|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Sun Wukong |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Sun Wukong World Chat Champion

Joined: 02 Nov 2014 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 15:01 - 02 Jan 2016 Post subject: Global issue... Animal agriculture and "cowspiracy" |
 |
|
So, much like Blackfish, a film has come out stating the elephant in the room of global warming is clearly animal farming.
https://www.cowspiracy.com/facts/
Basically says the only way forward is to go vegan. Dairy is even worse for the environment, including the amount of feed crops and water use... leaving aside the methane, it is still a big drain.
I was rapidly anti-vegetarian when younger, but I am also not too arsed about recycling. It seems to cause more issues/waste, and puritanism is bullshit so disliked holier than thou lettuce botherers.
But got to say, quitting meat is such a small step to helping the environment. So is not having children. ____________________ Top cat
"Hard times lead to hard people. Hard people lead to good times. Good times lead to weak people. Weak people lead to hard times." Smegballs
"Oh and STE balloons would be one of the nicer things we would receive at the office, the amount of dog turd in jiffy bags is not funny." Jsmith86 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| CaNsA |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 CaNsA Super Spammer

Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob Fzs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob Fzs World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Oct 2015 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| doggone |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 doggone World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 May 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| CaNsA |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 CaNsA Super Spammer

Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ThoughtContro... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ThoughtContro... World Chat Champion

Joined: 14 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Skudd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Skudd Super Spammer

Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Jmoan |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Jmoan Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 18 Nov 2015 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Tracey Suntan-King |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Tracey Suntan-King World Chat Champion

Joined: 10 Nov 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Polarbear |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Polarbear Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| RhynoCZ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 RhynoCZ Super Spammer

Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 01:44 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: Re: Global issue... Animal agriculture and "cowspiracy& |
 |
|
| Sun Wukong wrote: | ...a film has come out stating the elephant in the room of global warming is clearly animal farming... |
I have heard about this before (about 10 years or so ago), it does make sense. But then, does it really? We know so little about this planet, that people only guess, what the cause of the warming could possibly be.
For each study that says what the problem is, there is another counter-study, that says otherwise. Which only means, all this is just another wild guess. Just for the fun of it, look at what our ancestors thought about things and problems of their time.  ____________________ '87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 12:14 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: Re: Global issue... Animal agriculture and "cowspiracy& |
 |
|
| RhynoCZ wrote: | | Sun Wukong wrote: | ...a film has come out stating the elephant in the room of global warming is clearly animal farming... |
I have heard about this before (about 10 years or so ago), it does make sense. But then, does it really? We know so little about this planet, that people only guess, what the cause of the warming could possibly be.
For each study that says what the problem is, there is another counter-study, that says otherwise. Which only means, all this is just another wild guess. Just for the fun of it, look at what our ancestors thought about things and problems of their time.  |
Are you sure there's a counterstudy for everything? Or does it just seem that way because when studies come out there are always amateurs chiming in with why they disagree with it.
Greenhouse gas molecules have resonance frequencies similar to that of visible light, or infrared. More greenhouse gas means more molecules resonating when hit by the EM waves causing heat, which means energy from the EM waves is transferred to the molecules instead of escaping into space. So heat stays in the atmosphere.
The albedo of an object is it's reflection coefficient, relating the amount of energy it takes in, to the amount of energy it radiates back out. An albedo of 1 means it is fully reflective and takes in no energy.
The albedo of earth is currently around 0.35. Greenhouse gases are lowering it. (Note the rising trend of the blue 'albedo' line actually follows a negative gradient as the scale on the right is reversed)
https://www.seafriends.org.nz/issues/global/global18.gif
The reduction in albedo is not just caused by greenhouse gases retaining the heat, but also by things like the melting of polar ice caps. The albedo of snow is 0.7. Get rid of the snow and you're left with a far less reflective material underneath.
Theory predicts these things and now it's happening. It bugs me when people outright don't trust science, as if the quest for human progress and advancement has some secret ulterior motive that only qualified scientists are aware of. The funny thing is it's often the science nay-sayers who are also the ones most likely to shun conspiracy theories, yet here we are with people claiming global warming is some kind of falsehood or conspiracy... for the gain of whom? The entire population of evil doctors and professors all in their underground society of secret collusion?
EDIT: And cows make a lot of greenhouse gas. A lot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kawasaki Jimbo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kawasaki Jimbo World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 Oct 2015 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:43 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
There's a chap called Allan Savory who claims that, "Only livestock can reverse desertification," meaning properly managed grazing by wild and/or domesticated animals.
| Quote: | As late as 1969, he was advocating culling large populations of wild animals such as elephants, when they appeared to be destroying their habitat. His research, validated by a committee of scientists, led to the government culling of 40,000 elephants in following years but he later concluded the culling did not reverse the degradation of the land, calling that decision "the saddest and greatest blunder of my life." This blunder, brought about by interpreting research data to fit the prevailing world-view that too many animals causes overgrazing and overbrowsing, led to Savory becoming determined to solve the problem. This was eventually to lead to the development of the holistic framework for decision-making and to holistic planned grazing |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Savory
For me the moot point in the climate-change debate is whether it is man-made or not.[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 13:24 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Kawasaki Jimbo wrote: | There's a chap called Allan Savory who claims that, "Only livestock can reverse desertification," meaning properly managed grazing by wild and/or domesticated animals.
| Quote: | As late as 1969, he was advocating culling large populations of wild animals such as elephants, when they appeared to be destroying their habitat. His research, validated by a committee of scientists, led to the government culling of 40,000 elephants in following years but he later concluded the culling did not reverse the degradation of the land, calling that decision "the saddest and greatest blunder of my life." This blunder, brought about by interpreting research data to fit the prevailing world-view that too many animals causes overgrazing and overbrowsing, led to Savory becoming determined to solve the problem. This was eventually to lead to the development of the holistic framework for decision-making and to holistic planned grazing |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Savory
For me the moot point in the climate-change debate is whether it is man-made or not.[/b] |
Quite interesting. I guess the difference is that there isn't much grazing going on in factory farms!
I also agree it's slightly moot as to whether it's man-made. There are certainly a lot of man-made factors going into it, but the question is whether the whole thing is still going to end up cyclic anyway. I wonder how much methane dinosaurs produced?
Although on the other hand, relating to man-made influence, I guess the big issue actually is that global warming is accelerating at an unnatural rate, because of things that just weren't happening before, namely the burning of fossil fuels and mass production of livestock.
The world has been hotter at times, but ecosystems had chance to adapt. Currently the most overt example we seem to have is dying coral reefs. I'm sure there'll be more to come at some point. The big one is the Taiga region in Sibera, with all the methane naturally locked under the permafrost. When that melts it'll be pretty major, I'm guessing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob Fzs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob Fzs World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Oct 2015 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| smegballs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 smegballs World Chat Champion
Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 13:47 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
Personally I think money would be better be spent adapting to climate change, rather than trying to fight it, and lowering pollution.
Bearing in mind there has been a cyclical ice-age pattern in just the last few million years (which geologically speaking is the blink of an eye) that's a pretty big climate change, long before humans even had metals. Let alone the long term climate change over hundreds of millions of years when earth was way hotter and had a very different atmospheric composition.
I remember reading an article a few years back which went on about making a commitment to not "allow" the global temperature to rise by more than two degrees. Allow!? What are we going to do? Prosecute the planet for non-compliance? It just goes to show the ridiculous mindset that we have about ruling the roost here on earth. The climate changed before we were here, it will change after we are gone too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pepperami |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pepperami Super Spammer

Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Robby |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robby Dirty Old Man

Joined: 16 May 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:10 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
I think this problem may end up being sorted by economics, with a little politics thrown in.
US agriculture relies on growers being able to sell staples - mostly corn - at well below the cost of production, largely due to massive federal subsidies but also relying on a few other things, like illegal migrant labour from Mexico earning a pittance.
This cheap corn enables massive feedlot farms producing dirt-cheap meat. This means people can consume large amounts of low quality meat.
It isn't a sustainable model. Topsoil doesn't regenerate that fast, crops are susceptible to blight, animals are susceptible to infection and so rely on an awful lot of antibiotics. The whole system relies on a small number of very large farms, which represent single points of failure.
The fix, which would be a slower cultural shift, is for people to eat smaller amounts of higher quality meat. This is starting to happen with people buying decent organic food, but the shift is slow.
One of the things that looks like a ray of hope, particularly here in the UK, is old-fashioned organic, free range meat. Your traditional idea of a small farm, green fields, animals eating grass, selling direct to a local butcher with a local slaughterhouse. More expensive, but worth it. Properly sustainable, rotating the fields through different uses.
In time, things will balance out. The EU will probably keep away from really intensive farming, we already produce too much. China and India can look at the US model and see how it works long term. The US will have to change at some point. Meanwhile I'll keep buying free-range pork, beef and chicken from a farm I like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ThoughtContro... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ThoughtContro... World Chat Champion

