Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


How important is a fairing aerodynamically?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

c-m
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:36 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: How important is a fairing aerodynamically? Reply with quote

I have a ZXR750 - Now I prefer the look of the bike without the lower fairings, but I was just wondering how important they are in terms of aerodynamics?

I know the bely pan fairing on the GPZ500 was a very important aerodynamic piece, there are man stories of high speed weaves and wobbles without it.

Anyway the reason I ask is that I now have a full fairing set for my bike, all be it different colours and was wondering is its worth putting the lower panels on when travelling longer distances like 3000-5000miles.

I presume the weight will reduce fuel economy, but the fairing itself might reduce drag and hence make up for this.

Any thoughts?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:45 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bikes have the aerodynamics of houses. Just because they are not smooth all along. Even fairings can't make a bike anywhere near as aerodynamic as a car.

Even with fairings, they won't go that much faster.
More handling issues but even those, you will need to do high speeds.

Cue kickstart
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

McGee
O RLY?



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:46 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

allymoss wrote:
Bikes have the aerodynamics of houses.


Hayabusa.
____________________
◙◙► K6 GSXR 600 ◄◙◙◙◙► K5 GSXR 1000 ◄◙◙◙◙► K5 GSXR 600 ◄◙◙◙◙► 96 RF600r ◄◙◙
◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►
Its pronounced Jixxer!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

1016
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 24 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:53 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good one.... Hope you get a big response 'cos any useful information (on this subject) can only really come from first hand experience, and (as you know) results vary so much from bike to bike. Only generalising here, I would guess sub-50mph additional weight of full fairings would lower MPG but if you were cruising at 80 upwards, then surely you would see a MPG benefit. I think you are the very man for the job of doing back-to-back tests and posting results! Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:59 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

McGee wrote:
allymoss wrote:
Bikes have the aerodynamics of houses.


Hayabusa.


I suppose I should change that statement to

Bikes have the aerodynamics of houses compared to cars.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:52 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fuel consumption would increase, the amount of weight lost will be negliable compared to the loss of aero dynamics.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:11 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guy I know went out on a nitrous GSX1100 and went 164mph, put a fairing on it and went 191mph.

When you're looking for speed, aeros are everything!
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:28 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Bikes are lousy at aerodynamics. Fairing help, but even a 'busa is pretty dire. It is aerodynamic drag and most of it comes from the back and no bike has even a vaguely clean rear end. The effort goes into the fairings as people think the fairing is important when it is really the back end that is more important.

For comparision my unfaired 1200 Bandit has about 25% more power than my faired Bimota. Through timing lights the Bandit is only a couple of mph faster.

Stability is funny. Might make a massive difference (either way). For a (car) example, the old Ford Sierra had stability problems early on. The fix was a tiny bit of trim sticking out about 1cm at most around the rear side windows.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Tricolor
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 09 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:34 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's a significant difference between a faired and naked bike. However, there's very little difference between a faired and half-faired bike in terms of drag.

The lower half of bikes are aerodynamic disaster areas. Turbulent air coming off the front wheel is the biggest problem. Large cooling surfaces don't help either.
____________________
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

c_dug
Super Spammer



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:14 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Re: How important is a fairing aerodynamically? Reply with quote

c-m wrote:

I know the bely pan fairing on the GPZ500 was a very important aerodynamic piece, there are man stories of high speed weaves and wobbles without it.


I've heard this several times now about the GPZ, i smashed my belly pan to smithereens on a kerb at least 6 months ago now, i managed to bend the rear mounts as well so it hasn't been replaced. I have never had any stability issues at any speeds and i've done enough high speed motorway journeys to have noticed if there was some sort of wobble or weave.

c_dug
____________________
I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:18 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

This bike has a 50cc engine.
https://www.cybermotorcycle.com/gallery/kreidler/images/Kreidler_Van_Veen.jpg

Aerodynamics make a MASSIVE difference, even at low speeds. Otherwise they wouldn't bother bolting so much plastic to their ultra-lightweight racer.

The difference they make increases exponentially with speed. (friction is directly proportional to speed squared)

My H100 goes 5mph faster if I take one hand off the bars and put it behind my back. That's a 7% increase in top speed.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:20 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Re: How important is a fairing aerodynamically? Reply with quote

c_dug wrote:

I've heard this several times now about the GPZ, i smashed my belly pan to smithereens on a kerb at least 6 months ago now, i managed to bend the rear mounts as well so it hasn't been replaced. I have never had any stability issues at any speeds and i've done enough high speed motorway journeys to have noticed if there was some sort of wobble or weave.
c_dug


I've had two seperate ones (an A2 and a D) develop a disturbing slow weave that increased with speed from around 110mph upwards. It was totally abolished when I refitted the belly pan.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

c_dug
Super Spammer



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:31 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

meh, mines a D and ive never noticed it, i have it all the way up to 110mph and beyond on a pretty much daily basis so long as the weather and traffic allow.

Must just be an uber cool GPZ Thumbs Up

c_dug
____________________
I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Scotsman37
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:34 - 07 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aerodynamics - it keeps the brunt of the wind off you by reducing the drag when at speed and in return you improve the fuel efficiency of the bike. Also, it helps to deflect the rain when also at speed coming at you from the front and especially the when it's cold too.

