Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


A few questions about buying my first motorcycle

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Trackr
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 18 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:37 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: A few questions about buying my first motorcycle Reply with quote

I'm in the market for a 250cc motorcycle.

I've been looking around and found a few but the two I like the most are the Kawasaki Ninja 250/Z250 and the Hyosung GT250R/GD250R.

I guess I can't really go wrong, but there are some things I need help on.

1.) Are two cylinders better than one? I've been respectively told that both are better by different people.

2.) The difference between the Ninja 250 and the Z250 seems to be riding position. Which riding position is better? I think the Z250 feels nicer but I've been told that at high speeds it's harder to handle.

Thanks.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy_Pagin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:04 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

First things first, what licence do you hold?
Personally I would look for a 500/600cc bike, there's far more to choose from.
____________________
They're coming to take me away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa, hey-hey,
the men in white coats are coming to take me away.
Yamaha Vity -> YBR125 -> FZS600 Fazer -> FZ1-S Fazer
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:05 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A few questions about buying my first motorcycle Reply with quote

Nope: UK is an Abroadlander, we can skip the licensing questions.

Trackr wrote:
I guess I can't really go wrong

You could go wrong, you could buy the Hyosung.


Trackr wrote:
1.) Are two cylinders better than one? I've been respectively told that both are better by different people.

They're all right. A single cylinder will tend to have more low down torque and will pull better when you roll the throttle on. A twin will tend to rev higher and make more power once you've got the engine spinning fast.

Which one you prefer is just that: a matter of preference. You'll want to try them both and see which one tickles your fancy.




Trackr wrote:
I think the Z250 feels nicer but I've been told that at high speeds it's harder to handle.

You'll get more wind blast on your chest and possibly head with a naked, upright bike, and that can get tiring. However, add-on screens are available if that's an issue. I've fitted a screen, or added a bigger screen to all my bikes.

The actual position is again a subjective decision. I don't like the sportsbike crouch, others love it for reasons that escape me.

The tl;dr version is that there's no right or wrong answer (except the Hyosungs). If you get a bike and enjoy it, then it was the right choice for you.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Trackr
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 18 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:54 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A few questions about buying my first motorcycle Reply with quote

Andy_Pagin wrote:
First things first, what licence do you hold?
Personally I would look for a 500/600cc bike, there's far more to choose from.


Don't live in the US/UK. My license allows me a motorcycle with up-to 47 HP.

In that category, I can get a 250/300 or a gimped 500/650 for twice the price.

Doesn't seem worth it, IMHO. I'll wait a year and get the highest license.

Rogerborg wrote:
Nope: UK is an Abroadlander, we can skip the licensing questions.


Googled it, but no idea what this means.

Rogerborg wrote:

They're all right. A single cylinder will tend to have more low down torque and will pull better when you roll the throttle on. A twin will tend to rev higher and make more power once you've got the engine spinning fast.

Which one you prefer is just that: a matter of preference. You'll want to try them both and see which one tickles your fancy.


I see. So, a single-cylinder will require less force to operate, thus granting a quicker torque, while the dual-cylinder will take more force/time but will eventually get you to higher speeds.

Judging by that, I'd say the latter seems more beneficial. I don't see why getting to 100KM/h in 'X' seconds is more important than having a superior maximum speed, especially when handling dangerous evasions by overtaking vehicle drivers.

I live in Israel and people here drive like fucking maniacs.

This includes motorcycle riders too, btw. I was doing 140KM/h and got overtaken from both sides by motorcycles doing at least 180KM/h on an intercity highway.

Rogerborg wrote:
You'll get more wind blast on your chest and possibly head with a naked, upright bike, and that can get tiring. However, add-on screens are available if that's an issue. I've fitted a screen, or added a bigger screen to all my bikes.

The actual position is again a subjective decision. I don't like the sportsbike crouch, others love it for reasons that escape me.


Well, on a motorcycle you're still crouching significantly compared to a scooter, so you're about halfway there.

The way I see it:

Electric Bike/Scooter - Sitting upright.
Regular Bike/Motorcycle - Half crouching.
Road Bike/Sportsbike - Full crouching.

Why do people prefer the full crouch? My guess was that it just has to make a huge difference at speeds above 140 KM/h.

I mean, if you could just install a screen to prevent all backlash, I really don't see why anyone would ride full crouch.

Then again.. that's what I said before I got my road bike. Couldn't understand how anybody would want to NOT sit upright.

I'm gonna go try another half-crouch bike (the Suzuki GW250) in a few hours and I'll see how it feels at top speeds.

Rogerborg wrote:

You could go wrong, you could buy the Hyosung.

If you get a bike and enjoy it, then it was the right choice for you.


Mhm. But by your logic, if I enjoy the Hyosung then it ISN'T the wrong choice.