Joined: 14 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:20 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Robby wrote: | The fix, which would be a slower cultural shift, is for people to eat smaller amounts of higher quality meat. This is starting to happen with people buying decent organic food, but the shift is slow.
One of the things that looks like a ray of hope, particularly here in the UK, is old-fashioned organic, free range meat. Your traditional idea of a small farm, green fields, animals eating grass, selling direct to a local butcher with a local slaughterhouse. More expensive, but worth it. |
Well that sounds nice, but we're in the 21st century. The middle class is in decline as are well paying jobs. Most of the populace will be subsisting on or just above minimum wage. This means the meat intake of the majority of the masses will be whatever "meat" is cheapest to suit this budget. Whether it's made from Romanian donkeys, recycled refugees and runaway kids or the eyelids and noses from disposed dead cats that's just the way it will turn out. As long as the packaging looks pretty and there's enough fillers, textures and artificial flavourings to make it taste like what it's not, then the unwashed public will turn a blind eye and eat it. ____________________ Prize cunt
--
"In a world of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 19:12 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: Re: Global issue... Animal agriculture and "cowspiracy& |
 |
|
| Rob Fzs wrote: | | Lord Percy wrote: |
EDIT: And cows make a lot of greenhouse gas. A lot. |
You would think if these scientists are really interested in saving the world, or whatever they think telling us about climate change is going to do, they would be finding ways to harvest the gas cattle make to power the country....
or they could carry on making studies that say cows are bad, knowing they can carry on milking the cash cow, while little gets done about it to change |
See this is the kind of staunch anti-science talk I'm on about.
Do you really think it hasn't been considered? And do you really think climate researchers are on some kind of agenda to simply make money off the back of this? People don't get jobs 'because the earth is getting warmer', they get jobs because it's an interesting and good thing to monitor the global climate. People aren't specially paid to do studies that prove global warming, they're paid to analyse global data and trends, regardless. (Ok there are some rogue organisations out there, but the majority of evidence still tends to swing in one direction, and I don't think that's entirely going to be through institutional bias).
If you want to blame anyone for climate change being so big on the agenda, blame journalists for broadcasting the data. They're the ones who make the money, they spin it into a big thing and make a narrative to sell more papers. The scientists carry on regardless. No research institution will have its funding pulled simply because climate change is proven wrong, because the motive isn't to look for something, it's to monitor things and plot trends. That's what 'doing science' is.
And you can't blame 'science' for the lack of innovation over methane harvesting. There's a huge, complex network of people, groups and organisations involved. Just because one group sees a trend in global climate patterns, it doesn't render their results moot if another group haven't come up with a solution to cow farts yet.
Also:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/17/article-0-1D29733200000578-945_634x421.jpg
https://a.fastcompany.net/multisite_files/fastcompany/imagecache/slideshow_large/slideshow/2014/04/3028933-slide-s-methane-01.jpg
https://h.fastcompany.net/multisite_files/fastcompany/imagecache/inline-large/inline/2014/04/3028933-inline-s-methane-03.jpg
https://www.independent.ie/migration_catalog/article25187606.ece/ALTERNATES/h342/Cow_I |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob Fzs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob Fzs World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Oct 2015 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 19:30 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: Re: Global issue... Animal agriculture and "cowspiracy& |
 |
|
| Lord Percy wrote: |
See this is the kind of staunch anti-science talk I'm on about.
Do you really think it hasn't been considered? And do you really think climate researchers are on some kind of agenda to simply make money off the back of this? People don't get jobs 'because the earth is getting warmer', they get jobs because it's an interesting and good thing to monitor the global climate. People aren't specially paid to do studies that prove global warming, they're paid to analyse global data and trends, regardless. (Ok there are some rogue organisations out there, but the majority of evidence still tends to swing in one direction, and I don't think that's entirely going to be through institutional bias).
If you want to blame anyone for climate change being so big on the agenda, blame journalists for broadcasting the data. They're the ones who make the money, they spin it into a big thing and make a narrative to sell more papers. The scientists carry on regardless. No research institution will have its funding pulled simply because climate change is proven wrong, because the motive isn't to look for something, it's to monitor things and plot trends. That's what 'doing science' is.
And you can't blame 'science' for the lack of innovation over methane harvesting. There's a huge, complex network of people, groups and organisations involved. Just because one group sees a trend in global climate patterns, it doesn't render their results moot if another group haven't come up with a solution to cow farts yet.
Also:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/17/article-0-1D29733200000578-945_634x421.jpg
https://a.fastcompany.net/multisite_files/fastcompany/imagecache/slideshow_large/slideshow/2014/04/3028933-slide-s-methane-01.jpg
https://h.fastcompany.net/multisite_files/fastcompany/imagecache/inline-large/inline/2014/04/3028933-inline-s-methane-03.jpg
https://www.independent.ie/migration_catalog/article25187606.ece/ALTERNATES/h342/Cow_I |
Strawman fallacy, you're assuming i have not thought about all these things, my post was to cowspiracy and the vegan agenda as that is what the op is about.
instead of using it as a stick to blame farmers, because that is all i hear, nothing to do with helping farmers try and adapt to capturing these gasses, which will cost time and money and ultimately benefit the planet., you need to chill bruh ____________________ '00 Aprilia RS50 > '92 Honda CG > '99 Yamaha Fazer > '91 Yamaha RXS > '79 Suzuki X5 > 01' Honda Cg > 07' Honda Cg > 82' Kawasaki Z200 > suzuki gsxr 400 gk73a > honda vfr 400 NC30> Yamaha RD350 YPVS F2 > Kawasaki ZZR 600 D1 > Yamaha TZR 250 2MA >Suzuki TL1000R > Yamaha TDR250 > Honda 929 blade > Suzuki SV1000 > Honda H100
Mod 2 Passed 09/06/2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Sun Wukong |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Sun Wukong World Chat Champion

