Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Down Gearing the VFR?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

retrofly
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:53 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Down Gearing the VFR? Reply with quote

hi
I wanna change it so it accelerates faster so a few questions

1.Go down one tooth on the front
2.Go down one tooth at the front and up one on the rear
3.How much top end is lost
4.Is it worth it?
5.How many teeth do both sprokets have as standard
6.Which/where should i get the new chain and sprokest from

Thanx for any replies

Luke
____________________
"The food was not undelicious"
-Homer Simpson (Exceptional beast : Underachiving Human)
www.geocities.com/retrofly
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Deano
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:12 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

retro, I've asked a few of the 400 racerboys about this and the seem to find dropping a tooth from the front and the back is what they use the most on tracks, but I've spoken to people who've -1 front and +3 rear and they say the difference is big on the acceleration but you loose about 10mph at top end but in london how often do you get to top end of 6th, erm..........never! Confused

Hope that helps Very Happy
____________________
Dean Stone #777
EMRA 2012 final standings, Formula 600s 3rd, Superstock 600s 3rd.
www.triplesevenracing.co.uk: www.ljmotorcyclerepairs.co.uk www.gettaylored.co.uk BN RaceScience, Now officially run out of money to carry on racing Sad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TiN
Pocket Tin



Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:25 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

The standard sprockets on the VFR is 15/40. Apparently, dropping one tooth from the front is the equivalent of adding 2 or 3 at the back. If you drop a tooth from the front, then you can probably get away with using your current chain, but if you get a bigger rear sprocket then you'll need a longer chain.

I was informed that a smaller front sprocket isn't too good for the life of your chain (again, it's just what someone has told me, I don't know from experience), so it's more advisable to get a bigger rear sprocket and a new chain.

As Dean said, acceleration will be improved but top-end will suffer (but 400s are built for top-end speed anyway, so f*ck it Very Happy), and your speedo will over-read by about 10%.
____________________
TiN
dotgems.net
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:17 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Smaller front sprockets wear out chains mroe quickly. The smaller they are the quicker they wear. If you go down one tooth then you can probably get away with using the same chain but not certain, but go down one at the front and up one at the rear then you should be fine. However if you stick an old chain on new sprockets then they will wear out more quickly

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

WildGoose
White Van Man



Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:18 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

are the speedo's measured from the sprocket on your 400's then?
____________________
So in other words, he stopped you for being flagrantly in posession of a motorcycle in direct contravention of the Hippies, Darkies and People Whose Face I Don't Like The Look of (Police Powers) Act. 1976
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Deano
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:22 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think they are! I was told if you change your gearing it affects the following, the speedo you will not be accurate you will be travelling slower than you clock indicates, you will constantly be hitting high revs without a thought which leads too more engine wear and more fuel consumption but not a massive difference though!
____________________
Dean Stone #777
EMRA 2012 final standings, Formula 600s 3rd, Superstock 600s 3rd.
www.triplesevenracing.co.uk: www.ljmotorcyclerepairs.co.uk www.gettaylored.co.uk BN RaceScience, Now officially run out of money to carry on racing Sad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

WildGoose
White Van Man



Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:27 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

err, your engine isnt gonna me damaged by high revs, as long as you dont exceed the red line

engines perform there best at high revs and are designed to be run as such, as long as the engine is warm, it wont do any damage

in fact it really annoys me people who dont rev there bloody bike, it seems like a waste, i was following a fazer in town and pulling away in first, he popped it into 2nd and subsequently 3rd and 4th before we even got to 25mph, and i was stilll in first, it was quite frustrating
____________________
So in other words, he stopped you for being flagrantly in posession of a motorcycle in direct contravention of the Hippies, Darkies and People Whose Face I Don't Like The Look of (Police Powers) Act. 1976
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Deano
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:33 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

@ Goose

were does the expression of "thrashing your bike" come from i've always thought that means that its causes more engine wear, I didnt say that it was going to damage your engine there is a difference in between the 2 you know..... Smile


P.S
I'm not trying to start an argument
____________________
Dean Stone #777
EMRA 2012 final standings, Formula 600s 3rd, Superstock 600s 3rd.
www.triplesevenracing.co.uk: www.ljmotorcyclerepairs.co.uk www.gettaylored.co.uk BN RaceScience, Now officially run out of money to carry on racing Sad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:51 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've always taken 'thrashing your bike' to mean riding hard etc (doesn't have to involve high revs, just pushing it etc) However some (noteably 2 strokes) bikes do work better if they are revved more, because they are designed to work best like that.

