Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


having second thoughts

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

wupwup
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:02 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: having second thoughts Reply with quote

im 16 and have been set on getting a motorbike in a few months. but yesterday i managed to dislocate my shoulder again and im wondering whether its worth the risk. i mean i've only got one body and its already falling apart. do i want to risk a crash? people always go on about how bikes are deathtraps but are they really that dangerous or do they get that reputation because of pedbois riding into lampposts? is there a signifigant risk over cars? sorry for the weird question. thanks for any replies
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:13 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

You dislocated your shoulder again and you're wonder if it's worth the risk? I'd suggest that you stop doing whatever it is that has caused you to dislocate your shoulder again, then you should be able to ride a bike without problems. Wink

Cars are dangerous, how many people do you know who have been killed in car crashes?

Bikes are dangerous... crossing the road is dangerous, walking up or down stairs is dangerous, etc etc.

Do you ride a pushbike on the roads?

The risks from riding a bike are different to the risks of driving a car. In a car there isn't really any risk of falling off and being run over by a lorry. On a bike there isn't really any risk of crashing and then being trapped inside your burning vehicle.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

That_Hornet
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:45 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would rather be on my bike than in the back seat of a 3 door car any day. Thumbs Up

Bikes are dangerous, FACT. But that, I'm sure, is what motivates a lot of people to ride them. (Other than that its a fanny magnet)

But people can have a life time without crashing on a bike. Or if you Dunc about 3 weeks.

Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

cyberglass
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:44 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep bikes are a big risk but so is walking to the shops you could be Run down by a bus, Blown up by terrorists, Ripped apart by a illegal pitbull, Slip on a banana skin and break your neck and be paralyzed, of heaven forbid a plane engine could fall out the sky and squish you.
Rolling Eyes


Stop being a poofter and get a bike Thumbs Up
____________________
DL650 Vstrom 2004
DRZ400S 2003
Yamaha R1 2005
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:08 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you're a repeat dislocator you can get an op on the joint(s) that dislocate. I had a should done about 6 months ago. One night in hospital, no pain, 6 weeks in a sling and back to normal in 6 months.

Big purple scar too, hope it fade so I can get some ink over it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

wupwup
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:16 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

robby wrote:
If you're a repeat dislocator you can get an op on the joint(s) that dislocate. I had a should done about 6 months ago. One night in hospital, no pain, 6 weeks in a sling and back to normal in 6 months.

Big purple scar too, hope it fade so I can get some ink over it.


ha yeah, waiting to see what the quack says but it looks that way.
@ ste its different every time. i generaly dont do the same thing twice but tbh that policy is severly limiting the thingss i can do now. this time it was trying to take up boxing. blocked a left hook in a pad drill and pow. arm hanging of my hip (slight exageration Very Happy)

@ everyone thats a good way of looking at it. i could drop dead at any time so i guess how i get around is the least of my worries. though to be honest the idea of being a cripple is worse than the idea of straight out death
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:26 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read this then quit whining.
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

That_Hornet
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:06 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.whispermag.co.uk/siteimage/scale/800/600/28785.png
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:30 - 23 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate when I hear these ridiculous arguments along the lines of "...but you could die putting on your trousers in the morning". So what? You should take up russian roulette as a hobby?

The fact is that riding a motorbike is massively more dangerous than driving a car and saying anything different is counterproductive to the REAL argument for why it's still an acceptable risk which is to say that whilst you may be 10 times as likely to be seriously hurt on a bike than in a car (no idea what the actual stats are) you still aren't THAT likely to get hurt over a life times riding, just MORE likely than in a car.

I sometimes think about it because my other hobbies are rugby, snowboarding and scuba diving and if I was to ever damage myself seriously on the bike I may have to give them up (well the first two anyway). Frankly the rugby is more important to me than the bikes and the thought of not being able to play because I can't run properly (or at all) is pretty shit.
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:10 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I hate when I hear these ridiculous arguments along the lines of "...but you could die putting on your trousers in the morning". So what?

The 'so what' is to try and make people realise that there is risk attached to everything, nothing is completely safe. If you understand those risks and the dangers then you can make an informed decision, but if you choose to ignore the existence of those dangers then you're making a very uninformed decision which isn't a sensible thing for anyone to do.

You say motorcycles are massively more dangerous than driving a car? Maybe so, but in 2008 there were 572 pedestrian deaths compared to 493 motorcycle user fatalities on the roads in the United Kingdom. Shocked Shocked

So that's more dead pedestrians than dead motorcyclists and there are a lot more pedestrians in this country than there are motorcyclists. Razz

Road Casualties in Great Britain: Main Results: 2008

As for '10 times as likely to be seriously hurt on a bike than in a car', there are plenty of wild claims like that ranging from 10 times more likely, to 40 times more likely. The only thing that all those claims have in common, is that none of them have figures to back up them up.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:28 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ste wrote:

The 'so what' is to try and make people realise that there is risk attached to everything, nothing is completely safe. If you understand those risks and the dangers then you can make an informed decision, but if you choose to ignore the existence of those dangers then you're making a very uninformed decision which isn't a sensible thing for anyone to do.

