|
|
| Author |
Message |
| cleggy92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cleggy92 Derestricted Danger
Joined: 18 Dec 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| DRZ4Hunned |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 DRZ4Hunned World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cleggy92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cleggy92 Derestricted Danger
Joined: 18 Dec 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Copycat73 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Copycat73 World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Jan 2013 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pdg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pdg World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Sep 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| andy_uk |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 andy_uk World Chat Champion

Joined: 13 Aug 2011 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Copycat73 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Copycat73 World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Jan 2013 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cleggy92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cleggy92 Derestricted Danger
Joined: 18 Dec 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:19 - 18 Dec 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Oft asked, rarely answered. It's a non-issue, until it's an issue.
The chances of it testing enough over 35kW to matter are pretty minimal.
However, having a piece of paper saying that it's been restricted to 35kW might be useful.
You really only need the piece of paper, mind. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:54 - 18 Dec 2015 Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike |
 |
|
| cleggy92 wrote: | if so would it be legal to ride without restriction? |
No.. the law states 'manufacturers declared power'
If Suzuki quoted 54bhp when new, then it was a 54bhp bike then, and its still a 54bhp bike now.
Could be running on 3 cylinders like a back of spaners from a flat 'cam'.. 'anticipated wear and tear' is NOT a 'modification of restriction'.. its anticipated wear and tear...
Onus is on you to ensure that any vehicle you use is within your licence entitlement....
Coppa pulls you and says "This thing restricted?"
And you say "No mate, its just knackerd!"
opens two charges; first not ensurig the bike is in accordance with licence entitlements... 'cos you haven't you have done nothing to make or make sure that its power is within your entitlement, next, the 'assumption' that its probably within entitlement by dint of being knackered or half knackered is to admit to vehicle defect.. and lack of diligence on your part towards propper maintenance...
So, coppa's going to start looking at your tyres and your brakes and your bar-grips.. aren't they?
Bottom line.. IF it says in the original sales brochure that a bike makes more than 47bhp then as far as the law is concerned, it will ALWAYS make more than 47bhp, UNLESS you positively do something to change that specification, AND can provide evidence that that HAS positively reduced power to within licence limit, gain an expert opinion ie engineers report or certificate of conformity from a restrictor maker, to justify why that mod will have reduced power to licence limits. ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pdg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pdg World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Sep 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MCN Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cleggy92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cleggy92 Derestricted Danger
Joined: 18 Dec 2015 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 02:05 - 21 Dec 2015 Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike |
 |
|
| Teflon-Mike wrote: |
Coppa pulls you and says "This thing restricted?"
And you say "No mate, its just knackerd!"
|
You may be correct on the law, I'm not sure, however if that scenario were to play out, I would simply reply with "its already under the required output. No need to be restricted."
The chap selling the bike in question has a dyno reading, hopefully below the 47bhp limit. Though I doubt a dyno chart is likely to be considered proof, it would seem neither is a certificate from a professional restrictor fitter, or so the internet would indicate. The bottom line seems to be that there is no proof other than having the bike opened up for inspection, and having a dyno reading claiming anything under 47bhp would be enough to keep the police from wasting their time having the bike taken away. The way I see it, a bike capable of doing 100mph that is missing its engine, isn't a 100mph bike, its a 0mph bike. I would argue the same for horsepower.
I may have to contact the DVSA for this and get the facts from them. Seems the wording in the law will provide the answer here. They may be able to provide that. If the bike is required to be restricted I may just opt for something up toward the 90something bhp maximum stock output and have that restricted. Seems having a bike restricted from 54bhp to 47bhp when its already likely well below that anyway is going to have some unpleasant results. I may as well be back on my 125. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MCN Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 09:04 - 21 Dec 2015 Post subject: Re: A2 license restrictions for old bike |
 |
|
| cleggy92 wrote: | | Teflon-Mike wrote: |
Coppa pulls you and says "This thing restricted?"
And you say "No mate, its just knackerd!"
|
You may be correct on the law, I'm not sure, however if that scenario were to play out, I would simply reply with "its already under the required output. No need to be restricted."
The chap selling the bike in question has a dyno reading, hopefully below the 47bhp limit. Though I doubt a dyno chart is likely to be considered proof, it would seem neither is a certificate from a professional restrictor fitter, or so the internet would indicate. The bottom line seems to be that there is no proof other than having the bike opened up for inspection, and having a dyno reading claiming anything under 47bhp would be enough to keep the police from wasting their time having the bike taken away. The way I see it, a bike capable of doing 100mph that is missing its engine, isn't a 100mph bike, its a 0mph bike. I would argue the same for horsepower.
