Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


project KTMito

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:10 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: project KTMito Reply with quote

i might as well start the thread now then.

yes it a Mito KTM frankenbike.

so kind of sheer fortune meant that this project is a goer.

on ebay the other day i saw a KTM LC4 640 engine and though, yeah that looks good but the sprocket is on the wrong side to the Mito (which i already have) so i also found an aprilia RS125 front and rear end.

so me and chris-red went to pick it all up and had a go at bolting it together, bearing in mind i hadnt measured anything or investigated wheather or not this would work.

the RS125 swing arm fits in the Mito frame with around half inch of play. the swing arm wraps around the rear mount of the KTM engine like it was designed to fit it. Like a glove (in an ace ventura voice) and the engine also sits within the frame with small gap between what i think is possibly a water pump housing and the inside of the frame. the RS125 front end we put on just to see how it all looked.

so heres some pics adter about 2 hours work
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:20 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

the problems i will be facing are

-carb hits the top frame crossmember
-most likely a custom exhaust
-mounting the rear shock
-lots of wiring!!

main problem looks like the rear shock. the RS125 and Mito have a linkage type shock, so on the swing arm the mount isnt visable from the top so cant bolt a shock in from above and because its a frame and swing arm off different bikes, it might not be easy to recreate a linkage. i think the swing arm it too far forward to have enough space. maybe.

as for the carb, the top crossmember is welded. so i can get that redesigned and moved and at the same time possibly redesign the rear shock mounting. not sure if i can move the carb around and change the intake track as it will have to have bends in it which i dont want really.

from the pictures it looks like the frame is too high in the middle. not sure how much it can drop as the left hanger mount touches when its lowered. so either cut it off and mount the hanger elsewhere or leave it high. but that means higher centre of gravity.

as for looks, im thinking of a naked style, black and gold possibly. might even go for renthal bar but we'll see.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:53 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wrong Forum dickhead it should have been in show and tell.

More pictures.



https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0361.jpg

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0360.jpg

Exhaust Routing
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0358.jpg

Comparing the angle of the bikes angles to a standard mito.
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0357.jpg


https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0354.jpg

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0355.jpg

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0348.jpg

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0345.jpg

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0342.jpg

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/chris-red/IMG_0340.jpg
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:56 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don;t thing the exhaust or wiring will be a problem you have the full KTM loom, and the exhaust isn't far of fitting stock.

The rear shock will be the biggest problem followed by mounting the carb.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:21 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

your the problem Chris Middle Finger
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

hmmmnz
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:22 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

thats pretty damn good,
i wouldnt even call those problems,
just tiny little hick ups,

karma for both you 2 bitches Thumbs Up
____________________
the humans are dead
I kick arse for the lord
Wiring Diagrams BIDNIP it bitches
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:13 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe moving the engine forwards will get you some carb space?

https://cdn.bikechatforums.com/files/img_0447__small_.jpg

Even Seth Rogen is impressed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mad4it028
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:25 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

can you not slant the engine forward enough to make room for the carb?
which will also lower the center of gravety or does the engine have to sit bolt upright?
____________________
always looking to buy bikes crashed ,unfinished projects,none runners pm me
currently riding kawasaki z1000 only bike ive ever loved
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:20 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

mad4it028 wrote:
can you not slant the engine forward enough to make room for the carb?
which will also lower the center of gravety or does the engine have to sit bolt upright?


The carb is pointing slightly upwards. Dropping the front of the engine still causes it to hit the frame.

Can't move it forward as it uses the rear mount which bolts through the frame, swing arm pivot and engine.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:23 - 14 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also I need to try to keep the engine level. For the oil level and for the carb. If it's not at the right angle I'm not sure how it will affect fueling.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:48 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because of the swing arm/frame combination I'm considering a custom swing arm. I've seen a few tubular types online which look good.

Does anyone know of any good engineering or bike shops in Essex that are worth contacting?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Tim..
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:52 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is putting the Aprilia wheel etc into the Mito swingarm not an option?
____________________
Project builds: My VFR400 nc30 build thread + Honda Britain Rep VFR + What? Another VFR +Project 'cos I want one' + V8 coffee table
www.marshallracing.co.uk
OCD - Helping to bring the standard of my bikes up and make me slowly go mad since 1999
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

KDub
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:20 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why would you want to lower the centre of gravity? It's better to leave it high.

Get ready for some propper engineering maths, taken from the book on Motorcycle Design and Technology:

(I'm going to use emoticons instead of real symbols though)

"There is only one precise angle of inclination that allows you to maintain your balance at any particular speed when cornering."

tan Very Happy = v^2 / (R^2 x g)

Where Very Happy is the lean angle, v is the velocity, R is the radius of the corner, and g is gravity (taken to be 9.81m/s^2, just use 9.81).