If you have a digital speedo then you can get 'yellow boxes' which convert the signal to whatever you want using a set of dip switches.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

craigT19
Jolly Green Giant



Joined: 09 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:19 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah when i say im going out for a thrash, i tend to mean hitting some twists going as fast as i can etc,

also G dont v4s ride like 2strokes in the way that at low revs they got no power they ned to be "wound up" to a sertain extent?
____________________
Bikes owned :- 2001 nsr125, 1999 zx6r, 2006 yzf-r1, 2009 xmax 250, 2012 yzf-r1, 2015 MT-07
Current bike : - 2016 MT-10
Crying or Very sad BCF member pops. sadly missed Crying or Very sad 1945-2003
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TiN
Pocket Tin



Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:26 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

craigT19 wrote:
also G dont v4s ride like 2strokes in the way that at low revs they got no power they ned to be "wound up" to a sertain extent?


Erm, no Question ...if anything, the ZXR4 needs to be thrashed like a mutha more than the 400 V4s...the design philosophy of the V4 was to take advantage of the v-twin midrange whilst maintaining the 4-cylinder peakiness.

If you mean "400s" rather than "V4s", then yeah, they definately need to be revved more than bigger engines.
____________________
TiN
dotgems.net
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

craigT19
Jolly Green Giant



Joined: 09 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:28 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok Wink

ive never been on a v-4 bigger than 400cc
____________________
Bikes owned :- 2001 nsr125, 1999 zx6r, 2006 yzf-r1, 2009 xmax 250, 2012 yzf-r1, 2015 MT-07
Current bike : - 2016 MT-10
Crying or Very sad BCF member pops. sadly missed Crying or Very sad 1945-2003
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:39 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

Errr... AFAIK low down power (/tourque) has more to do with size per cyclinder (and bore/stroke) than the actual configuartion of the engine.

My exapmple of 2 strokes is because, AFAIK again, 2 stroke exhausts are tuned for best performance at a certain rpm range, which will obviously be high rpm on a sports bike. Obviously there are similar things on 4 strokes (thus EXUP valves etc), but not to such a great extent.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TiN
Pocket Tin



Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:57 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Errr... AFAIK low down power (/tourque) has more to do with size per cyclinder (and bore/stroke) than the actual configuartion of the engine.


Yeah, but surely the configuration of the engine can determine the size of the cylinders? i.e. the design of the V-twin/4s can potentially allow each cylinder to be larger than, say, in an inline-4...?
____________________
TiN
dotgems.net
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Demonic69
The Pink Rhino



Joined: 31 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:31 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't really see any bike that runs well at low revs. All sports bikes, tourers and ST's will run better around/after 7krpm. That doesn't leave you much if you think thrashing your bike is gonna damage it.
____________________
Back on a Blade. Just feels so right.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

JimboJ
Manc Pikey



Joined: 23 Aug 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:35 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

im thinking of doind this(i know another idea Rolling Eyes) but i dont use top speed at all cos its unconfortable. i want as much accel as possible . the rear is -36 and thr fron is 14 i think. also thers a flat spot at 5000 revs which since ropey highlighted it to me its pissing me off.
____________________
[00:42] <NSR-Andy> which one's the missionary position
[00:42] <NSR-Andy> i've heard it's good
[9:42pm] <Shaun> you came first mike | <Shaun> yes gav, because I really want to fuck you
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:54 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

craig - ever head of a VFR750 or 800, or a pan european? both V4s over 400 cc.

and luke - i just went down one on the front, got a new chain too but its the same length, and going up more on the back shouldn't be a problem cos theres miles of adjustment there.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