I would appreciate it if you explained why you dislike them so much. Seemed better than Suzuki to me.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

RedPanda
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 07 Oct 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:01 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

CBR250?

https://www.honda.co.jp/news/2011/image/cbr250r_2110315b.jpg
____________________
CBF125 (2013) -> CBR600F (2001) -> 'Ninja' 300 (2014)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Doovy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:38 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A few questions about buying my first motorcycle Reply with quote

Trackr wrote:
I live in Israel and people here drive like fucking maniacs.


Seconded Laughing
____________________
Yamaha RXS 100 > Honda CD 250 > Honda Hornet 600 > Honda CBR 600RR > Yamaha RXS 100 > Kawasaki ZX6R J2 > Yamaha FZ1
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:39 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A few questions about buying my first motorcycle Reply with quote

Trackr wrote:
I would appreciate it if you explained why you dislike [Hyosungs] so much.

I'm petty and spiteful and hold a grudge.

It depends on the local dealers and parts supply. If you can get someone to work on them, and if parts aren't a problem then they're probably no worse than any other modern budget bike.

Be clear that hearing "Parts won't be a problem!" from a dealer trying to sell you a bike does not mean that parts won't be a problem.

I'd check out insurance and depreciation... and then I'd probably buy a Honda CB500 variant.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Alpineandy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:07 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A few questions about buying my first motorcycle Reply with quote

Trackr wrote:
The way I see it:

Electric Bike/Scooter - Sitting upright.
Regular Bike/Motorcycle - Half crouching.
Road Bike/Sportsbike - Full crouching.


A lot of 'adventure/dual sport' bikes like BMW GS/Honda Transalp/Kawa KLE500 etc are a much more upright position.

Also it can be a benefit to sit higher so that you have a better view of the road / other road users and stand a better chance of avoiding incidents.

This may help you; https://cycle-ergo.com/

As for a 250cc. It's a really good size for off-road style bikes but a 500/650cc bike is usually much more stable/comfortable for a road bike, especially at speed.

But If 250cc is the maximum you have a licence for then with those lemons you make lemonade.
____________________
The above comment isn't necessarily the truth and anyone that says it is, is only correct if it's the truth or they're bigger than me.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nomad Z
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 25 Oct 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:33 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Re: A few questions about buying my first motorcycle Reply with quote

Trackr wrote:

Rogerborg wrote:

They're all right. A single cylinder will tend to have more low down torque and will pull better when you roll the throttle on. A twin will tend to rev higher and make more power once you've got the engine spinning fast.

Which one you prefer is just that: a matter of preference. You'll want to try them both and see which one tickles your fancy.


I see. So, a single-cylinder will require less force to operate, thus granting a quicker torque, while the dual-cylinder will take more force/time but will eventually get you to higher speeds.


Not sure you've got that quite right. A single has its peak torque at lower revs, meaning it will pick up speed better than a twin if you gradually open the throttle without changing down a gear or two. In a twin, if you change down, you can still access the peak torque quickly and then open the throttle to accelerate. Whether one accelerates more than the other is down to the specific design and capability of each.


Quote:
Judging by that, I'd say the latter seems more beneficial. I don't see why getting to 100KM/h in 'X' seconds is more important than having a superior maximum speed, especially when handling dangerous evasions by overtaking vehicle drivers.


Its a blend of both acceleration and speed. To consider hypothetical extremes... For overtaking, a bike with a high top speed isn't much good if it accelerates like a truck, and one that accelerates to a lower top speed in 0.5 seconds is also not much use if it can't reach a higher speed than the traffic it's being asked to pass. Any bike around 47bhp should have enough acceleration and top speed to be able to overtake most traffic. The twin/single thing is more about how you want the power to become available.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:54 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like things that accelerate like a truck though! Laughing

There's nothing better than when you have a big capacity and powerful Diesel engine in an empty large vehicle, and then put it into top gear at 30-40mph and floor it, it's like a big hand is constantly pushing you hard but steadily faster all the way through the power band.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:01 - 22 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh and to OP if a 250cc is forced upon you by some local licensing regulations, then your going to be in trouble if sitting at 140kmh is dangerous and vulnerable, with most bikes/cars going past in any lane they like at 180kmh.

Id want more than 50bhp for such riding situations. A well thrashed CB500 or similar would do the job fine, but more poke still for getting out of the 140kmh or 180kmh lanes of madness would always be welcome.

If you overshoot too far you'll end up with a bike over 80-100bhp, and then it'll just be because you want it, don't care and or willy waving, which are relevant reasons for owning a bike just so long as you don't dress it up by saying I need that extra 50bhp just to be on the safe side etc.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 263 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.08 Sec - Server Load: 0.74 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 79.17 Kb