be a bad choice?

Thanks for all the input guys, its provided me with some clarity. Happy I didn't jump the gun and buy the bike straight away. I can be a bit of an impulse buyer but I have shown restraint!

Louis
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:03 - 21 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

howmanyleft.co.uk reckons there are only 17 GSF 400s left in the UK, the majority of which are on SORN. WeMoto have a fair amount of parts, but owner support is likely to be limited.

Contrast with a Bandit 600. Vastly more around, so you'll be less likely to convince yourself that a lemon is a peach. Tons of spare parts - literally tons, most of them anodised - and everybody and their dog has had one or worked on one so any problems will be shallow.

You'd have to really want a 400 to seek one out now.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 264 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 0.53 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 145.5 Kb