|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 12:51 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: Good News for bikers & car drivers in Edinburgh ! |
 |
|
The good people of Edinburgh have rejected the City's Councils proposal to bring in congestion charging by a 3 to 1 majority !!! I bet the Londoners must be kicking themselves this morning for not doing the same when it was proposed
Here's the news about it;
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4287145.stm |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ProXimaCore |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ProXimaCore Dougal

Joined: 01 May 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 12:56 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
I thought bikers were getting in toll free if the congestion charging went ahead. I was kind of hoping it would have went ahead. Less cars on the road would be much better for the days I take the bike to work. ____________________ Honda NSR125R -> Suzuki GSXR400R GK76a -> Kawasaki ZX636 B1H -> Honda CBR400RR NC29 -> Nothing  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 13:01 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Glad at least one city has seen through this kind of scheme. Bit surprised that a city that is run by as big a bunch of anti car people around did not manage to skew the poll to produce the results they wanted.
Would not bet on motorcycles staying exempt from the charge. Main purpose of the London one is to provide money to pay for the buses and tube, and motorcyclists cash is as good as car drivers cash.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:22 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Edinburgh council are a bunch of bloody loonys anyway. They always come up with some hair brained scheme which isn't properly thought out.
This was a good example in that there were no plans to upgrade the public transport infrastructure prior to bringing in the conjestion charging meaning that the people who are driving into the centre of Edinburgh would still have no option other than to do so. The only difference it would make is that the drivers would now be more pissed off as they are once again shelling out to Edinburgh city council in addition to the parking charges and parking fines.
You can absolutley count on the fact that any money that would have been generated from such a scheme would have been frittered away on some pie in the sky plan. A bit like the 'Monorail' episode in the Simpsons.
In my oppinion, the public transport in Edinburgh is responsible for a lot of the conjestion. Look at any line of traffic in the city centre and you will find an obsolete, thirty year old, smoke belching double decker (or three in a row, all with four people in them) at the front of it. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Zoffo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Zoffo Brolly Dolly

Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 13:47 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Don't give Edinburgh any more money. Last time the found a 50p piece the built Glasgow with it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Robin |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robin Scooby Slapper

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:28 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Not too sure about wether this is a good or a bad thing.
On one hand I disagree with toll roads/charging on any public highway, but.......................
.............In Durham where they have introduced a toll it has cut down traffic, on one of the busiest streets which was/is virtually pedestrian anyway, by 70%. It is now a lot nicer and safer to go shopping there. And a good bit of money has been spent on improving public transport on that section to cater for those who need to go there.
.............In London where PTWs are exempt bike usage has increased and at the same time the number of bike accidents has decreased. Surely less cars=less blind tw@ts to injure bike riders.
Thanks to constant lobbying of Red Ken by the likes of MAG/BMF it would be a major publicity mistake to even think about charging bikes. Bikes do not cause congestion, hence you can not include them in a congestion charge  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| instigator |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 instigator Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Oct 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:46 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Here's the reaction to the 'No' vote to congestion charging from the Politicians;
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4287039.stm
This is one of the proposals put forward by the 'Yes' campaigners.
Better for tourists. Tourists don’t come to Edinburgh to be polluted; many do come to see a World Heritage Site that is unfortunately over-run with cars. Tourists will not have to pay the charge if they hire a car, and if they use public transport they too will gain the benefits of the investment programme.
So, you can guess who has been putting money into the Labour Party's election funds!
This was the results of the final count; https://www.transport-edinburgh.org.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cc123 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cc123 Geez a joab?

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:05 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
I used to work in Edinburgh, had to travel from the south city bypass all the way over to Granton. Took me the best part of 30-40 to travel a few miles.
I'd rather wait that time than pay £2 everyday to go to work. I can see the point of the charges but people are not going to pay that kind of money. Over the whole year it's going to add up. And I can't see companies paying for there employee's congestions taxes just to see them make there work surely? ____________________ Old bikes >>> https://www.bikepics.com/members/cc123/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 15:17 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
I find it quite easy getting into Granton when travelling from West as I have relatives in that area. Have you tried the new shopping mall on the front where the Royal Yacht is docked? Plenty of Scottish themed gift shops plus a Chinese pottery stand, etc, but no actual electrical shop ie Dixons to be seen, except there is a quite a few vacant lots inside. There is a huge bar/resteraunt area inside and I do mean huge! It costs £9 to walk onboard the Yacht, but you can view it instead from the shopping Mall's inside upper balcony where a shop's cafeteria is located.
Don't know if you know this, but it's free to park your car/bike in the adjacent carpark (that might be only on weekends if I am correct?) - the bike space (for about 8 bikes in total) is just as you enter as the ramp goes up ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cc123 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cc123 Geez a joab?