WildGoose
White Van Man



Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:13 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

nah its cool dean im not starting an arguement either Smile

its just people always seem to be worried about damaging there engines, and they seem to forget that engines are dirty, noisy, in-efficient, and all they do from the time they are created is start to die, they are constantly wearing out, and i dont think the difference between high revs and low revs really makes a lot of difference to engine life

i could be way off here so Smile i'll allow keith or someone to state the facts
____________________
So in other words, he stopped you for being flagrantly in posession of a motorcycle in direct contravention of the Hippies, Darkies and People Whose Face I Don't Like The Look of (Police Powers) Act. 1976
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:35 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

TiN wrote:
G wrote:
Errr... AFAIK low down power (/tourque) has more to do with size per cyclinder (and bore/stroke) than the actual configuartion of the engine.


Yeah, but surely the configuration of the engine can determine the size of the cylinders? i.e. the design of the V-twin/4s can potentially allow each cylinder to be larger than, say, in an inline-4...?


Nope, not at all. Main thing that determines torque is engine capacity and the stroke. The longer the stroke the more torque you will have. Whether it is a V4, flat 4, square 4 or in line 4 makes no difference to the stroke. As such a V4 has no advantage over an inline 4 as far as absolute power and torque go. Has packaging advantages, plus running a V engine enables you to play with the engine to get it smoother without resorting to balance shafts

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

craigT19
Jolly Green Giant



Joined: 09 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:18 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

robby wrote:
craig - ever head of a VFR750 or 800, or a pan european? both V4s over 400 cc.


yes thank you robby im aware of that...if you read and fully understand my post you will se i said "i had never riden a v-4 bigger than 400cc" i said noughing about them not existing above 400cc Wink
____________________
Bikes owned :- 2001 nsr125, 1999 zx6r, 2006 yzf-r1, 2009 xmax 250, 2012 yzf-r1, 2015 MT-07
Current bike : - 2016 MT-10
Crying or Very sad BCF member pops. sadly missed Crying or Very sad 1945-2003
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:09 - 12 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

i thought you said you've never seen a v4 over 400cc, not ridden one...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Doddmaster
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:35 - 13 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

robby wrote:
craig - ever head of a VFR750 or 800, or a pan european? both V4s over 400 cc.

and luke - i just went down one on the front, got a new chain too but its the same length, and going up more on the back shouldn't be a problem cos theres miles of adjustment there.


You forgot the best V4 ever... V-Max Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

retrofly
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:55 - 13 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi
so how would i go about getting these chain and sprokets cause they aint standard? can i phone up places and get them to custom make me a set?

Luke
____________________
"The food was not undelicious"
-Homer Simpson (Exceptional beast : Underachiving Human)
www.geocities.com/retrofly
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Deano
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:24 - 13 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

@ Luke
B&C Express are the UK Renthals and Arrow Distrubutors, so ring them, Im soz I've lost the link, sprockets are dead cheap something like 15 - 20 notes each Smile and you have a choice of anodised ones aswell but the chain will set you around £50 Shocked .
I think stew knows the web links so ask him..... Very Happy
____________________
Dean Stone #777
EMRA 2012 final standings, Formula 600s 3rd, Superstock 600s 3rd.
www.triplesevenracing.co.uk: www.ljmotorcyclerepairs.co.uk www.gettaylored.co.uk BN RaceScience, Now officially run out of money to carry on racing Sad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Phoenix
Twisted Firestarter



Joined: 01 Aug 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:55 - 13 Mar 2003    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goose, engines do wear more quickly at higher revs. The bikes that tend to last the longest are low revving ones, a Diversion for example has an 8,5K redline I think. One of the major reasons car engines last so much longer than bikes is because they rev so low in comparison. Thrashing in my opinion and interpreted in the context it's usually used means sustaining high revs most of the time and constantly giving it handfuls of throttle. A bike that redlines at 14K will as a rule last longer if you usually rode it around at 7K, obviously taking it higher every now and then than if you constantly kept it at 10K rpm.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 23 years, 102 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 1.67 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 134.65 Kb