Of course in that equation there's no mention of the height of the centre of gravity, but you'll need the resullt of that equation for this one:

sin(ArrowVery Happy) = (t x sin Very Happy) / h - t

Where Arrow is a substitute for the symbol delta which means "the change in", t is the radius of the tyre (so a 160 size tyre has a radius of 80mm or 0.08m, there are further refinements to this, but I haven't learnt them yet), h is the height of the centre of gravity, and Very Happy is the result of the first equation.

Once you've got both answers just add them together and you'll find out the lean angle required for any given corner radius at any given speed.

You'll need to use SI units throughout, as in metres and metres per second.

So anyway the point of all this is that a bigger value for the height of the centre of gravity results in a smaller change in lean angle, which means you can go faster around corners.

It also proves that skinny tyres are the way forwards, anyone "upgrading" to a 180 section tyre from anything smaller is just kidding themselves. Especially on small bikes. The only time you need a wider tyre is when you're prepared to sacrifice mid corner speed for traction on acceleration.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:35 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Timon wrote:
Is putting the Aprilia wheel etc into the Mito swingarm not an option?


Because the mito has a banana shape arm the chain run on the left is flat. The right isn't and on the ktm the sprocket is on the right. So that was the idea of using the rs125. But they use a linkage type rear shock. The linkage mounts between the underneath of the arm and low down on the frame. The mito frame has a high up mount. I may be able to fabricate a linkage to cope with the big difference but then I don't think I could get the shock between the linkage and the top frame mount as it's not a clear run. (because they're from different bikes). The only options I cam see at the minute is custom swing arm or custom linkage, and whilst moving the top frame brace to suit the carb I also make it suitable for the shock. This option is good but how good would a tubular swing arm look?? Fucking good. That's how much Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:41 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

KDub,,,

That's excellent. I'm not going to try and move the centre of gravity at all. The engine is going where it fits and where it's straight and square. One question I had was about tires actually. I was wondering what it is that goes into the choice? I think the mito has a 110/60 or 120/60 or something.

So in short and without too much maths with faces instead of symbols, what's your advice on the setup? And when u say inclination, are you talking about the angle of the bike and it's other angles etc. If you look at my picture it looks like the swing arm pivot is too high but because of the shape of the frame if the 'suspension' (bit of wood) compressed the high point touches the frame. So I need to drop the front down of not have much suspension travel or have a high bike???
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

KDub
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:18 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

steven_191 wrote:
KDub,,,

That's excellent. I'm not going to try and move the centre of gravity at all. The engine is going where it fits and where it's straight and square. One question I had was about tires actually. I was wondering what it is that goes into the choice? I think the mito has a 110/60 or 120/60 or something.

So in short and without too much maths with faces instead of symbols, what's your advice on the setup? And when u say inclination, are you talking about the angle of the bike and it's other angles etc. If you look at my picture it looks like the swing arm pivot is too high but because of the shape of the frame if the 'suspension' (bit of wood) compressed the high point touches the frame. So I need to drop the front down of not have much suspension travel or have a high bike???


There's a lot that goes into tyre choice, but ultimately it's a compromise between grip, lean angle, and cost. I would try and stick with what you have at the moment, if grip becomes an issue later on then it might be worth thinking about wider tyres or even better would be stickier rubber. Just out of interest, do you know how much power that engine's putting out?

Angle of inclination refers to the lean angle you're getting when cornering.

Frame geometry is complicated. I'd argue that the most important value to get right is the trail because it effects how quickly the bike falls into corners, round about 95mm is a good base to work off. If the forks you're using are roughly the same length as the stock forks, and the yokes have roughly the same offset then it shouldn't be too much of an issue. Just be really careful on the first ride, a lot of getting this right consists mainly of trial and error.

As for your swing arm, you want it sitting at somewhere between 10 and 12 degrees with nobody sitting on it. Most sport bikes seem to be around this mark. If it looks about right, then it probably is. When you say the swingarm touches the frame; where exactly and how much has the "suspension" compressed? You'll need to measure that between the mounting points, i.e. an uncompressed value, and a fully compressed value, and then work out the difference between the two; it the difference is more than your suspension can compress by then there's no problem.

Pictures of the suspension linkages would be a big help.

Don't let this put you off though, it's looking like a good project so far Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:21 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was going to tell you I planned to put my maths a-level to use and work out the geometry of the standard Mito then we could try to keep the same/similar geometries.


Also surely lower CoG is better on a bike?

Someone should move this to S&T too.

JMC and Metchamex do swingarms, it won't be cheap mind.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:25 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

KDub wrote:
steven_191 wrote:
KDub,,,

That's excellent. I'm not going to try and move the centre of gravity at all. The engine is going where it fits and where it's straight and square. One question I had was about tires actually. I was wondering what it is that goes into the choice? I think the mito has a 110/60 or 120/60 or something.

