Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


USD vs RWU.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

mistergixer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:48 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: USD vs RWU. Reply with quote

Anyone know the relative merits and demerits of them?
Are USD forks superior to RWU, or is it just a fashion thing?
____________________
Space Monkey #7
Don Eladio is dead. His capos are dead. You have no one left to fight for. Fill your pockets and leave in peace. Or fight me and die!
Mistergixer's videos on YouTube
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Gazdaman
I did a trackday!!!



Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:50 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Up side down and right way up for people wondering what the hell he's on about. And he means forks.

Personally I think USD forks look better, but AFAIK it's a fashion thing.

Gaz
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

mrchips
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:52 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure, seems USD are just for looks. And they do look well.
____________________
Northern Irish? www.nibikers.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mungel
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:56 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't it something to do with less unsprung weight? Thinking
____________________
Mungel
ZZR600 (dead) - ZX9R (sold) - FZ1S
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mchaggis
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:05 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

USD forks have less unsprung weight, so you can get better suspension performance, with less mass to wang up and down on the springs. They've plenty of bling factor, but are unneccesary on most machines. A bit like radial brakes.
____________________
I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mr.z
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:07 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, afaik its unsprung weight, unsprung weight makes a far biger difference to handleing than loping off sub frames e.t.c. might give a better ride as well...

For the difference it makes for everyday rideing though.. i prefer the propper way up, all that shiney gear getting covered in road shat and being hit by the tar covered gravel that councils seem to think is "resurfaceing"

Main reason road bikes has it is tart factor, much like radial brakes, it will knock off .5 seconds off your lap time but make fark all difference on the road (where you can't use 50% of the brakeing on a modern bike...)

/Beaten to it, must type faster..
____________________
>RidingSkills<->Tech Tips<->MyBikes<
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:03 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Less unsprung weight and they are stiffer.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DukeRed
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:51 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could be talking crap but doesn't it make it easier to sort out the yokes when there misaligned or something like that. Overheard it from a couple of bikers at the Ball so Confused
____________________
Enjoy Life There's Plenty of Time to be Dead
https://www.janoner.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

VFR400UK
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:55 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Makes it a twat to change the fork seals! Mad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

gavin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:12 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

RWU forks have (relatively) short ally lowers and longer chromed steel uppers, whereras USD's have long ally uppers and short chromed steel lowers. the steel parts have less wall thickness and diameter but being longer and having to support the damping and springing internals, they are heavier than ally uppers (USD forks)

on balance, theres little difference in weight, if anything, the unsprung parts of USD's are slightly heavier than the the same dia unsprung parts of RWU forks.

ALL forks flex at the bottom yoke under braking, so having thicker, bigger diameter tubes at this point ( ie USD forks) drastically reduces flex.

its not about unsprung weight, its about stiffness.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:11 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a point of interest.....ok maybe not but I will say it anyway. When my mate got a RD350 YPVS(RWU) his old man who used to race bikes in the 50's thought it had upside down forks!! Laughing So I reckon its a fashion thing
Vin
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DynaMight
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:16 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been told before on a 125cc forum that USD forks make a sportsbike.... Rolling Eyes
____________________
My bikes are at https://www.bikepics.com/members/dynamight/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:47 - 02 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vin wrote:
As a point of interest.....ok maybe not but I will say it anyway. When my mate got a RD350 YPVS(RWU) his old man who used to race bikes in the 50's thought it had upside down forks!! Laughing So I reckon its a fashion thing
Vin


Think on that Norton they are conventional forks with an outer cover at the top.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:09 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Think on that Norton they are conventional forks with an outer cover at the top.

All the best

Keith

Which means they are and I made a mistake Embarassed .. but the story still stands.
Vin
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Klause
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:21 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I've had both and for me USD's are alot better. Really, really hard to bottom out.
____________________
Current bikes: 1960 Triumph 5ta x2, TTR600RE, KTM200EXC, Cagiva Elephant 900ie.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

2Smoke
Crazy Courier



Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:15 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Klause wrote:
Well I've had both and for me USD's are alot better. Really, really hard to bottom out.


Thats nothing to do with the style of the forks more to do with the springs/oil/damper Wink
____________________
Currently in the stable.. '89 TDR250, 86 NSR250 '79 350LC, '79 DT175MX, 82, Pasola, '98 R1, '95 Speed Triple.. all of them total sheds..
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:17 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Klause wrote:
Well I've had both and for me USD's are alot better. Really, really hard to bottom out.


I'd be amazed if the average person would ever notice the difference, especially riding on the road. More likely the setup as USD forks will not be any easier/harder to bottom out than traditional forks.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Klause
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:55 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I've had them both and I notice the difference. Why do so many people go "blah blah they don't make any difference" to all the new things that are starting to appear on bikes, sounds like your getting old!
____________________
Current bikes: 1960 Triumph 5ta x2, TTR600RE, KTM200EXC, Cagiva Elephant 900ie.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:06 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Klause wrote:
Well I've had them both and I notice the difference. Why do so many people go "blah blah they don't make any difference" to all the new things that are starting to appear on bikes, sounds like your getting old!


All we're saying is that is was probably down to another reason that you noticed the difference. Were they the same make of forks on the same make of bike set up in the same way? Or are you just being touchy? Razz

It's widely accepted that the average person would not notice the difference between USD and RWU forks on the road. Same with radial brakes. What's the main reason they get fitted? The same reason as carbon end cans (for example); it looks cool.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DynaMight
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:11 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've had 2 bikes with RWU (NC30 and ZX6R) and 2 bikes with USD (RS125 and GSXR750). The ones with RWU's handled better, although thats nothing to do with the actual forks themself but still shows that USD's dont really make a huge difference.
____________________
My bikes are at https://www.bikepics.com/members/dynamight/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:17 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Klause wrote:
Well I've had them both and I notice the difference.


The difference you mentioned is not a factor of upside down forks.

They do help with how a chassis feels more solid.

Klause wrote:
Why do so many people go "blah blah they don't make any difference" to all the new things that are starting to appear on bikes, sounds like your getting old!


We are getting old, but many things on their own make very little difference. Radial brakes as a basic idea seem to make virtually no difference that I can think of, beyond a fairly large increase in unsprung weight and the ease with which you can change the size of the front brake disks for a wet race while just changing a couple of small spacers for the calipers.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

jayluvmito
Crazy Courier



Joined: 15 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:16 - 03 Sep 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

DynaMight wrote:
I've been told before on a 125cc forum that USD forks make a sportsbike.... Rolling Eyes

now now dyna, he was a noob who got banned.

people still think it tho!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 20 years, 159 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 1.08 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 117.84 Kb