Plus on the right bike with a smart looking design it just makes the bike look amazing !
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

1016
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 24 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:08 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:


Aerodynamics make a MASSIVE difference, even at low speeds.


but varies massively with size of bike and what you are calling 'low' speed - the racer you include will be spending most of its time flat out? (have no idea what that might be) and so fairing will largely be shaped with that in mind?. I will stick my neck out, as haven't researched enough, and say, majority of bikes 250 upwards would show no benefit mpg or aero at sub 40mph. I look forward to reading input from people who HAVE researched. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Smooth
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:09 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

From what I remember at uni, in general terms, in order to reduce the 'drag force' the frontal area should be reduced to a minimum, tapered and the rear end of a vehicle should either be vertical or very long and tapered. The typical coupé/hatchback is in-between these and is actually at a disadvantage compared with a like-for-like estate car.

If I remember correctly the Cd of a Transit is lower than that of a typical saloon car, but the frontal area is larger so the force resulting from drag is greater.
____________________
TDM850
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

c_dug
Super Spammer



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:23 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be almost impossible to make a vehicle in this shape but im 99% certain the most aerodynamic shape is the shape of a falling water droplet, i.e. large round frontal area and long drawn out rear working its way into a point, like so

c_dug
____________________
I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:34 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Drag makes a difference at low speed, but the difference increases massively with speed. At 40mph a typical unfaired bike will need about 17 lbs of thrust to overcome aerodynamic drag while a 'busa will about 15 lbs of thrust.

To put that in perspective a restricted 6 speed Cagiva Mito in top gear at 40mph has about 41 lbs of thrust (and if using the gears and down in 3rd it would have a 110 lbs of thrust).

While you can improve aerodynamics it tends to add weight, which destroys acceleration. However the weight has very little effect on top speed (a very very marginal effect on rolling resistance). Think this is the basis for the kamm tail designs of cars, as although a full tapering rear is better, once you have started to gently reduce the height at the back you have gained most of the advantages. After that you are adding weight and length for a diminishing return. This is why coupes are shaped like that.

As I understand it a large vertical rear end is pretty dire for aeodynamics. Just look at how a conventional car shape will generally keep the rear window clear of rain when moving, where an estate will need a rear wiper to clear off all the water droplets sucked round onto it.

Tear drop is pretty perfect, and to an extent used in faired bikes for top speed attempts. Trouble is stability. It will move the centre of pressure far forward , well in front of the driving wheel and centre of gravity. Makes it like trying to throw a dart backwards.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Smooth
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:40 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Think this is the basis for the kamm tail designs of cars, as although a full tapering rear is better...


Yes, a short slope with a sharp truncation is better than a 'half-way-house' sloping tail. An effective taper needs to be significantly long which would be impractical on a motorbike.


A water-drop style vehicle:
https://vkstudio.co.uk/graphics/belly3.jpg
The wheels spoil the shape somewhat though
____________________
TDM850
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:56 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

MC Bodge wrote:
Yes, a short slope with a sharp truncation is better than a 'half-way-house' sloping tail. An effective taper needs to be significantly long which would be impractical on a motorbike.


A direct chopped off rear (like a lorry or van) is pretty dire though. About a 50% taper seems to be accepted as a reasonable compromise between aerodynamics and weight / packaging, and likely than many coupes are close to this.

From an old article, a sphere has a Cd of about 0.45. A hollow sphre chopped in half with the hollow end facing the air flow has a Cd of about 1.4. A disk has a Cd of about 1.1. A teardrop shape has a Cd of about 0.05, while a reversed teardrop shape has a Cd of about 0.34. A wing section has a Cd of about 0.1~0.2.

Same article was playing around with a bit of bodywork coming up from behind the rider and over their back, fairing them in a bit (nothing done about the wheels, etc), using an early CBR600. Totally impractical for normal use. However that tail on the stock bike reduced the drag to 84% of the stock bike. With no bodywork at all the drag was 117% of the stock bike, and with no bodywork and the rider upright it was 134% of the stock bike.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Smooth
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:14 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
[A direct chopped off rear (like a lorry or van) is pretty dire though. About a 50% taper seems to be accepted as a reasonable compromise between aerodynamics and weight / packaging, and likely than many coupes are close to this.


Ive just found my uni lecturer's book on Google books, but the 2relevant pages are not shown!
"As the angle increases from zero (typical squareback) towards 15 degrees there is initially a slight drag reduction as the effective base area is reduced. ..." -I think he then went on to say that there is then an increase, until the angle is large. I remember a comment about many coupés being less 'aerodynamic' than the equivalent hatch/saloon/estate.

The chap in question did consultation for Indycar and Sports car racing teams.
____________________
TDM850
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:54 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most of the aerodynamic work on motorcycles is pissing into the wind until they make them with enclosed front wheels and stop putting riders on top of them.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:50 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

MC Bodge wrote:
"As the angle increases from zero (typical squareback) towards 15 degrees there is initially a slight drag reduction as the effective base area is reduced. ..." -I think he then went on to say that there is then an increase, until the angle is large. I remember a comment about many coupés being less 'aerodynamic' than the equivalent hatch/saloon/estate.


Might depend on what you think of as a typical coupe then. I would consider then to be far closer to the horizontal at the back than 45 degrees, until they get to the cut off point.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

1016
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 24 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:48 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I talked about research, I meant motorbikes... (as I think did OP) If we are including cars I had better reply when I have more time as although very rusty, a bit of a busman's holiday for me.
Meanwhile, does anyone have a (bike fairing related) practical answer for the layman yet?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Knacker
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:53 - 08 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im sure that once i read about this aerodynamics stuff and they compared a lambo to a VW camper and the camper came out on top ??? How the funk ?
____________________
Current: Gsxr 600 Srad - GS125 - DT125
Previous: K1 GSXR 1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 269 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.65 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 137.33 Kb