So in short and without too much maths with faces instead of symbols, what's your advice on the setup? And when u say inclination, are you talking about the angle of the bike and it's other angles etc. If you look at my picture it looks like the swing arm pivot is too high but because of the shape of the frame if the 'suspension' (bit of wood) compressed the high point touches the frame. So I need to drop the front down of not have much suspension travel or have a high bike???


There's a lot that goes into tyre choice, but ultimately it's a compromise between grip, lean angle, and cost. I would try and stick with what you have at the moment, if grip becomes an issue later on then it might be worth thinking about wider tyres or even better would be stickier rubber. Just out of interest, do you know how much power that engine's putting out?

Angle of inclination refers to the lean angle you're getting when cornering.

Frame geometry is complicated. I'd argue that the most important value to get right is the trail because it effects how quickly the bike falls into corners, round about 95mm is a good base to work off. If the forks you're using are roughly the same length as the stock forks, and the yokes have roughly the same offset then it shouldn't be too much of an issue. Just be really careful on the first ride, a lot of getting this right consists mainly of trial and error.

As for your swing arm, you want it sitting at somewhere between 10 and 12 degrees with nobody sitting on it. Most sport bikes seem to be around this mark. If it looks about right, then it probably is. When you say the swingarm touches the frame; where exactly and how much has the "suspension" compressed? You'll need to measure that between the mounting points, i.e. an uncompressed value, and a fully compressed value, and then work out the difference between the two; it the difference is more than your suspension can compress by then there's no problem.

Pictures of the suspension linkages would be a big help.

Don't let this put you off though, it's looking like a good project so far Thumbs Up


The engine is 55bhp (claimed), also I believe the RS125 wheel that is on it atm has a 130 wide tyre.

My idea was to keep the geometry of the new build as similar as possible to a standard Mito. The swingarm is about 50mm shorter though so the wheel base will be shorter.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:27 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

steven_191 wrote:
your the problem Chris Middle Finger


Funny how this was posted a mere 16 hours after begging me to help you at the lock up. Wink
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

KDub
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:48 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
The engine is 55bhp (claimed), also I believe the RS125 wheel that is on it atm has a 130 wide tyre.

My idea was to keep the geometry of the new build as similar as possible to a standard Mito. The swingarm is about 50mm shorter though so the wheel base will be shorter.


That tyre size shouldn't pose a problem, and sticking as close to stock geometry as possible will save an awful lot of messing around.

The swingarm being that much shorter is interesting though, on the one hand it should corner better, on the other you may lose a bit of traction on acceleration.

Another thing worth considering is where the CofG sits horizontally because having it towards the front will cause oversteer (and make stoppies easier) and having it towards the rear will cause understeer (and make wheelies easier). You can change it by mounting your engine accordingly. It's not an end of the world situation, more something to bear in mind on the test ride.


Last edited by KDub on 18:30 - 16 Feb 2011; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:11 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
steven_191 wrote:
your the problem Chris Middle Finger


Funny how this was posted a mere 16 hours after begging me to help you at the lock up. Wink


you were only there to hold things. stop sounding like your doing any work here. fucking labourer!!


i cant remember which swing arm was shorter. ill take some more pictures and measurements next time im there. should be sunday.

as for suspension travel, i dont think theres much.

the engine is in pretty much the same place as the standard mito engine. its slightly higher though i think and a bit heavier.

sticking to the original geometry is a good idea but i dont think its possible with this swingarm hitting the frame issue. to solve it i need to either cut off the hanger mount or cut something out of the swingarm.

need to get more pictures!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:19 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

The RS swingarm was definately shorter, I'm pretty sure it was by 50 something mm. I vote we just cut bits off till it fits. Laughing Have you got your helicoil kit yet?
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

steven_191
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:22 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
The RS swingarm was definately shorter, I'm pretty sure it was by 50 something mm. I vote we just cut bits off till it fits. Laughing Have you got your helicoil kit yet?


yes its amazing, i helicoiled one of the bolt holes in the mito casing today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:25 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

steven_191 wrote:
chris-red wrote:
The RS swingarm was definately shorter, I'm pretty sure it was by 50 something mm. I vote we just cut bits off till it fits. Laughing Have you got your helicoil kit yet?


yes its amazing, i helicoiled one of the bolt holes in the mito casing today.


Come round and do the Triumph
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MaybeGuy
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:28 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

i predict a fail unless you modify the frame crossbar around the carb.
____________________
Blue_SV650S wrote: it was a sh1te wheelie, but it proves that he can get it up in 3rd and can do angles. In summery, mattsprattuk is a gobby little sh1tebag, dopehead tw4t, but sadly for all of us, he probably isn't THAT full of sh1te!! Mr. Green
Kickstart wrote: Hi I tend to agree with Matt. All the best Keith
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 312 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.7 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 143.38 Kb