Joined: 02 Nov 2014 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 19:41 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
It's interesting to me because the day before watching that documentary, I was clear that I would return to farming in the next year... even if just for a short stint.
And part of the justification is that there will always be a meat industry.
Granted, where I would be going to farm really cannot be used for crops, but the water use would still be high in borderline desert areas.
It adds all kinds of other questions;
Dairy and egg farming are bad, mkay. But what if I have a pet goat, whom I milk. And some pet ducks, who chuck out some eggs now and then.
And, what if I shoot the odd kangaroo and eat it. They are "wild" but also a pest and a drain. Can I do that?
Can I feast on the irritating fluffy bastards with impunity, so long as I don't support the meat industry... whilst working in the meat industry.
Is it ok as long as it is not intensive meat farming in indoor feedlots, but sustainable pleasant stuff.
The dilemma.
 ____________________ Top cat
"Hard times lead to hard people. Hard people lead to good times. Good times lead to weak people. Weak people lead to hard times." Smegballs
"Oh and STE balloons would be one of the nicer things we would receive at the office, the amount of dog turd in jiffy bags is not funny." Jsmith86 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob Fzs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob Fzs World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Oct 2015 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 19:51 - 03 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Sun Wukong wrote: | It's interesting to me because the day before watching that documentary, I was clear that I would return to farming in the next year... even if just for a short stint.
And part of the justification is that there will always be a meat industry.
Granted, where I would be going to farm really cannot be used for crops, but the water use would still be high in borderline desert areas.
It adds all kinds of other questions;
Dairy and egg farming are bad, mkay. But what if I have a pet goat, whom I milk. And some pet ducks, who chuck out some eggs now and then.
And, what if I shoot the odd kangaroo and eat it. They are "wild" but also a pest and a drain. Can I do that?
Can I feast on the irritating fluffy bastards with impunity, so long as I don't support the meat industry... whilst working in the meat industry.
Is it ok as long as it is not intensive meat farming in indoor feedlots, but sustainable pleasant stuff.
The dilemma.
 |
I'll assume you're in britain, and if so, buy food with the red tractor on, then you at least know its not been reared in a complete crap hole
Organic makes me laugh though, recently speaking to an organic farmer, they're not really fully organic, they just use less chemicals than conventional, unless you grow it yourself, you never really know what it's got in it. ____________________ '00 Aprilia RS50 > '92 Honda CG > '99 Yamaha Fazer > '91 Yamaha RXS > '79 Suzuki X5 > 01' Honda Cg > 07' Honda Cg > 82' Kawasaki Z200 > suzuki gsxr 400 gk73a > honda vfr 400 NC30> Yamaha RD350 YPVS F2 > Kawasaki ZZR 600 D1 > Yamaha TZR 250 2MA >Suzuki TL1000R > Yamaha TDR250 > Honda 929 blade > Suzuki SV1000 > Honda H100
Mod 2 Passed 09/06/2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 10 years, 293 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|