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:25 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
That will be Ocean Terminal then??
Been a few times but there really isn't anything of interest in there. Was at one of the bars up the top but it was a small fortune for a drink.
Getting to Granton from the west at 7:30am is a different story though. Thank god I don't work in Edinburgh anymore. It's the most depressing place on the planet! ____________________ Old bikes >>> https://www.bikepics.com/members/cc123/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 15:27 - 22 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Yep, that's the one and it's really only good for one visit just as interesting as going to Oban !  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mchaggis |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mchaggis World Chat Champion

Joined: 10 May 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 11:34 - 24 Feb 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Well, it won't be too long before they start introducing toll roads all over the place/ converting existing roads which we pay for with road tax into toll roads.
Hence, we'll still pay our road tax and everything we used to, but be expected to pay extra to use any major roads. Typical. This government don't know what democracy is. Neither does this country. All democracy seems to mean is that we give them a mandate to ru(i)n the country for the next five years.
None of this by the people, for the people crap, that'd be far to fair, and we couldn't help out our mates who've donated a little to our kitty...  ____________________ I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 01:59 - 02 Mar 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Somewhat related, the real reasons for the rise of the London congestion charge have surfaced:-
https://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/londonnews/articles/16949092?version=1
| This Is London wrote: |
Motorists misled over C-charge extension
By David Williams Motoring Editor, Evening Standard
1 March 2005
Transport chiefs were today accused of misleading motorists over the congestion charge increase.
In July, the charge will rise from £5 to £8, and in early 2007 the scheme will move westwards under Transport for London proposals. TfL said the rise was to deter motorists from entering the zone and to stop the charge being "devalued".
But documents seen by the Standard suggest the real reason for the hike is to ensure the scheme does not plunge into the red under the burden of expanding into Kensington and Chelsea.
Transport for London's Preliminary Consultation Draft says: "Comparing the costs and benefits of a western extension, the net effect of a £5 and £8 extension over 10 years of operation can be calculated." It says a £5 charge would be "unlikely to cover the costs".
But an £8 charge would "broadly cover the resources it would consume" - it could even generate £210 million over 10 years under "favourable" conditions. The document says a £5 charge could make £20 million over 10 years but only if large numbers of motorists carry on paying to drive in - and if operating costs are lower than expected. Otherwise there could be "an overall financial loss", the document warns.
If the charge's finishing time is cut back to 6pm from 6.30pm as demanded by businesses, loss of benefits could be even greater, totalling £40 million to £80 million over 10 years.
In November Mayor Ken Livingstone announced he was going to increase the charge to ?8, after previously indicating it would rise to ?6. When challenged by LBC radio phonein host Nick Ferrari the following month, the Mayor said simply: "I changed my mind." Today the RAC Foundation, and Tories and Liberal Democrats on the London Assembly, attacked the ?3 hike.
"When congestion charging was launched the mayor said it was about cutting congestion - not raising money," said RAC Foundation executive director, Edmund King. "Now
TfL's own document shows the main reason for boosting the charge is not - as TfL says - to cut traffic further but simply to ensure the western extension can go ahead."
Angie Bray, Tory transport spokeswoman on the Assembly, said: "The increase from £5 to £8 is not just about extra revenue or less congestion but survival of the scheme." Lynne Featherstone, Lib-Dem chairwoman of the Assembly's transport committee, said: "This new information blows a massive hole in the Mayor's argument as to why the congestion charge should increase from £5 to £8. It is time for the Mayor to come clean with Londoners about his reasons for putting up the charge."
In April last year, before the proposed £8 charge was revealed, TfL admitted there could be a ?5 million loss if not enough drivers paid to enter the expanded zone and if operating costs were at the top end of predictions.
Today TfL denied the rise to £8 was connected with profits or making the extension viable. A spokesman said: "TfL and the Mayor have made very clear the basis on which any increase from £5 to £8 is being suggested. Profitability of the proposed western extension is not the issue at hand."
In a BBC London interview this week Mr Livingstone said he "very much hoped" to introduce the congestion charge extension, regardless of public opposition. "It's good for them," he said. "It will have a further big reduction in congestion, pollution and accidents, and a further improvement in reliability of buses."
|
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 21 years, 239 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|