I may have to contact the DVSA for this and get the facts from them. Seems the wording in the law will provide the answer here. They may be able to provide that. If the bike is required to be restricted I may just opt for something up toward the 90something bhp maximum stock output and have that restricted. Seems having a bike restricted from 54bhp to 47bhp when its already likely well below that anyway is going to have some unpleasant results. I may as well be back on my 125. |
Read the legislation don't rely on nonsense. ____________________ Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Copycat73 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Copycat73 World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Jan 2013 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Matt B |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Matt B World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 May 2012 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 11:06 - 21 Dec 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
There's been a couple. If you stack your unrestricted racebike into a farm gate after overtaking a bunch of horrified Fred-and-Doris witnesses out for their Sunday bimble, then you're making your own luck.
An old naked 400, you'd need an epic fail to end up in the same situation. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Az |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Az World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 Apr 2013 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:05 - 21 Dec 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
I think you'll be fine, according to this site it pushes 48.7 hp at the wheel, so it's bound to have lost more than a 1.7 hp over its years. Many people ride much more powerful bikes near to the 70kw limit without restrictions or a certificate and never encounter issues in the 2 years they've been riding on their A2.
Personally, i'd keep a certificate to hand (it's really not hard to make a convincing one) and if you are to ever be pulled.... The bike's restricted, here's my certificate. But I wouldn't even bring it up if you ever get pulled, just produce a proof of restriction if you're asked (which would be your certificate) which has no legal standing anyway, it's just a promise note pretty much.
Or if you really want to be anal about it, take it to any dyno, pay £30 to have it put on a dyno and see it's power output. If it's under 47bhp happy days, it's £30 wasted but your mind's at ease and if it's above 47bhp and you really want to restrict it, buy one of these restrictor kits and fit it (clicky). If it's anything like my Bandit 600 they fit in the carb' inlet rubbers & it's not too time consuming to fit. If you're not mechanically minded, it wouldn't take a mechanic more than 1.5hr to fit imo.
Saying all that (and sorry for the Tef' like post)... the real question should be, why have you picked a Bandit 400 as your weapon of choice?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cleggy92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cleggy92 Derestricted Danger
Joined: 18 Dec 2015 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:22 - 21 Dec 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| MCN wrote: | Read the legislation don't rely on nonsense. |
I was hoping the DVSA would be able to provide said legislation. Although from what Rogerborg said, that may not be the case. I'll drop them an email all the same.
| Matt B wrote: | However, for the sake of buying a restriction kit and fitting it, is it really worth the chance? In the time you've been trying to justify your (potentially) dodgy (possibly illegal) actions on here, you could have ordered the restrictors and fitted them. Then if the percentages don't play out in your favour you have a restricted bike and no worries. |
I'm sensing some hostility here. I never once tried to justify any illegal actions. I would appreciate if you would refrain from unfounded accusations. I'm here to inquire about the possibility of an old bike losing some horsepower and thus being under the required limit for an A2 license holder. I also stated I fancy myself a Bandit 400. I don't own one, so why would I buy a restrictor now?
| Az wrote: | Or if you really want to be anal about it, take it to any dyno, pay £30 to have it put on a dyno and see it's power output. If it's under 47bhp happy days, it's £30 wasted but your mind's at ease and if it's above 47bhp and you really want to restrict it, |
The bike I'm looking at already has a dyno sheet. So I guess this could be useful since, as you say, a certificate has no real legal standing. Appreciate the input, Az!
| Az wrote: | Saying all that (and sorry for the Tef' like post)... the real question should be, why have you picked a Bandit 400 as your weapon of choice? |
It wasn't the model I was interested in per se, but a specific bike I had seen for sale. It was in my price range (no more than £1500, which is why I'm looking at older bikes) and it clearly had been looked after and looked very nice (paint job and other cosmetics). I also thought it would go under the hp limit nicely, I now realize its more complicated than I imaged. I'm now looking at some GSF 600's, which would no doubt need restricting. However they'll be better if I get my unrestricted license when I turn 24. Do you think the Bandit 400 would be a bad choice?
Thanks for all the input guys, its provided me with some clarity. Happy I didn't jump the gun and buy the bike straight away. I can be a bit of an impulse buyer but I have shown restraint!
Louis |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 16:03 - 21 Dec 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
howmanyleft.co.uk reckons there are only 17 GSF 400s left in the UK, the majority of which are on SORN. WeMoto have a fair amount of parts, but owner support is likely to be limited.
Contrast with a Bandit 600. Vastly more around, so you'll be less likely to convince yourself that a lemon is a peach. Tons of spare parts - literally tons, most of them anodised - and everybody and their dog has had one or worked on one so any problems will be shallow.
You'd have to really want a 400 to seek one out now. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 10 years, 264 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|