But that is totally irrelevant. Just because there is risk associated with putting on trousers doesn't devalue the MUCH greater danger of other activities.

You say motorcycles are massively more dangerous than driving a car? Maybe so, but in 2008 there were 572 pedestrian deaths on the roads in the United Kingdom and there were 493 motorcycle user fatalities on the roads in the United Kingdom. Shocked Shocked

So that's more dead pedestrians than dead motorcyclists and there are a lot more pedestrians in this country than there are motorcyclists. Razz

I don't understand what you're saying here? You seem to be arguing against your own point? So yes, even though there must be at least 500 times as many pedestrians as motorcyclists, the numbers of each killed are not dissimilar ergo it is HUGELY more dangerous to ride a motorcycle.


As for '10 times as likely to be seriously hurt on a bike than in a car', there are plenty of wild claims like that ranging from 10 times more likely, to 40 times more likely. The only thing that all those claims have in common, is that none of them have figures to back up them up.

Obviously there are wide ranging statistics on this as in all other things but I doubt you;d find many that said it WASN'T significantly more dangerous to ride than drive and even forgetting the statistics it's just common sense! Obviously riding a motorbike is a RELATIVELY dangerous thing to do, it's beyond argument isn't it?

____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Redoko
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:28 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Life's for living.


Better to regret doing something than spend a lifetime wondering how it would be?


Try it... It's not like you can't sell the bike and buy a car, (when you're 17) although I can pretty much guarantee you, you will love it.

Thumbs Up
____________________
"Let's face it, this is not the worst thing you've caught me doing."
Sudika Sportsman SK50QT > Gilera DNA50 > Honda CBR125 RW7 > Kawasaki Zephyr750 > Suzuki GSXR600 > Honda Hornet CB600F '51
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:40 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

T0MMY wrote:

The fact is that riding a motorbike is massively more dangerous than driving a car and saying anything different is counterproductive to the REAL argument for why it's still an acceptable risk
Is that a line that mummy fed you this morning? Rolling Eyes

Pull the other one.

I've know more people crash and be injured in/through cars than bikes.

Truth is they're equally likely it's the person in contol that matters.
Well, no they're not equally likely given how many cars there are on the road and how many bikes there are but you get the idea. Karma
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:55 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

st3v3 wrote:

Is that a line that mummy fed you this morning? Rolling Eyes

Pull the other one.

I've know more people crash and be injured in/through cars than bikes.

Truth is they're equally likely it's the person in contol that matters.
Well, no they're not equally likely given how many cars there are on the road and how many bikes there are but you get the idea. Karma


Are you serious? Shocked You actually seriously believe it ISN'T more dangerous riding a motorbike than driving a car? No offence but that is fairly mental Laughing

The reason you know more people hurt in car crashes is obviously because you know more people who drive (as you state yourself).
Add up the number of riders and compare to the number of drivers of EVERYONE you know: family, friends, friends of friends, colleagues, neighbours, teachers from your school etc. etc. etc. I'd be surprised if the ratio wasn't at least 100 to 1. Now have you heard of 100 car crash injuries for each motorcycle injury you've heard about?
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:00 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

T0MMY wrote:

Are you serious? Shocked You actually seriously believe it ISN'T more dangerous riding a motorbike than driving a car? No offence but that is fairly mental Laughing
I do. If all cagers took a CBT it would be a helluva lot safer too.
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:10 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is truly fascinating...let me run through some parameters that seem true just through common sense and see which you do and don't believe:-

A crash at any given speed is more likely to result in serious injury on a bike than in a car? (we're talking statistically, obviously there is the rare occasion when a car catches fire or something)

A motorcycle is harder to see than a car in just about any situation?

The movement and road positioning of motorcycles is often unexpected for car drivers with filtering etc. and can put the riders in relatively dangerous positions?

Motorcycles generally have longer stopping distances than cars, especially whilst cornering?
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:31 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see what you did there, but your questions seem to be pretty biased towards your point, as a posed to neutral for 'research' as you suggested at the start of the post.

I'm sorry, I won't be made to feel like a guinea pig to prove your point.

I have no fur. Crying or Very sad
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:39 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

st3v3 wrote:
I see what you did there, but your questions seem to be pretty biased towards your point, as a posed to neutral for 'research' as you suggested at the start of the post.

I'm sorry, I won't be made to feel like a guinea pig to prove your point.

I have no fur. Crying or Very sad


What do you mean by biased? If you mean that all the facts are biased towards bikes being more dangerous then you are indeed correct. It would be hard to find many facts that would suggest differently because there can't be many Laughing Can you think of any? The ONLY real advantage I can see is that a bike is narrower so can avoid certain accidents like motorway pile ups perhaps and of course you can't be trapped in a burning motorbike Rolling Eyes This last one is a perennial favourite with people who don't wear seatbelts and pull out some apocraphyl tale of their mate of a mate who was told by his rescuers that he would have been killed if he WAS wearing one Rolling Eyes For each occasion in which that is true there are probably 50 dead motorists killed in minor shunts that would have only resulted in a bruised shoulder and some whiplash.

What I was hoping to gather was why you thought they weren't more dangerous, as in do you think you're less likely to be hurt or less likely to be involved in one in the first place? To me both seem patently untrue.
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

c_dug
Super Spammer



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:25 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a funny thread to read, TOMMY is 100% right in everything he has said I don't really see how it can be argued that bikes are safer Confused

However I would never let that stop me riding, despite the practicalities if it came down to it and I could only ever have one or the other it would be a bike every time.

By the way OP you're pretty unlikely to get an unbiased opinion about bike safety from a forum full of bikers

c_dug Laughing
____________________
I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Flip
Super Spammer



Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:42 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

st3v3 wrote:
If all cagers took a CBT it would be a helluva lot safer too.


I doubt it. People develop bad habits too easily. Most of them would forget the experience within 12 months.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:26 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think its all down to the luck of the draw when it comes to crashes...

It seems in crash X a seatbelt is a good thing, but in crash Y going out the window would have actually saved you....

Sure a car has crumple zones etc etc and is a metal cage. Bad news is that cage can crumple in on you and get you nicely pinned.

On the other hand bikers take to the road encased in a load of personal armour (well not all of them) that is excellent at abrasive protection. If you are lucky enough that the collision throws you clear of the vehicles and you go for a ride down the tarmac then you will most likely walk away from it, the same crash in a car could fuck you up. Or you are unlikely and have a toasty hot exhaust pipe wrapped round your leg...

Take mattspratts recent crash at about 70 I believe into the back of a slow moving (if not stationary) car. Rocketed forward, bounced of his head and walks away from it all with a broken hand.... If he was in a car it may have been much worse.

Truth is there is no "general accident", conditions and circumstances vary so much that I find it better to not give a shit and just ride.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

c_dug
Super Spammer



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:00 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bittern wrote:

Take mattspratts recent crash at about 70 I believe into the back of a slow moving (if not stationary) car. Rocketed forward, bounced of his head and walks away from it all with a broken hand.... If he was in a car it may have been much worse.
.


Or take Paulington's crash at around 30mph that left him properly messed up, in a car I think its safe to say he would have walked away.

In a slow speed (<40mph) accident involving another vehicle I think you would walk away 90% of the time relatively unharmed in a car, maybe whiplash or something but no broken bones, I honestly don't think you could say the same for a bike.

c_dug
____________________
I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:20 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="c_dug"]
Bittern wrote:

Take mattspratts recent crash at about 70 I believe into the back of a slow moving (if not stationary) car. Rocketed forward, bounced of his head and walks away from it all with a broken hand.... If he was in a car it may have been much worse.
.


Or take Paulington's crash at around 30mph that left him properly messed up, in a car I think its safe to say he would have walked away.

In a slow speed (<40mph) accident involving another vehicle I think you would walk away 90% of the time relatively unharmed in a car, maybe whiplash or something but no broken bones, I honestly don't think you could say the same for a bike.

c_dug[/quote

You are right a slow speed spill can absolutely destroy you!

Most of the people my old man knows who took major damage were all slow crashes... One poor chap was riding along on his moped and something went wrong and he went into a fence....

Ended up with a post going in at the shoulder and out the opposite side waiste. Apparently he was never the same after that.... Ouch!

I think you are probably right about slow speed stuff in a car, that nasty metal cage does a decent job from stopping the curbs etc break bones. As long as the impacts are sort of below the threshold of major structural deformation the car is on top, after that it seems to be luck of the draw....
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TheDonUK
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:57 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its risky, those of us who ride accept the risks, no one can tell you if you should accept the risks, its up to you to decide if riding bikes is worth it for you.

Whats the Anthony Hopkins quote in the worlds fastest indian?

"You live more in 5 minues going flat out on a fast bike than some people do in a lifetime"
____________________
[Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16]
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:04 - 24 Jan 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

T0MMY wrote:
The fact is that riding a motorbike is massively more dangerous than driving a car and saying anything different is counterproductive to the REAL argument for why it's still an acceptable risk which is to say that whilst you may be 10 times as likely to be seriously hurt on a bike than in a car (no idea what the actual stats are) you still aren't THAT likely to get hurt over a life times riding, just MORE likely than in a car.

Compare the figures of people that ride bikes like the average car driver, and car drivers that drive cars like the average bike rider and I suspect your hypothetical stats would be rather different.
Give your average person a rear wheel drive car that can do 0-60 in three second and I suspect we'd see rather a lot more carnage on the road despite 'safety features'.

Regardless, biking, like most activities is as DANGEROUS as you want it to be. If you don't care about the danger or even like it, you can ride in such a manner, if you want to seriously reduce the risk, to that way below many other daily activities, it's also fairly easy to achieve.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 253 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.16 Sec - Server Load: 1.26 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 140.42 Kb